Coexpression Network Analysis of miRNA-142 Overexpression in Neuronal Cells

MicroRNAs are small noncoding RNA molecules, which are differentially expressed in diverse biological processes and are also involved in the regulation of multiple genes. A number of sites in the 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of different mRNAs allow complimentary binding for a microRNA, leading to their posttranscriptional regulation. The miRNA-142 is one of the microRNAs overexpressed in neurons that is found to regulate SIRT1 and MAOA genes. Differential analysis of gene expression data, which is focused on identifying up- or downregulated genes, ignores many relationships between genes affected by miRNA-142 overexpression in a cell. Thus, we applied a correlation network model to identify the coexpressed genes and to study the impact of miRNA-142 overexpression on this network. Combining multiple sources of knowledge is useful to infer meaningful relationships in systems biology. We applied coexpression model on the data obtained from wild type and miR-142 overexpression neuronal cells and integrated miRNA seed sequence mapping information to identify genes greatly affected by this overexpression. Larger differences in the enriched networks revealed that the nervous system development related genes such as TEAD2, PLEKHA6, and POGLUT1 were greatly impacted due to miRNA-142 overexpression

Unifying diseases through common genetic mechanisms: the example of the genetic theory of infectious diseases

International audienceIn the contemporary biomedical literature, every disease is considered genetic. This extension of the concept of genetic disease is usually interpreted either in a trivial or genocentrist sense, but it is never taken seriously as the expression of a genetic theory of disease. However, a group of French researchers defend the idea of a genetic theory of infectious diseases. By identifying four common genetic mechanisms (Mendelian predisposition to multiple infections, Mendelian predisposition to one infection, and major gene and polygenic predispositions), they attempt to unify infectious diseases from a genetic point of view. In this article, I analyze this explicit example of a genetic theory relying on mechanisms and applied only to a specific category of diseases, what we call ''a regional genetic theory.'' I have three aims: to prove that a genetic theory of disease can be devoid of genocentrism, to consider the possibility of a genetic theory applied to every disease, and to introduce two hypotheses about the form that such a genetic theory could take by distinguishing between a genetic theory of diseases and a genetic theory of Disease. Finally, I suggest that network medicine could be an interesting framework for a genetic theory of Disease.Dans la littérature biomédicale contemporaine, toute maladie est considérée comme génétique. L'extension du concept de maladie génétique est généralement interprétée dans un sens trivial ou génocentriste mais elle n'est jamais prise au sérieux comme l'expression d'une théorie génétique de la maladie. Cependant, un groupe de chercheurs français défendent l'idée d'une théorie génétique des maladies infectieuses. En identifiant quatre mécanismes génétiques communs (prédisposition mendélienne à de multiples infections, prédisposition mendélienne à une infection, gène majeur et prédisposition polygénique), ils essaient d'unifier les maladies infectieuses du point de vue génétique. Dans cet article, j'analyse cet exemple explicite d'une théorie génétique reposant sur des mécanismes et qui s'applique seulement à une catégorie spécifique de maladies, ce que j'appelle "une théorie génétique régionale". Je poursuis trois objectifs : prouver qu'une théorie génétique de la maladie peut être dénuée de génocentrisme, considérer la possibilité d'une théorie génétique appliquée à toutes les maladies et introduire deux hypothèses sur la forme qu'une telle théorie génétique pourrait prendre en distinguant d'une part "une théorie génétique des maladies" et "une théorie génétique de la Maladie". Enfin, je suggère que la médecine des réseaux pourrait constituer un cadre intéressant pour une théorie génétique de la Maladie

A comparison study of multivariate fixed models and Gene Association with Multiple Traits (GAMuT) for nextâ generation sequencing

In this paper, extensive simulations are performed to compare two statistical methods to analyze multiple correlated quantitative phenotypes: (1) approximate Fâ distributed tests of multivariate functional linear models (MFLM) and additive models of multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA), and (2) Gene Association with Multiple Traits (GAMuT) for association testing of highâ dimensional genotype data. It is shown that approximate Fâ distributed tests of MFLM and MANOVA have higher power and are more appropriate for major gene association analysis (i.e., scenarios in which some genetic variants have relatively large effects on the phenotypes); GAMuT has higher power and is more appropriate for analyzing polygenic effects (i.e., effects from a large number of genetic variants each of which contributes a small amount to the phenotypes). MFLM and MANOVA are very flexible and can be used to perform association analysis for (i) rare variants, (ii) common variants, and (iii) a combination of rare and common variants. Although GAMuT was designed to analyze rare variants, it can be applied to analyze a combination of rare and common variants and it performs well when (1) the number of genetic variants is large and (2) each variant contributes a small amount to the phenotypes (i.e., polygenes). MFLM and MANOVA are fixed effect models that perform well for major gene association analysis. GAMuT can be viewed as an extension of sequence kernel association tests (SKAT). Both GAMuT and SKAT are more appropriate for analyzing polygenic effects and they perform well not only in the rare variant case, but also in the case of a combination of rare and common variants. Data analyses of European cohorts and the Trinity Students Study are presented to compare the performance of the two methods.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135654/1/gepi22014_am.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135654/2/gepi22014-sup0001-Suppmat.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135654/3/gepi22014.pd

