708 research outputs found

    Asynchronous Graph Pattern Matching on Multiprocessor Systems

    Full text link
    Pattern matching on large graphs is the foundation for a variety of application domains. Strict latency requirements and continuously increasing graph sizes demand the usage of highly parallel in-memory graph processing engines that need to consider non-uniform memory access (NUMA) and concurrency issues to scale up on modern multiprocessor systems. To tackle these aspects, graph partitioning becomes increasingly important. Hence, we present a technique to process graph pattern matching on NUMA systems in this paper. As a scalable pattern matching processing infrastructure, we leverage a data-oriented architecture that preserves data locality and minimizes concurrency-related bottlenecks on NUMA systems. We show in detail, how graph pattern matching can be asynchronously processed on a multiprocessor system.Comment: 14 Pages, Extended version for ADBIS 201

    Graph Pattern Matching on Symmetric Multiprocessor Systems

    Get PDF
    Graph-structured data can be found in nearly every aspect of today's world, be it road networks, social networks or the internet itself. From a processing perspective, finding comprehensive patterns in graph-structured data is a core processing primitive in a variety of applications, such as fraud detection, biological engineering or social graph analytics. On the hardware side, multiprocessor systems, that consist of multiple processors in a single scale-up server, are the next important wave on top of multi-core systems. In particular, symmetric multiprocessor systems (SMP) are characterized by the fact, that each processor has the same architecture, e.g. every processor is a multi-core and all multiprocessors share a common and huge main memory space. Moreover, large SMPs will feature a non-uniform memory access (NUMA), whose impact on the design of efficient data processing concepts should not be neglected. The efficient usage of SMP systems, that still increase in size, is an interesting and ongoing research topic. Current state-of-the-art architectural design principles provide different and in parts disjunct suggestions on which data should be partitioned and or how intra-process communication should be realized. In this thesis, we propose a new synthesis of four of the most well-known principles Shared Everything, Partition Serial Execution, Data Oriented Architecture and Delegation, to create the NORAD architecture, which stands for NUMA-aware DORA with Delegation. We built our research prototype called NeMeSys on top of the NORAD architecture to fully exploit the provided hardware capacities of SMPs for graph pattern matching. Being an in-memory engine, NeMeSys allows for online data ingestion as well as online query generation and processing through a terminal based user interface. Storing a graph on a NUMA system inherently requires data partitioning to cope with the mentioned NUMA effect. Hence, we need to dissect the graph into a disjunct set of partitions, which can then be stored on the individual memory domains. This thesis analyzes the capabilites of the NORAD architecture, to perform scalable graph pattern matching on SMP systems. To increase the systems performance, we further develop, integrate and evaluate suitable optimization techniques. That is, we investigate the influence of the inherent data partitioning, the interplay of messaging with and without sufficient locality information and the actual partition placement on any NUMA socket in the system. To underline the applicability of our approach, we evaluate NeMeSys against synthetic datasets and perform an end-to-end evaluation of the whole system stack on the real world knowledge graph of Wikidata

    GraphGrind: addressing load imbalance of graph partitioning

    Get PDF
    The incidence of HCAIs before and after antimicrobial stewardship. Incidence of VAP, CRBSI and CAUTI were defined as the number of VAP, CRBSI and CAUTI patients per 1000 ventilation days, per 1000 central venous catheter days and per 1000 urine-catheter days, respectively. (DOCX 15 kb
    corecore