2 research outputs found
์ํ ๋ฌ์ฐฉ๋ฅ์ ๊ณผ ๋ก๋ฒ์ ๋ฌ ๋ฐค๊ธฐ๊ฐ ์์กด์ ์ํ ๋น์ฉ ํจ์จ์ ์ด์ ์ด ์์คํ
ํ์๋
ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ์ฌ) -- ์์ธ๋ํ๊ต ๋ํ์ : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋ํ ๊ธฐ๊ณํญ๊ณต๊ณตํ๋ถ, 2020. 8. ๊น๊ทํ.A lunar day is equivalent to a month on the Earth. As a result, the daylight period of a lunar day is extremely hot due to two weeks of sunlight, and lunar nights are extremely cold due to the lack of sunlight for an equally long period. During lunar nights, lunar probes have no energy access from sunlight, and are required to withstand two weeks under extremely cold conditions.
Various devices have been proposed as solutions to ensure lunar landers and rovers are able to withstand two-week-long lunar nights. Certain methods utilize radioisotope heating units (RHU) and radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTG), the heat source device and electric generator of lunar probes, respectively. In addition, radiator lids, which are thermal switches, have been applied for this purpose. Recently suggested ideas include thermal wadis, which are thermal storage devices, and devices that store energy from under the lunar surface during the lunar daytime.
As such thermal stability devices are accompanied with problems such as high costs, safety problems, or limitations in terms of weight or design, small lunar probes opt to forsake survival during the two-week-long lunar night and are instead designed for missions during the two-week daytime period.๋ฌ์ ํ๋ฃจ๋ ์ง๊ตฌ์ ํ๋ฌ์ ํด๋นํ๋ฉฐ, ํ์์ด ๋น์น๋ ๋ฌ์ 2์ฃผ๋์์ ๋งค์ฐ ๋จ๊ฑฐ์ด ์ํ์ ๋ฌ์ ๋ฎ๊ธฐ๊ฐ์ด๊ณ , ํ์์ด ๋น์น์ง ์๋ ๋ฌ์ 2์ฃผ๋์์ ๋งค์ฐ ์ฐจ๊ฐ์ด ๋ฌ์ ๋ฐค๊ธฐ๊ฐ์ด๋ค. ๋ฌ ํ์ฌ์ ์ ๋ฌ์ ๋ฐค๊ธฐ๊ฐ๋์ ํ์์ผ๋ก๋ถํฐ์ ์๋์ง ๊ณต๊ธ๋ ์๊ณ , ๋งค์ฐ ์ถ์ด ์ฃผ๋ณ ํ๊ฒฝ ๊ฐ์ด๋ฐ์ 2์ฃผ๊ฐ์ ๊ธด ๊ธฐ๊ฐ์ ๋ฒํ
จ์ผ ํ๋ค.
๋ฌ ํ์ฌ๋ฅผ ์ํ ์ฐฉ๋ฅ์ ๊ณผ ๋ก๋ฒ์๋ 2์ฃผ๋์์ ๋ฌ์ ๋ฐค๊ธฐ๊ฐ๋์ ์์กดํ๊ธฐ ์ํด ๊ทธ๋์ ์ฌ๋ฌ๊ฐ์ง ์ฅ์น๊ฐ ์ ์๋๊ณ ์๋๋์ด ์๋ค. ๋ฌ์ ๋ฐค๊ธฐ๊ฐ๋์ ๋ฌ ํ์ฌ์ ์ ์ด ๊ณต๊ธ์ฅ์น์ธ RHU(Radioisotope Heating Unit), ํน์ ์ ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ์์ฅ์น์ธ RTG(Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator)๋ฑ์ด ์ฌ์ฉ๋์ด ์๊ณ , ์ด ๊ฐํ์ฅ์น์ธ Radiator Lid๋ฑ์ด ์ฌ์ฉ๋์๋ค. ์ต๊ทผ์๋ ์ด ์ ์ฅ ์ฅ์น์ธ Thermal Wadi๋ ๋ฌ์ ์งํ๋ฉด ์๋์ ๋ฌ์ ๋ฎ๊ธฐ๊ฐ ๋์ ์๋์ง๋ฅผ ์ ์ฅํ๋ ์ฅ์น ๋ฑ์ ์์ด๋์ด๋ ์ ์๋์๋ค.
