Neural mechanisms underlying probalistic category learning in normal aging.

Probabilistic category learning engages neural circuitry that includes the prefrontal cortex and caudate nucleus, two regions that show prominent changes with normal aging. However, the specific contributions of these brain regions are uncertain, and the effects of normal aging have not been examined previously in probabilistic category learning. In the present study, using a blood oxygenation level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging block design, 18 healthy young adults (mean age, 25.5 ± 2.6 years) and 15 older adults (mean age, 67.1 ± 5.3 years) were assessed on the probabilistic category learning "weather prediction" test. Whole-brain functional images acquired using a 1.5T scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI) with gradient echo, echo planar imaging (3/1 mm; repetition time, 3000 ms; echo time, 50 ms) were analyzed using second-level random-effects procedures [SPM99 (Statistical Parametric Mapping)]. Young and older adults displayed equivalent probabilistic category learning curves, used similar strategies, and activated analogous neural networks, including the prefrontal and parietal cortices and the caudate nucleus. However, the extent of caudate and prefrontal activation was less and parietal activation was greater in older participants. The percentage correct and reaction time were mainly positively correlated with caudate and prefrontal activation in young individuals but positively correlated with prefrontal and parietal cortices in older individuals. Differential activation within a circumscribed neural network in the context of equivalent learning suggests that some brain regions, such as the parietal cortices, may provide a compensatory mechanism for healthy older adults in the context of deficient prefrontal cortex and caudate nuclei responses. Copyright © 2005 Society for Neuroscience

Memory in Autistic Spectrum Disorder

Behavioral evidence concerning memory in high-functioning forms of autism (HFA) and in moderately low-functioning autism (M-LFA) is reviewed and compared. Findings on M-LFA are sparse. However, it is provisionally concluded that memory profiles in HFA and M-LFA (relative to ability-matched controls) are similar, but that declarative memory impairments are more extensive in M-LFA than in HFA. Specifically, both groups have diminished memory for emotion- or person-related stimuli. Regarding memory for non-social stimuli, both groups probably have mental-age appropriate nondeclarative memory; and within declarative memory, both groups have mental-age appropriate immediate free recall of within-span or supra-span lists of unrelated items, as well as cued recall and paired associate learning. By contrast, recognition is largely unimpaired in HFA but moderately impaired in M-LFA; and free recall of meaningful or structured stimuli is moderately impaired in HFA but more severely impaired in M-LFA. Theoretical explanations of data on declarative memory in HFA identify problems in the integrative processing, or the consolidation and storage, of complex stimuli; or a specific problem of recollection. Proposed neural substrates include the following: disconnectivity of primary sensory and association areas; dysfunctions of medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus or posterior parietal lobe; or combinations of these associated with neural disconnectivity. Hypothetically, perirhinal dysfunction might explain the more extensive declarative memory impairments in M-LFA. Foreseeable consequences of uneven memory abilities in HFA and M-LFA are outlined, including possible effects on language and learning in M-LFA. Finally, priorities for future research are identified, highlighting the urgent need for research on memory in lower-functioning individuals

Learning to remember: The early ontogeny of episodic memory

AbstractOver the past 60 years the neural correlates of human episodic memory have been the focus of intense neuroscientific scrutiny. By contrast, neuroscience has paid substantially less attention to understanding the emergence of this neurocognitive system. In this review we consider how the study of memory development has evolved. In doing so, we concentrate primarily on the first postnatal year because it is within this time window that the most dramatic shifts in scientific opinion have occurred. Moreover, this time frame includes the critical age (∼9 months) at which human infants purportedly first begin to demonstrate rudimentary hippocampal-dependent memory. We review the evidence for and against this assertion, note the lack of direct neurocognitive data speaking to this issue, and question how demonstrations of exuberant relational learning and memory in infants as young as 3-months old can be accommodated within extant models. Finally, we discuss whether current impasses in the infant memory literature could be leveraged by making greater use of neuroimaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which have been deployed so successfully in adults

