13,916 research outputs found
A push–relabel approximation algorithm for approximating the minimum-degree MST problem and its generalization to matroids
AbstractIn the minimum-degree minimum spanning tree (MDMST) problem, we are given a graph G, and the goal is to find a minimum spanning tree (MST) T, such that the maximum degree of T is as small as possible. This problem is NP-hard and generalizes the Hamiltonian path problem. We give an algorithm that outputs an MST of degree at most 2Δopt (G)+o(Δopt (G)), where Δopt (G) denotes the degree of the optimal tree. This result improves on a previous result of Fischer [T. Fischer, Optimizing the degree of minimum weight spanning trees. Technical Report 14853, Dept. of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1993] that finds an MST of degree at most bΔopt (G)+logbn, for any b>1.The MDMST problem is a special case of the following problem: given a k-ary hypergraph G=(V,E) and weighted matroid M with E as its ground set, find a minimum-cost basis (MCB) T of M such that the degree of T in G is as small as possible. Our algorithm immediately generalizes to this problem, finding an MCB of degree at most k2Δopt (G,M)+O(kkΔopt (G,M)).We use the push–relabel framework developed by Goldberg [A. V. Goldberg, A new max-flow algorithm, Technical Report MIT/LCS/TM-291, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985 (Technical Report)] for the maximum-flow problem. To our knowledge, this is the first use of the push–relabel technique in an approximation algorithm for an NP-hard problem.The MDMST problem is closely connected to the bounded-degree minimum spanning tree (BDMST) problem. Given a graph G and degree bound B on its nodes, the BDMST problem is to find a minimum cost spanning tree among the spanning trees with maximum degree B. Previous algorithms for this problem by Könemann and Ravi [J. Könemann, R. Ravi, A matter of degree: Improved approximation algorithms for degree-bounded minimum spanning trees, SIAM Journal on Computing 31(6) (2002) 1783–1793; J. Könemann, R. Ravi, Primal-dual meets local search: Approximating MST’s with nonuniform degree bounds, in: Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2003, pp. 389–395] and by Chaudhuri et al. [K. Chaudhuri, S. Rao, S. Riesenfeld, K. Talwar, What would Edmonds do? Augmenting paths and witnesses for bounded degree MSTs, in: Proceedings of APPROX/RANDOM, 2005, pp. 26–39] incur a near-logarithmic additive error in the degree. We give the first BDMST algorithm that approximates both the degree and the cost to within a constant factor of the optimum. These results generalize to the case of nonuniform degree bounds
Near-linear Time Algorithm for Approximate Minimum Degree Spanning Trees
Given a graph , we wish to compute a spanning tree whose maximum
vertex degree, i.e. tree degree, is as small as possible. Computing the exact
optimal solution is known to be NP-hard, since it generalizes the Hamiltonian
path problem. For the approximation version of this problem, a
time algorithm that computes a spanning tree of degree at most is
previously known [F\"urer \& Raghavachari 1994]; here denotes the
minimum tree degree of all the spanning trees. In this paper we give the first
near-linear time approximation algorithm for this problem. Specifically
speaking, we propose an time algorithm that
computes a spanning tree with tree degree for any constant .
Thus, when , we can achieve approximate solutions with
constant approximate ratio arbitrarily close to 1 in near-linear time.Comment: 17 page
Bicriteria Network Design Problems
We study a general class of bicriteria network design problems. A generic
problem in this class is as follows: Given an undirected graph and two
minimization objectives (under different cost functions), with a budget
specified on the first, find a <subgraph \from a given subgraph-class that
minimizes the second objective subject to the budget on the first. We consider
three different criteria - the total edge cost, the diameter and the maximum
degree of the network. Here, we present the first polynomial-time approximation
algorithms for a large class of bicriteria network design problems for the
above mentioned criteria. The following general types of results are presented.
First, we develop a framework for bicriteria problems and their
approximations. Second, when the two criteria are the same %(note that the cost
functions continue to be different) we present a ``black box'' parametric
search technique. This black box takes in as input an (approximation) algorithm
for the unicriterion situation and generates an approximation algorithm for the
bicriteria case with only a constant factor loss in the performance guarantee.
Third, when the two criteria are the diameter and the total edge costs we use a
cluster-based approach to devise a approximation algorithms --- the solutions
output violate both the criteria by a logarithmic factor. Finally, for the
class of treewidth-bounded graphs, we provide pseudopolynomial-time algorithms
for a number of bicriteria problems using dynamic programming. We show how
these pseudopolynomial-time algorithms can be converted to fully
polynomial-time approximation schemes using a scaling technique.Comment: 24 pages 1 figur
A Framework for Algorithm Stability
We say that an algorithm is stable if small changes in the input result in
small changes in the output. This kind of algorithm stability is particularly
relevant when analyzing and visualizing time-varying data. Stability in general
plays an important role in a wide variety of areas, such as numerical analysis,
machine learning, and topology, but is poorly understood in the context of
(combinatorial) algorithms. In this paper we present a framework for analyzing
the stability of algorithms. We focus in particular on the tradeoff between the
stability of an algorithm and the quality of the solution it computes. Our
framework allows for three types of stability analysis with increasing degrees
of complexity: event stability, topological stability, and Lipschitz stability.
We demonstrate the use of our stability framework by applying it to kinetic
Euclidean minimum spanning trees
Detecting Activations over Graphs using Spanning Tree Wavelet Bases
We consider the detection of activations over graphs under Gaussian noise,
where signals are piece-wise constant over the graph. Despite the wide
applicability of such a detection algorithm, there has been little success in
the development of computationally feasible methods with proveable theoretical
guarantees for general graph topologies. We cast this as a hypothesis testing
problem, and first provide a universal necessary condition for asymptotic
distinguishability of the null and alternative hypotheses. We then introduce
the spanning tree wavelet basis over graphs, a localized basis that reflects
the topology of the graph, and prove that for any spanning tree, this approach
can distinguish null from alternative in a low signal-to-noise regime. Lastly,
we improve on this result and show that using the uniform spanning tree in the
basis construction yields a randomized test with stronger theoretical
guarantees that in many cases matches our necessary conditions. Specifically,
we obtain near-optimal performance in edge transitive graphs, -nearest
neighbor graphs, and -graphs
Squarepants in a Tree: Sum of Subtree Clustering and Hyperbolic Pants Decomposition
We provide efficient constant factor approximation algorithms for the
problems of finding a hierarchical clustering of a point set in any metric
space, minimizing the sum of minimimum spanning tree lengths within each
cluster, and in the hyperbolic or Euclidean planes, minimizing the sum of
cluster perimeters. Our algorithms for the hyperbolic and Euclidean planes can
also be used to provide a pants decomposition, that is, a set of disjoint
simple closed curves partitioning the plane minus the input points into subsets
with exactly three boundary components, with approximately minimum total
length. In the Euclidean case, these curves are squares; in the hyperbolic
case, they combine our Euclidean square pants decomposition with our tree
clustering method for general metric spaces.Comment: 22 pages, 14 figures. This version replaces the proof of what is now
Lemma 5.2, as the previous proof was erroneou
- …