์ด์ ๊ฐ์ ์จ๋ ์ ์ง์ฅ์น๋ค์ ๊ฐ๊ฒฉ์ ์ธ ๋ฌธ์ ๋ ์์ ๋ฌธ์ ํน์ ๋ฌด๊ฒ๋ ๊ตฌํ์ ์ด๋ ค์ ๋ฑ์ ๋ฌธ์ ์ ์ ๋๋ฐํ๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์, ์ํ ๋ฌํ์ฌ์ ์ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ์๋ ๋ฌ ๋ฐค ๊ธฐ๊ฐ ๋์์ ์์กด์ ํฌ๊ธฐํ๊ณ ๋ฌ์ ๋ฎ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ์ธ 2์ฃผ๋์๋ง์ ์๋ฌด๊ธฐ๊ฐ์ผ๋ก ์ค๊ณ๋์ด ์ ์๋๊ธฐ๋ ํ์๋ค.
๋ณธ ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์์๋ ์ํ ๋ฌ์ฐฉ๋ฅ์ ๊ณผ ๋ก๋ฒ๋ 2์ฃผ๋์์ ๋ฌ์ ๋ฐค๊ธฐ๊ฐ๋์ ์์กดํ ์ ์๋ ์์ด๋์ด๋ฅผ ์ ์ํ์๋๋ฐ, ๊ทธ๊ฒ์ MLI (Multi-Layer Insulation) curtain system์ด๋ค. MLI curtain system์ ๋ฌ ์ฐฉ๋ฅ์ ์ Lid์ RHU๋ฑ์ ์ฅ์น๋ฅผ ์ ์ฉํ์ฌ ๋ฌ์ ๋ฐค ๊ธฐ๊ฐ ๋์ ์์กดํ ์ ์๋๋ก ํ๊ณ , ๋ฌ ํ์ฌ ๋ก๋ฒ๋ ๋ฌ ์ฐฉ๋ฅ์ ์ MLI curtain ์์ shelter๋ก ์ด๋ํ์ฌ ์์กดํ ์ ์๋๋ก ์ค๊ณ๋ ์์คํ
์ด๋ค. MLI curtain system์ ์ํ ๋ก๋ฒ์ ๋ฌ ๋ฐค ๊ธฐ๊ฐ ์์กด์ ์ํ์ฌ ๊ทธ ์์ด๋์ด๊ฐ ๊ฐ๋จํ๊ณ ์ ์ ๋น์ฉ์ผ๋ก๋ ๊ตฌํํ ์ ์๋ ์ฅ์ ์ ๊ฐ๋๋ค.
๋ณธ ๋
ผ๋ฌธ์์๋ MLI curtain system์ ์คํ ๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ์ ์ฆ๋ช
ํ๊ธฐ ์ํด ์ผ๋ฐ์ ์ธ ์ฐ์ฃผ๋นํ์ฒด ์ด์ค๊ณ ์ดํด์ ๊ณผ์ ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ์ด์ค๊ณ์ ์ดํด์์ ์ํํ์๊ณ , ์ด์ค๊ณ ์๊ตฌ์กฐ๊ฑด์ ๋ถํฉํ๋ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฌผ์ ์ป์๋ค. ๋ฟ๋ง ์๋๋ผ MLI curtain system feasibility๋ฅผ ํฅ์์ํค๊ธฐ ์ํด ์ด์ ์ด ๋ฟ๋ง ์๋๋ผ ๊ตฌ์กฐ, ์ ๋ ฅ, ์ํํธ์จ์ด ์ธก๋ฉด์์ ๊ณ ๋ คํ ์ ๋ ๋
ผํ์์ผ๋ฉฐ, MLI curtain system์ ์์ ์ฑ์ ํฅ์์ํค๊ธฐ ์ํ ์์ด๋์ด๋ ์ ์ํ์๋ค. ๊ทธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ MLI curtain system์ ์ํ ๋ก๋ฒ์ ๊ธด ์๋ฌด๊ธฐ๊ฐ ๋์์ ์์กด์ ์ํด ์คํ ๊ฐ๋ฅํ๊ณ ์ ํฉํ ์์ด๋์ด์์ ์ฆ๋ช
ํ ์ ์์๋ค.CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 History of Lunar Exploration Programs 1
1.2 Specifications of Unmanned Lunar Rovers 4
1.3 Thesis Objective and Proposal 9
CHAPTER 2. THERMAL DESIGN OF LUNAR EXPLORATION VEHICLES 11
2.1 General Spacecraft Thermal Design Process 11
2.2 Thermal Environment of the Moon. 16
2.3 Thermal Hardware of Lunar Exploration Vehicles . 20
2.4 Thermal Design of Lunar Landers and Rovers . 31
CHAPTER 3. METHODS OF LUNAR NIGHT SURVIVAL 33
3.1 Nuclear Energy 33
3.2 Lid System 34
3.3 Feasible Proposals. 36
3.4 A Proposal of MLI Curtain System. 39
3.5 Cost Effectiveness of MLI Curtain System. 42
CHAPTER 4. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MLI CURTAIN SYSTEM. 44
4.1 Technical Challenges of the MLI Curtain System 44
4.2 The Shape of MLI Curtain 51
4.3 Suggestion of the Rover without Solar Cells 52
CHAPTER 5. THERMAL MODELING. 53
5.1 Governing Equation 53
5.2 Thermal Modeling Method of Lunar Surface . 58
5.3 Thermal Modeling of Lunar Regolith and Verification. 63
5.4 Thermal Modeling of the Lunar Lander and the Rover 69
CHAPTER 6. THERMAL ANALYSIS . 75
6.1 Thermal Design Requirements of the Lander and Rover 75
6.2 Thermal Analysis Case 76
6.3 Analysis Result of the Radiator Area and a Number of RHU. 81
6.4 Temperature Trends of the Lunar Lander and the Rover 83