Individual differences in face cognition

Zusammenhänge zwischen neurokognitiven Indikatoren und Verhaltensindikatoren der Gesichterkognition können Gehirnsysteme und neuronale Subprozesse identifizieren, die individuellen Unterschieden im Verhalten zugrunde liegen. Diese Dissertation zeigt, dass Ereigniskorrelierte Potentiale (EKPs) als neurokognitive Indikatoren für die Erforschung individueller Unterschiede eingesetzt werden können, denn sie weisen die gleichen hohen psychometrischen Qualitäten wie andere Fähigkeitsindikatoren auf und messen daher individuelle Unterschiede in der neuronalen Verarbeitung zuverlässig und stabil über die Zeit. Auf der Verhaltensebene wurden drei Teilfähigkeiten der Gesichterkognition etabliert: Gesichterwahrnehmung, Gesichtergedächtnis und Gesichtergeschwindigkeit. EKPs wurden in Strukturgleichungsmodellen verwendet, um den Beitrag neurokognitiver Indikatoren an individuellen Unterschieden dieser Gesichterkognitionsfähigkeiten zu schätzen. Für 85 Probanden wurden Beziehungen zwischen den Gesichterkognitionsfähigkeiten und der P100, N170, der sogenannten Differenz aufgrund des Gedächtnisses (Dm) und dem frühen sowie späten Wiederholungseffekt (ERE und LRE) etabliert. Spezifische Anteile individueller Unterschiede in der Gesichterkognition auf der Verhaltensebene wurden durch individuelle Unterschiede im Zeitverlauf der strukturellen Gesichteranalyse (N170 Latenz) sowie in der Reaktivierung von Repräsentationen gespeicherter Gesichtsstrukturen (ERE) als auch personen-spezifischen Wissens (LRE) erklärt. Keinen Anteil an individuellen Unterschieden erklärten hingegen frühe Wahrnehmungsprozesse (P100), die neuronale Aktivierung während der strukturellen Gesichteranalyse (N170 Amplitude) und Prozesse der Gedächtnisenkodierung von Gesichtern (Dm). Diese Ergebnisse zeigen, dass individuelle Unterschiede in der Gesichterkognition von der strukturellen Gesichteranalyse sowie von der Effizienz und Geschwindigkeit des Zugriffs auf Gedächtnisinhalte zu Gesichtern und Personen abhängt.Individual differences in perceiving, learning, and recognizing faces were shown on the behavioral and neural level but were rarely related to one another. By determining relationships between behavioral and neurocognitive indicators of face cognition, brain systems and neural sub-processes can be identified that underlie individual variations on the behavioral level. The present dissertation laid the foundation for using event-related potentials (ERPs) as neurocognitive indicators in individual differences research. ERP components were shown to possess the same high psychometric qualities as behavioral ability measures and thus to measure individual differences of neural processing reliably and stably across time. On the behavioral level, three component abilities of face cognition were established: face perception, face memory, and the speed of face cognition. ERP components were used in structural equation models that estimated contributions of neurocognitive indicators to the individual differences in these face cognition abilities. Regression analysis was used to determine the contributions of P100, N170, the so called difference due to memory (Dm), as well as early and late repetition effects (ERE and LRE) to face cognition abilities in 85 participants. Certain amounts of variance in face cognition as seen on the behavioral level were accounted for by individual differences in the temporal dimension of structural encoding of a face (N170 latency) and in the re-activation of both stored facial structures (ERE) and person-identity information (LRE). In contrast, processes of early vision (P100), the neural activation of structural face encoding (N170 amplitude), and memory encoding of new faces (Dm) did not show any contribution to individual differences in face cognition. These findings show that individual differences in face cognition depend on the speed of structurally encoding faces and on the efficiency and speed of accessing face and person memory

Social Psychology and Neuroscience: Strange Bedfellows or a Healthy Marriage?

