747,656 research outputs found
Aligning business processes and work practices
Current business process modeling methodologies offer little guidance regarding how to keep business process models aligned with their actual execution. This paper describes how to achieve this goal by uncovering and supervising business process models in connection with work practices using BAM. BAM is a methodology for business process modeling, supervision and improvement that works at two dimensions; the dimension of processes and the dimension of work practices. The business modeling component of BAM is illustrated with a case study in an organizational setting
Refinement of SDBC Business Process Models Using ISDL
Aiming at aligning business process modeling and software specification, the SDBC approach considers a multi-viewpoint modeling where static, dynamic, and data business process aspect models have to be mapped adequately to corresponding static, dynamic, and data software specification aspect models. Next to that, the approach considers also a business process modeling viewpoint which concerns real-life communication and coordination issues, such as meanings, intentions, negotiations, commitments, and obligations. Hence, in order to adequately align communication and dynamic aspect models, SDBC should use at least two modeling techniques. However, the transformation between two techniques unnecessarily complicates the modeling process. Next to that, different techniques use different modeling formalisms whose reflection sometimes causes limitations. For this reason, we explore in the current paper the value which the (modeling) language ISDL could bring to SDBC in the alignment of communication and behavioral (dynamic) business process aspect models; ISDL can usefully refine dynamic process models. Thus, it is feasible to expect that ISDL can complement the SDBC approach, allowing refinement of dynamic business process aspect models, by adding communication and coordination actions. Furthermore, SDBC could benefit from ISDL-related methods assessing whether a realized refinement conforms to the original process model. Our studies in the paper are supported by an illustrative example
Exact Requirements Engineering for Developing Business Process Models
Process modeling is a suitable tool for improving the business processes.
Successful process modeling strongly depends on correct requirements
engineering. In this paper, we proposed a combination approach for requirements
elicitation for developing business models. To do this, BORE (Business-Oriented
Requirements Engineering) method is utilized as the base of our work and it is
enriched by the important features of the BDD (Business-driven development)
method, in order to make the proposed approach appropriate for modeling the
more complex processes. As the main result, our method eventuates in exact
requirements elicitation that adapts the customers' needs. Also, it let us
avoid any rework in the modeling of process. In this paper, we conduct a case
study for the paper submission and publication system of a journal. The results
of this study not only give a good experience of real world application of
proposed approach on a web-based system, also it approves the proficiency of
this approach for modeling the complex systems with many sub-processes and
complicated relationships.Comment: (IEEE) 3th International Conference on Web Researc
Business process verification: a Petri Net approach.
In this report, we discuss the use of Petri Net language theory for business process modeling. Essentially, the focus is on the opportunities of the modeling technique for analysis and verification. Semantic compatibility, as opposed to syntactic compatibility, is concerned with the meaningfulness of the distributedbusiness process. We start with a description and motivation of different notions of semantically compatible business processes. Further, these different types ofcompatibility are formalized by means of Petri Net language theory. Finally, we describe the foundations of an algorithm that enables us to verify the semantic compatibility in an automated way.Keywords: Petri Net theory; Business Process Modeling; Verification; Semantic Com-patibilityBusiness process modeling; Petri Net theory; Semantic compatibility; Verification; Theory; Business; Processes; Process modeling; Opportunities;
Data in Business Process Models. A Preliminary Empirical Study
Traditional activity-centric process modeling languages treat data as simple black boxes acting as input or output for activities. Many alternate and emerging process modeling paradigms, such as case handling and artifact-centric process modeling, give data a more central role. This is achieved by introducing lifecycles and states for data objects, which is beneficial when modeling data-or knowledge-intensive processes. We assume that traditional activity-centric process modeling languages lack the capabilities to adequately capture the complexity of such processes. To verify this assumption we conducted an online interview among BPM experts. The results not only allow us to identify various profiles of persons modeling business processes, but also the problems that exist in contemporary modeling languages w.r.t. The modeling of business data. Overall, this preliminary empirical study confirms the necessity of data-awareness in process modeling notations in general
- ā¦