107,376 research outputs found
An empirical learning-based validation procedure for simulation workflow
Simulation workflow is a top-level model for the design and control of
simulation process. It connects multiple simulation components with time and
interaction restrictions to form a complete simulation system. Before the
construction and evaluation of the component models, the validation of
upper-layer simulation workflow is of the most importance in a simulation
system. However, the methods especially for validating simulation workflow is
very limit. Many of the existing validation techniques are domain-dependent
with cumbersome questionnaire design and expert scoring. Therefore, this paper
present an empirical learning-based validation procedure to implement a
semi-automated evaluation for simulation workflow. First, representative
features of general simulation workflow and their relations with validation
indices are proposed. The calculation process of workflow credibility based on
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is then introduced. In order to make full use
of the historical data and implement more efficient validation, four learning
algorithms, including back propagation neural network (BPNN), extreme learning
machine (ELM), evolving new-neuron (eNFN) and fast incremental gaussian mixture
model (FIGMN), are introduced for constructing the empirical relation between
the workflow credibility and its features. A case study on a landing-process
simulation workflow is established to test the feasibility of the proposed
procedure. The experimental results also provide some useful overview of the
state-of-the-art learning algorithms on the credibility evaluation of
simulation models
What Can Artificial Intelligence Do for Scientific Realism?
The paper proposes a synthesis between human scientists and artificial representation learning models as a way of augmenting epistemic warrants of realist theories against various anti-realist attempts. Towards this end, the paper fleshes out unconceived alternatives not as a critique of scientific realism but rather a reinforcement, as it rejects the retrospective interpretations of scientific progress, which brought about the problem of alternatives in the first place. By utilising adversarial machine learning, the synthesis explores possibility spaces of available evidence for unconceived alternatives providing modal knowledge of what is possible therein. As a result, the epistemic warrant of synthesised realist theories should emerge bolstered as the underdetermination by available evidence gets reduced. While shifting the realist commitment away from theoretical artefacts towards modalities of the possibility spaces, the synthesis comes out as a kind of perspectival modelling
AutoDiscern: Rating the Quality of Online Health Information with Hierarchical Encoder Attention-based Neural Networks
Patients increasingly turn to search engines and online content before, or in
place of, talking with a health professional. Low quality health information,
which is common on the internet, presents risks to the patient in the form of
misinformation and a possibly poorer relationship with their physician. To
address this, the DISCERN criteria (developed at University of Oxford) are used
to evaluate the quality of online health information. However, patients are
unlikely to take the time to apply these criteria to the health websites they
visit. We built an automated implementation of the DISCERN instrument (Brief
version) using machine learning models. We compared the performance of a
traditional model (Random Forest) with that of a hierarchical encoder
attention-based neural network (HEA) model using two language embeddings, BERT
and BioBERT. The HEA BERT and BioBERT models achieved average F1-macro scores
across all criteria of 0.75 and 0.74, respectively, outperforming the Random
Forest model (average F1-macro = 0.69). Overall, the neural network based
models achieved 81% and 86% average accuracy at 100% and 80% coverage,
respectively, compared to 94% manual rating accuracy. The attention mechanism
implemented in the HEA architectures not only provided 'model explainability'
by identifying reasonable supporting sentences for the documents fulfilling the
Brief DISCERN criteria, but also boosted F1 performance by 0.05 compared to the
same architecture without an attention mechanism. Our research suggests that it
is feasible to automate online health information quality assessment, which is
an important step towards empowering patients to become informed partners in
the healthcare process
Recommended from our members
Disruptive Innovations and Disruptive Assurance: Assuring Machine Learning and Autonomy
Autonomous and machine learning-based systems are disruptive innovations and thus require a corresponding disruptive assurance strategy. We offer an overview of a framework based on claims, arguments, and evidence aimed at addressing these systems and use it to identify specific gaps, challenges, and potential solutions
- …