10,371 research outputs found
Time series classification based on fractal properties
The article considers classification task of fractal time series by the meta
algorithms based on decision trees. Binomial multiplicative stochastic cascades
are used as input time series. Comparative analysis of the classification
approaches based on different features is carried out. The results indicate the
advantage of the machine learning methods over the traditional estimating the
degree of self-similarity.Comment: 4 pages, 2 figures, 3 equations, 1 tabl
Multiplicative-Additive Proof Equivalence is Logspace-complete, via Binary Decision Trees
Given a logic presented in a sequent calculus, a natural question is that of
equivalence of proofs: to determine whether two given proofs are equated by any
denotational semantics, ie any categorical interpretation of the logic
compatible with its cut-elimination procedure. This notion can usually be
captured syntactically by a set of rule permutations.
Very generally, proofnets can be defined as combinatorial objects which
provide canonical representatives of equivalence classes of proofs. In
particular, the existence of proof nets for a logic provides a solution to the
equivalence problem of this logic. In certain fragments of linear logic, it is
possible to give a notion of proofnet with good computational properties,
making it a suitable representation of proofs for studying the cut-elimination
procedure, among other things.
It has recently been proved that there cannot be such a notion of proofnets
for the multiplicative (with units) fragment of linear logic, due to the
equivalence problem for this logic being Pspace-complete.
We investigate the multiplicative-additive (without unit) fragment of linear
logic and show it is closely related to binary decision trees: we build a
representation of proofs based on binary decision trees, reducing proof
equivalence to decision tree equivalence, and give a converse encoding of
binary decision trees as proofs. We get as our main result that the complexity
of the proof equivalence problem of the studied fragment is Logspace-complete.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1502.0199
Encrypted statistical machine learning: new privacy preserving methods
We present two new statistical machine learning methods designed to learn on
fully homomorphic encrypted (FHE) data. The introduction of FHE schemes
following Gentry (2009) opens up the prospect of privacy preserving statistical
machine learning analysis and modelling of encrypted data without compromising
security constraints. We propose tailored algorithms for applying extremely
random forests, involving a new cryptographic stochastic fraction estimator,
and na\"{i}ve Bayes, involving a semi-parametric model for the class decision
boundary, and show how they can be used to learn and predict from encrypted
data. We demonstrate that these techniques perform competitively on a variety
of classification data sets and provide detailed information about the
computational practicalities of these and other FHE methods.Comment: 39 page
MALL proof equivalence is Logspace-complete, via binary decision diagrams
Proof equivalence in a logic is the problem of deciding whether two proofs
are equivalent modulo a set of permutation of rules that reflects the
commutative conversions of its cut-elimination procedure. As such, it is
related to the question of proofnets: finding canonical representatives of
equivalence classes of proofs that have good computational properties. It can
also be seen as the word problem for the notion of free category corresponding
to the logic.
It has been recently shown that proof equivalence in MLL (the multiplicative
with units fragment of linear logic) is PSPACE-complete, which rules out any
low-complexity notion of proofnet for this particular logic.
Since it is another fragment of linear logic for which attempts to define a
fully satisfactory low-complexity notion of proofnet have not been successful
so far, we study proof equivalence in MALL- (multiplicative-additive without
units fragment of linear logic) and discover a situation that is totally
different from the MLL case. Indeed, we show that proof equivalence in MALL-
corresponds (under AC0 reductions) to equivalence of binary decision diagrams,
a data structure widely used to represent and analyze Boolean functions
efficiently.
We show these two equivalent problems to be LOGSPACE-complete. If this
technically leaves open the possibility for a complete solution to the question
of proofnets for MALL-, the established relation with binary decision diagrams
actually suggests a negative solution to this problem.Comment: in TLCA 201
Testing Multiplicative Error Models Using Conditional Moment Tests
We suggest a robust form of conditional moment test as a constructive test for func- tional misspecification in multiplicative error models. The proposed test has power solely against violations of the conditional mean restriction but is not affected by any other type of model misspecification. Monte-Carlo investigations show that an appro- priate choice of weighting function induces high power against various alternatives. We illustrate how to adapt the framework to test also out-of-sample moment restrictions, such as orthogonalities of prediction errors.Robust Conditional Moment Tests, Finite Sample Properties, Multiplicative Error Models, Prediction Errors
- âŠ