4,666 research outputs found
Extending ACL2 with SMT Solvers
We present our extension of ACL2 with Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT)
solvers using ACL2's trusted clause processor mechanism. We are particularly
interested in the verification of physical systems including Analog and
Mixed-Signal (AMS) designs. ACL2 offers strong induction abilities for
reasoning about sequences and SMT complements deduction methods like ACL2 with
fast nonlinear arithmetic solving procedures. While SAT solvers have been
integrated into ACL2 in previous work, SMT methods raise new issues because of
their support for a broader range of domains including real numbers and
uninterpreted functions. This paper presents Smtlink, our clause processor for
integrating SMT solvers into ACL2. We describe key design and implementation
issues and describe our experience with its use.Comment: In Proceedings ACL2 2015, arXiv:1509.0552
Strict General Setting for Building Decision Procedures into Theorem Provers
The efficient and flexible incorporating of decision procedures into theorem provers is very important for their successful use. There are several approaches for combining and augmenting of decision procedures; some of them support handling uninterpreted functions, congruence closure, lemma invoking etc. In this paper we present a variant of one general setting for building decision procedures into theorem provers (gs framework [18]). That setting is based on macro inference rules motivated by techniques used in different approaches. The general setting enables a simple describing of different combination/augmentation schemes. In this paper, we further develop and extend this setting by an imposed ordering on the macro inference rules. That ordering leads to a ”strict setting”. It makes implementing and using variants of well-known or new schemes within this framework a very easy task even for a non-expert user. Also, this setting enables easy comparison of different combination/augmentation schemes and combination of their ideas
Hierarchic Superposition Revisited
Many applications of automated deduction require reasoning in first-order
logic modulo background theories, in particular some form of integer
arithmetic. A major unsolved research challenge is to design theorem provers
that are "reasonably complete" even in the presence of free function symbols
ranging into a background theory sort. The hierarchic superposition calculus of
Bachmair, Ganzinger, and Waldmann already supports such symbols, but, as we
demonstrate, not optimally. This paper aims to rectify the situation by
introducing a novel form of clause abstraction, a core component in the
hierarchic superposition calculus for transforming clauses into a form needed
for internal operation. We argue for the benefits of the resulting calculus and
provide two new completeness results: one for the fragment where all
background-sorted terms are ground and another one for a special case of linear
(integer or rational) arithmetic as a background theory
HoCHC: A Refutationally Complete and Semantically Invariant System of Higher-order Logic Modulo Theories
We present a simple resolution proof system for higher-order constrained Horn
clauses (HoCHC) - a system of higher-order logic modulo theories - and prove
its soundness and refutational completeness w.r.t. the standard semantics. As
corollaries, we obtain the compactness theorem and semi-decidability of HoCHC
for semi-decidable background theories, and we prove that HoCHC satisfies a
canonical model property. Moreover a variant of the well-known translation from
higher-order to 1st-order logic is shown to be sound and complete for HoCHC in
standard semantics. We illustrate how to transfer decidability results for
(fragments of) 1st-order logic modulo theories to our higher-order setting,
using as example the Bernays-Schonfinkel-Ramsey fragment of HoCHC modulo a
restricted form of Linear Integer Arithmetic
- …