80 research outputs found
Derandomized Parallel Repetition via Structured PCPs
A PCP is a proof system for NP in which the proof can be checked by a
probabilistic verifier. The verifier is only allowed to read a very small
portion of the proof, and in return is allowed to err with some bounded
probability. The probability that the verifier accepts a false proof is called
the soundness error, and is an important parameter of a PCP system that one
seeks to minimize. Constructing PCPs with sub-constant soundness error and, at
the same time, a minimal number of queries into the proof (namely two) is
especially important due to applications for inapproximability.
In this work we construct such PCP verifiers, i.e., PCPs that make only two
queries and have sub-constant soundness error. Our construction can be viewed
as a combinatorial alternative to the "manifold vs. point" construction, which
is the only construction in the literature for this parameter range. The
"manifold vs. point" PCP is based on a low degree test, while our construction
is based on a direct product test. We also extend our construction to yield a
decodable PCP (dPCP) with the same parameters. By plugging in this dPCP into
the scheme of Dinur and Harsha (FOCS 2009) one gets an alternative construction
of the result of Moshkovitz and Raz (FOCS 2008), namely: a construction of
two-query PCPs with small soundness error and small alphabet size.
Our construction of a PCP is based on extending the derandomized direct
product test of Impagliazzo, Kabanets and Wigderson (STOC 09) to a derandomized
parallel repetition theorem. More accurately, our PCP construction is obtained
in two steps. We first prove a derandomized parallel repetition theorem for
specially structured PCPs. Then, we show that any PCP can be transformed into
one that has the required structure, by embedding it on a de-Bruijn graph
Special Section on the Forty-First Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2009)
This issue of SICOMP contains nine specially selected papers from the Forty-first Annual ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, otherwise known as STOC 2009, held May 31 to June 2 in Bethesda, Maryland. The papers here were chosen to represent both the excellence and the broad range of the STOC program. The papers have been revised and extended by the authors, and subjected to the standard thorough reviewing process of SICOMP.
The program committee consisted of Susanne Albers, Andris Ambainis, Nikhil Bansal, Paul Beame, Andrej Bogdanov, Ran Canetti, David Eppstein, Dmitry Gavinsky, Shafi Goldwasser, Nicole Immorlica, Anna Karlin, Jonathan Katz, Jonathan Kelner, Subhash Khot, Ravi Kumar, Leslie Ann Goldberg, Michael Mitzenmacher (Chair), Kamesh Munagala, Rasmus Pagh, Anup Rao, Rocco Servedio, Mikkel Thorup, Chris Umans, and Lisa Zhang. They accepted 77 papers out of 321 submissions
Lower bounds for constant query affine-invariant LCCs and LTCs
Affine-invariant codes are codes whose coordinates form a vector space over a
finite field and which are invariant under affine transformations of the
coordinate space. They form a natural, well-studied class of codes; they
include popular codes such as Reed-Muller and Reed-Solomon. A particularly
appealing feature of affine-invariant codes is that they seem well-suited to
admit local correctors and testers.
In this work, we give lower bounds on the length of locally correctable and
locally testable affine-invariant codes with constant query complexity. We show
that if a code is an -query
locally correctable code (LCC), where is a finite field and
is a finite alphabet, then the number of codewords in is
at most . Also, we show that if
is an -query locally testable
code (LTC), then the number of codewords in is at most
. The dependence on in these
bounds is tight for constant-query LCCs/LTCs, since Guo, Kopparty and Sudan
(ITCS `13) construct affine-invariant codes via lifting that have the same
asymptotic tradeoffs. Note that our result holds for non-linear codes, whereas
previously, Ben-Sasson and Sudan (RANDOM `11) assumed linearity to derive
similar results.
Our analysis uses higher-order Fourier analysis. In particular, we show that
the codewords corresponding to an affine-invariant LCC/LTC must be far from
each other with respect to Gowers norm of an appropriate order. This then
allows us to bound the number of codewords, using known decomposition theorems
which approximate any bounded function in terms of a finite number of
low-degree non-classical polynomials, upto a small error in the Gowers norm
A No-Go Theorem for Derandomized Parallel Repetition: Beyond Feige-Kilian
In this work we show a barrier towards proving a randomness-efficient
parallel repetition, a promising avenue for achieving many tight
inapproximability results. Feige and Kilian (STOC'95) proved an impossibility
result for randomness-efficient parallel repetition for two prover games with
small degree, i.e., when each prover has only few possibilities for the
question of the other prover. In recent years, there have been indications that
randomness-efficient parallel repetition (also called derandomized parallel
repetition) might be possible for games with large degree, circumventing the
impossibility result of Feige and Kilian. In particular, Dinur and Meir
(CCC'11) construct games with large degree whose repetition can be derandomized
using a theorem of Impagliazzo, Kabanets and Wigderson (SICOMP'12). However,
obtaining derandomized parallel repetition theorems that would yield optimal
inapproximability results has remained elusive.
This paper presents an explanation for the current impasse in progress, by
proving a limitation on derandomized parallel repetition. We formalize two
properties which we call "fortification-friendliness" and "yields robust
embeddings." We show that any proof of derandomized parallel repetition
achieving almost-linear blow-up cannot both (a) be fortification-friendly and
(b) yield robust embeddings. Unlike Feige and Kilian, we do not require the
small degree assumption.
Given that virtually all existing proofs of parallel repetition, including
the derandomized parallel repetition result of Dinur and Meir, share these two
properties, our no-go theorem highlights a major barrier to achieving
almost-linear derandomized parallel repetition
Toward probabilistic checking against non-signaling strategies with constant locality
Non-signaling strategies are a generalization of quantum strategies that have been studied in physics over the past three decades. Recently, they have found applications in theoretical computer science, including to proving inapproximability results for linear programming and to constructing protocols for delegating computation. A central tool for these applications is probabilistically checkable proof (PCPs) systems that are sound against non-signaling strategies. In this thesis we show, assuming a certain geometrical hypothesis about noise robustness of non-signaling proofs (or, equivalently, about robustness to noise of solutions to the Sherali-Adams linear program), that a slight variant of the parallel repetition of the exponential-length constant-query PCP construction due to Arora et al. (JACM 1998) is sound against non-signaling strategies with constant locality. Our proof relies on the analysis of the linearity test and agreement test (also known as the direct product test) in the non-signaling setting
Property Testing via Set-Theoretic Operations
Given two testable properties and , under
what conditions are the union, intersection or set-difference of these two
properties also testable? We initiate a systematic study of these basic
set-theoretic operations in the context of property testing. As an application,
we give a conceptually different proof that linearity is testable, albeit with
much worse query complexity. Furthermore, for the problem of testing
disjunction of linear functions, which was previously known to be one-sided
testable with a super-polynomial query complexity, we give an improved analysis
and show it has query complexity O(1/\eps^2), where \eps is the distance
parameter.Comment: Appears in ICS 201
05291 Abstracts Collection -- Sublinear Algorithms
From 17.07.05 to 22.07.05, the Dagstuhl Seminar
05291 ``Sublinear Algorithms\u27\u27 was held
in the International Conference and Research Center (IBFI),
Schloss Dagstuhl.
During the seminar, several participants presented their current
research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of
the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of
seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section
describes the seminar topics and goals in general.
Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available
- …