438,570 research outputs found
A Theoretical Analysis of Cooperative Behavior in Multi-Agent Q-learning
A number of experimental studies have investigated whether cooperative behavior may emerge in multi-agent Q-learning. In some studies cooperative behavior did emerge, in others it did not. This report provides a theoretical analysis of this issue. The analysis focuses on multi-agent Q-learning in iterated prisonerĂ¢â‚¬â„¢s dilemmas. It is shown that under certain assumptions cooperative behavior may emerge when multi-agent Q-learning is applied in an iterated prisonerĂ¢â‚¬â„¢s dilemma. An important consequence of the analysis is that multi-agent Q-learning may result in non-Nash behavior. It is found experimentally that the theoretical results derived in this report are quite robust to violations of the underlying assumptions.Cooperation;Multi-Agent Q-Learning;Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning;Nash Equilibrium;PrisonerĂ¢â‚¬â„¢s Dilemma
Coordinated Multi-Agent Imitation Learning
We study the problem of imitation learning from demonstrations of multiple
coordinating agents. One key challenge in this setting is that learning a good
model of coordination can be difficult, since coordination is often implicit in
the demonstrations and must be inferred as a latent variable. We propose a
joint approach that simultaneously learns a latent coordination model along
with the individual policies. In particular, our method integrates unsupervised
structure learning with conventional imitation learning. We illustrate the
power of our approach on a difficult problem of learning multiple policies for
fine-grained behavior modeling in team sports, where different players occupy
different roles in the coordinated team strategy. We show that having a
coordination model to infer the roles of players yields substantially improved
imitation loss compared to conventional baselines.Comment: International Conference on Machine Learning 201
Arena: A General Evaluation Platform and Building Toolkit for Multi-Agent Intelligence
Learning agents that are not only capable of taking tests, but also
innovating is becoming a hot topic in AI. One of the most promising paths
towards this vision is multi-agent learning, where agents act as the
environment for each other, and improving each agent means proposing new
problems for others. However, existing evaluation platforms are either not
compatible with multi-agent settings, or limited to a specific game. That is,
there is not yet a general evaluation platform for research on multi-agent
intelligence. To this end, we introduce Arena, a general evaluation platform
for multi-agent intelligence with 35 games of diverse logics and
representations. Furthermore, multi-agent intelligence is still at the stage
where many problems remain unexplored. Therefore, we provide a building toolkit
for researchers to easily invent and build novel multi-agent problems from the
provided game set based on a GUI-configurable social tree and five basic
multi-agent reward schemes. Finally, we provide Python implementations of five
state-of-the-art deep multi-agent reinforcement learning baselines. Along with
the baseline implementations, we release a set of 100 best agents/teams that we
can train with different training schemes for each game, as the base for
evaluating agents with population performance. As such, the research community
can perform comparisons under a stable and uniform standard. All the
implementations and accompanied tutorials have been open-sourced for the
community at https://sites.google.com/view/arena-unity/
- …