72,243 research outputs found
Enhancing workflow-nets with data for trace completion
The growing adoption of IT-systems for modeling and executing (business)
processes or services has thrust the scientific investigation towards
techniques and tools which support more complex forms of process analysis. Many
of them, such as conformance checking, process alignment, mining and
enhancement, rely on complete observation of past (tracked and logged)
executions. In many real cases, however, the lack of human or IT-support on all
the steps of process execution, as well as information hiding and abstraction
of model and data, result in incomplete log information of both data and
activities. This paper tackles the issue of automatically repairing traces with
missing information by notably considering not only activities but also data
manipulated by them. Our technique recasts such a problem in a reachability
problem and provides an encoding in an action language which allows to
virtually use any state-of-the-art planning to return solutions
Bug Hunting with False Negatives Revisited
Safe data abstractions are widely used for verification purposes. Positive verification results can be transferred from the abstract to the concrete system. When a property is violated in the abstract system, one still has to check whether a concrete violation scenario exists. However, even when the violation scenario is not reproducible in the concrete system (a false negative), it may still contain information on possible sources of bugs. Here, we propose a bug hunting framework based on abstract violation scenarios. We first extract a violation pattern from one abstract violation scenario. The violation pattern represents multiple abstract violation scenarios, increasing the chance that a corresponding concrete violation exists. Then, we look for a concrete violation that corresponds to the violation pattern by using constraint solving techniques. Finally, we define the class of counterexamples that we can handle and argue correctness of the proposed framework. Our method combines two formal techniques, model checking and constraint solving. Through an analysis of contracting and precise abstractions, we are able to integrate overapproximation by abstraction with concrete counterexample generation
A Compositional Approach for Schedulability Analysis of Distributed Avionics Systems
This work presents a compositional approach for schedulability analysis of
Distributed Integrated Modular Avionics (DIMA) systems that consist of
spatially distributed ARINC-653 modules connected by a unified AFDX network. We
model a DIMA system as a set of stopwatch automata in UPPAAL to verify its
schedulability by model checking. However, direct model checking is infeasible
due to the large state space. Therefore, we introduce the compositional
analysis that checks each partition including its communication environment
individually. Based on a notion of message interfaces, a number of message
sender automata are built to model the environment for a partition. We define a
timed selection simulation relation, which supports the construction of
composite message interfaces. By using assume-guarantee reasoning, we ensure
that each task meets the deadline and that communication constraints are also
fulfilled globally. The approach is applied to the analysis of a concrete DIMA
system.Comment: In Proceedings MeTRiD 2018, arXiv:1806.09330. arXiv admin note: text
overlap with arXiv:1803.1105
Verification of Agent-Based Artifact Systems
Artifact systems are a novel paradigm for specifying and implementing
business processes described in terms of interacting modules called artifacts.
Artifacts consist of data and lifecycles, accounting respectively for the
relational structure of the artifacts' states and their possible evolutions
over time. In this paper we put forward artifact-centric multi-agent systems, a
novel formalisation of artifact systems in the context of multi-agent systems
operating on them. Differently from the usual process-based models of services,
the semantics we give explicitly accounts for the data structures on which
artifact systems are defined. We study the model checking problem for
artifact-centric multi-agent systems against specifications written in a
quantified version of temporal-epistemic logic expressing the knowledge of the
agents in the exchange. We begin by noting that the problem is undecidable in
general. We then identify two noteworthy restrictions, one syntactical and one
semantical, that enable us to find bisimilar finite abstractions and therefore
reduce the model checking problem to the instance on finite models. Under these
assumptions we show that the model checking problem for these systems is
EXPSPACE-complete. We then introduce artifact-centric programs, compact and
declarative representations of the programs governing both the artifact system
and the agents. We show that, while these in principle generate infinite-state
systems, under natural conditions their verification problem can be solved on
finite abstractions that can be effectively computed from the programs. Finally
we exemplify the theoretical results of the paper through a mainstream
procurement scenario from the artifact systems literature
A Logical Verification Methodology for Service-Oriented Computing
We introduce a logical verification methodology for checking behavioural properties of service-oriented computing systems. Service properties are described by means of SocL, a branching-time temporal logic that we have specifically designed to express in an effective way distinctive aspects of services, such as, e.g., acceptance of a request, provision of a response, and correlation among service requests and responses. Our approach allows service properties to be expressed in such a way that
they can be independent of service domains and specifications. We show an instantiation of our general methodology that uses the formal language COWS to conveniently specify services and the expressly developed software tool CMC to assist the user in the task of verifying SocL formulae over service specifications. We demonstrate feasibility and effectiveness of our methodology by means of the specification and the analysis of a case study in the automotive domain
Abstraction and Learning for Infinite-State Compositional Verification
Despite many advances that enable the application of model checking
techniques to the verification of large systems, the state-explosion problem
remains the main challenge for scalability. Compositional verification
addresses this challenge by decomposing the verification of a large system into
the verification of its components. Recent techniques use learning-based
approaches to automate compositional verification based on the assume-guarantee
style reasoning. However, these techniques are only applicable to finite-state
systems. In this work, we propose a new framework that interleaves abstraction
and learning to perform automated compositional verification of infinite-state
systems. We also discuss the role of learning and abstraction in the related
context of interface generation for infinite-state components.Comment: In Proceedings Festschrift for Dave Schmidt, arXiv:1309.455
- ā¦