6.5 Analysis of the Influence of the RHUs and Lid 94
6.6 Regolith Temperature Analysis according to the Effect of the MLI Curtain 96
6.7 Thermal Analysis considering the Fluff Layer being Blown Away 98
6.8 Summary of Thermal Analysis Results. 102
CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSIONS 103
REFERENCES. 105
์ด ๋ก 112Docto
Recommended from our members
A Systematic Process for Assessing Human Spacecraft Designs in Terms of Relative Safety and Operational Characteristics
The research efforts in this dissertation are focused on reducing uncertainty in the conceptual design phase through a process of establishing a minimum functionality baseline before trading Safety and Operability in proposed spacecraft configurations. The challenge in human spacecraft development is how to combine the parts into a working design that complies with many requirements for top level mission objectives, safety, and mission success. The design methodologies presented here provides designers and decision makers with additional methods that provide an overall view of candidate design concepts. This work establishes a definition for a minimum functional design and is the first to group the fundamental mass parameters of a human spacecraft in the categories of Physics, Physiology, Safety, and Operability. The minimum functional baseline configuration described in this work is different from previous approaches because it eliminates the bias toward a minimum set of requirements. The amount of Safety in the spacecraft is the mass dedicated to safety through similar or dissimilar redundancy, safety components, margins, and dispersions. The amount of Operability in the spacecraft is the mass used to perform mission objectives and make functions easier or efficient. Because human spacecraft are highly coupled systems, the introduction of mass in one subsystem has downstream effects on other subsystems that are not easily recognized by designers and the use of rapidly reconfigurable prototypes allows designers and multidisciplinary teams to utilize Boundary Objects as a means of communication for maturing designs. The mass addition process coupled with the minimum functionality approach creates a tradespace of spacecraft configurations and provides designers with an overall view of how various levels of Safety or Operability will affect the overall spacecraft mass. The decisions made in the conceptual design phase are critical to the success of the program and uncertainty can lead to unnecessary redesign in later phases. The previous methods can be combined into a conceptual design process that couples easily with typical industry approaches to human spacecraft development. The use of minimum functionality as a precursor to more conventional approaches allows the spacecraft configuration to take shape before detailed CAD and higher fidelity analyses