In this paper, we assess what neuroscience theory and method have contributed to the study of group processes and intergroup relations and what we see as potential future contributions to the discipline. We briefly review the historical relation between neuroscience and social psychology, identify issues that may limit the value of neuroscience to the study of group processes and relations, and then argue that social neuroscience indeed holds significant promise for understanding many key elements of group processes and intergroup relations. Both the potential problems and the potential benefits of bridging neuroscience and social psychology are considered in terms of theoretical considerations, empirical issues, and practical implications. We conclude that, although not all group phenomena may be reducible to neural activity and pathways, there are significant benefits to social psychology by having an even broader multidisciplinary orientation within social psychology, one that incorporates the complementary perspectives, techniques, and knowledge of neuroscience

Know-how, intellectualism, and memory systems

ABSTRACTA longstanding tradition in philosophy distinguishes between knowthatand know-how. This traditional “anti-intellectualist” view is soentrenched in folk psychology that it is often invoked in supportof an allegedly equivalent distinction between explicit and implicitmemory, derived from the so-called “standard model of memory.”In the last two decades, the received philosophical view has beenchallenged by an “intellectualist” view of know-how. Surprisingly, defenders of the anti-intellectualist view have turned to the cognitivescience of memory, and to the standard model in particular, todefend their view. Here, I argue that this strategy is a mistake. As it turns out, upon closer scrutiny, the evidence from cognitivepsychology and neuroscience of memory does not support theanti-intellectualist approach, mainly because the standard modelof memory is likely wrong. However, this need not be interpretedas good news for the intellectualist, for it is not clear that theempirical evidence necessarily supp..

Auditory Priming within and across Modalities: Evidence from Positron Emission Tomography

Previous neuroimaging studies of perceptual priming have reported priming-related decreases in the extrastriate cortex. However, because these experiments have used visual stimuli, it is unclear whether the observed decreases are associated specifically with some aspect of visual perceptual processing or with more general aspects of priming. We studied within-and cross-modality priming using an auditory word stem completion paradigm. Positron emission tomography (PET) images were obtained during stem completion and a fixation task. Within-modality auditory priming was associated with blood flow decreases in the extrastriate cortex (bilateral), medial/ right anterior prefrontal cortex, right angular gyrus, and precuneus. In cross-modality priming, the study list was presented visually, and subjects completed auditory word stems. Cross-modality priming was associated with trends for blood flow decreases in the left angular gyrus and increases in the medial/right anterior prefrontal cortex. Results thus indicate that reduced activity in the extrastriate cortex accompanies within-modality priming in both visual and auditory modalities.Psycholog

Lesion-symptom mapping corroborates lateralization of verbal and nonverbal memory processes and identifies distributed brain networks responsible for memory dysfunction.

Memory disorders are a common consequence of cerebrovascular accident (CVA). However, uncertainties remain about the exact anatomical correlates of memory impairment and the material-specific lateralization of memory function in the brain. We used lesion-symptom mapping (LSM) in patients with first-time CVA to identify which brain structures are pivotal for verbal and nonverbal memory and to re-examine whether verbal and nonverbal memory functions are lateralized processes in the brain. The cognitive performance of a relatively large cohort of 114 patients in five classic episodic memory tests was analysed with factor analysis. Two factors were extracted that distinguished the verbal and nonverbal components of these memory tests, and their scores were subsequently tested for anatomical correlates by combining univariate and multivariate LSM. LSM analysis revealed for the verbal factor exclusively left-hemispheric insular, subcortical and adjacent white matter regions and for the nonverbal factor exclusively right-hemispheric temporal, occipital, insular, subcortical and adjacent white matter structures. These results corroborate the long-standing hypothesis of a material-specific lateralization of memory function in the brain and confirm a robust association between right temporal lobe lesions and nonverbal memory dysfunction. The right-hemispheric correlates for the nonverbal aspects of episodic memory include not only classic memory structures in the medial temporal lobe but also a more distributed network that includes cortical and subcortical structures also known for implicit memory processes