7 research outputs found
Model-based Bayesian inference of neural activity and connectivity from all-optical interrogation of a neural circuit
Neural information processing systems foundation. All rights reserved. Population activity measurement by calcium imaging can be combined with cellular resolution optogenetic activity perturbations to enable the mapping of neural connectivity in vivo. This requires accurate inference of perturbed and unperturbed neural activity from calcium imaging measurements, which are noisy and indirect, and can also be contaminated by photostimulation artifacts. We have developed a new fully Bayesian approach to jointly inferring spiking activity and neural connectivity from in vivo all-optical perturbation experiments. In contrast to standard approaches that perform spike inference and analysis in two separate maximum-likelihood phases, our joint model is able to propagate uncertainty in spike inference to the inference of connectivity and vice versa. We use the framework of variational autoencoders to model spiking activity using discrete latent variables, low-dimensional latent common input, and sparse spike-and-slab generalized linear coupling between neurons. Additionally, we model two properties of the optogenetic perturbation: off-target photostimulation and photostimulation transients. Using this model, we were able to fit models on 30 minutes of data in just 10 minutes. We performed an all-optical circuit mapping experiment in primary visual cortex of the awake mouse, and use our approach to predict neural connectivity between excitatory neurons in layer 2/3. Predicted connectivity is sparse and consistent with known correlations with stimulus tuning, spontaneous correlation and distance
Model-based Bayesian inference of neural activity and connectivity from all-optical interrogation of a neural circuit
Population activity measurement by calcium imaging can be combined with cellular resolution optogenetic activity perturbations to enable the mapping of neural connectivity in vivo. This requires accurate inference of perturbed and unperturbed neural activity from calcium imaging measurements, which are noisy and indirect, and can also be contaminated by photostimulation artifacts. We have developed a new fully Bayesian approach to jointly inferring spiking activity and neural connectivity from in vivo all-optical perturbation experiments. In contrast to standard approaches that perform spike inference and analysis in two separate maximum-likelihood phases, our joint model is able to propagate uncertainty in spike inference to the inference of connectivity and vice versa. We use the framework of variational autoencoders to model spiking activity using discrete latent variables, low-dimensional latent common input, and sparse spike-and-slab generalized linear coupling between neurons. Additionally, we model two properties of the optogenetic perturbation: off-target photostimulation and photostimulation transients. Using this model, we were able to fit models on 30 minutes of data in just 10 minutes. We performed an all-optical circuit mapping experiment in primary visual cortex of the awake mouse, and use our approach to predict neural connectivity between excitatory neurons in layer 2/3. Predicted connectivity is sparse and consistent with known correlations with stimulus tuning, spontaneous correlation and distance
Model-based Bayesian inference of neural activity and connectivity from all-optical interrogation of a neural circuit
Population activity measurement by calcium imaging can be combined with cellular
resolution optogenetic activity perturbations to enable the mapping of neural
connectivity in vivo. This requires accurate inference of perturbed and unperturbed
neural activity from calcium imaging measurements, which are noisy and
indirect, and can also be contaminated by photostimulation artifacts. We have
developed a new fully Bayesian approach to jointly inferring spiking activity and
neural connectivity from in vivo all-optical perturbation experiments. In contrast
to standard approaches that perform spike inference and analysis in two separate
maximum-likelihood phases, our joint model is able to propagate uncertainty in
spike inference to the inference of connectivity and vice versa. We use the framework
of variational autoencoders to model spiking activity using discrete latent
variables, low-dimensional latent common input, and sparse spike-and-slab generalized
linear coupling between neurons. Additionally, we model two properties
of the optogenetic perturbation: off-target photostimulation and photostimulation
transients. Using this model, we were able to fit models on 30 minutes of data
in just 10 minutes. We performed an all-optical circuit mapping experiment in
primary visual cortex of the awake mouse, and use our approach to predict neural
connectivity between excitatory neurons in layer 2/3. Predicted connectivity is
sparse and consistent with known correlations with stimulus tuning, spontaneous
correlation and distance
Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine
Deep learning describes a class of machine learning algorithms that are capable of combining raw inputs into layers of intermediate features. These algorithms have recently shown impressive results across a variety of domains. Biology and medicine are data-rich disciplines, but the data are complex and often ill-understood. Hence, deep learning techniques may be particularly well suited to solve problems of these fields. We examine applications of deep learning to a variety of biomedical problems-patient classification, fundamental biological processes and treatment of patients-and discuss whether deep learning will be able to transform these tasks or if the biomedical sphere poses unique challenges. Following from an extensive literature review, we find that deep learning has yet to revolutionize biomedicine or definitively resolve any of the most pressing challenges in the field, but promising advances have been made on the prior state of the art. Even though improvements over previous baselines have been modest in general, the recent progress indicates that deep learning methods will provide valuable means for speeding up or aiding human investigation. Though progress has been made linking a specific neural network\u27s prediction to input features, understanding how users should interpret these models to make testable hypotheses about the system under study remains an open challenge. Furthermore, the limited amount of labelled data for training presents problems in some domains, as do legal and privacy constraints on work with sensitive health records. Nonetheless, we foresee deep learning enabling changes at both bench and bedside with the potential to transform several areas of biology and medicine