Using Transcription Modules to Identify Expression Clusters Perturbed in Williams-Beuren Syndrome

The genetic dissection of the phenotypes associated with Williams-Beuren Syndrome (WBS) is advancing thanks to the study of individuals carrying typical or atypical structural rearrangements, as well as in vitro and animal studies. However, little is known about the global dysregulations caused by the WBS deletion. We profiled the transcriptomes of skin fibroblasts from WBS patients and compared them to matched controls. We identified 868 differentially expressed genes that were significantly enriched in extracellular matrix genes, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes, as well as genes in which the products localize to the postsynaptic membrane. We then used public expression datasets from human fibroblasts to establish transcription modules, sets of genes coexpressed in this cell type. We identified those sets in which the average gene expression was altered in WBS samples. Dysregulated modules are often interconnected and share multiple common genes, suggesting that intricate regulatory networks connected by a few central genes are disturbed in WBS. This modular approach increases the power to identify pathways dysregulated in WBS patients, thus providing a testable set of additional candidates for genes and their interactions that modulate the WBS phenotypes

Gene-Disease Network Analysis Reveals Functional Modules in Mendelian, Complex and Environmental Diseases

Scientists have been trying to understand the molecular mechanisms of diseases to design preventive and therapeutic strategies for a long time. For some diseases, it has become evident that it is not enough to obtain a catalogue of the disease-related genes but to uncover how disruptions of molecular networks in the cell give rise to disease phenotypes. Moreover, with the unprecedented wealth of information available, even obtaining such catalogue is extremely difficult. We developed a comprehensive gene-disease association database by integrating associations from several sources that cover different biomedical aspects of diseases. In particular, we focus on the current knowledge of human genetic diseases including mendelian, complex and environmental diseases. To assess the concept of modularity of human diseases, we performed a systematic study of the emergent properties of human gene-disease networks by means of network topology and functional annotation analysis. The results indicate a highly shared genetic origin of human diseases and show that for most diseases, including mendelian, complex and environmental diseases, functional modules exist. Moreover, a core set of biological pathways is found to be associated with most human diseases. We obtained similar results when studying clusters of diseases, suggesting that related diseases might arise due to dysfunction of common biological processes in the cell. For the first time, we include mendelian, complex and environmental diseases in an integrated gene-disease association database and show that the concept of modularity applies for all of them. We furthermore provide a functional analysis of disease-related modules providing important new biological insights, which might not be discovered when considering each of the gene-disease association repositories independently. Hence, we present a suitable framework for the study of how genetic and environmental factors, such as drugs, contribute to diseases. The gene-disease networks used in this study and part of the analysis are available at http://ibi.imim.es/DisGeNET/DisGeNETweb.html#Download

Quantitative analysis of proteins which are members of the same protein complex but cause locus heterogeneity in disease.

peer reviewedIt is still largely unknown how mutations in different genes cause similar diseases - a condition known as locus heterogeneity. A likely explanation is that the different proteins encoded by the locus heterogeneity genes participate in the same biological function and, specifically, that they belong to the same protein complex. Here we report that, in up to 30% of the instances of locus heterogeneity, the disease-causing proteins are indeed members of the same protein complex. Moreover, we observed that, in many instances, the diseases and protein complexes only partially intersect. Among the possible explanations, we surmised that some genes that encode proteins in the complex have not yet been reported as causing disease and are therefore candidate disease genes. Mutations of known human disease genes and murine orthologs of candidate disease genes that encode proteins in the same protein complex do in fact often cause similar phenotypes in humans and mice. Furthermore, we found that the disease-complex intersection is not only incomplete but also non-univocal, with many examples of one disease intersecting more than one protein complex or one protein complex intersecting more than one disease. These limits notwithstanding, this study shows that action on proteins in the same complex is a widespread pathogenic mechanism underlying numerous instances of locus heterogeneity