1,234 research outputs found
Parameterized Model Checking of Token-Passing Systems
We revisit the parameterized model checking problem for token-passing systems
and specifications in indexed .
Emerson and Namjoshi (1995, 2003) have shown that parameterized model checking
of indexed in uni-directional token
rings can be reduced to checking rings up to some \emph{cutoff} size. Clarke et
al. (2004) have shown a similar result for general topologies and indexed
, provided processes cannot choose the
directions for sending or receiving the token.
We unify and substantially extend these results by systematically exploring
fragments of indexed with respect to
general topologies. For each fragment we establish whether a cutoff exists, and
for some concrete topologies, such as rings, cliques and stars, we infer small
cutoffs. Finally, we show that the problem becomes undecidable, and thus no
cutoffs exist, if processes are allowed to choose the directions in which they
send or from which they receive the token.Comment: We had to remove an appendix until the proofs and notations there is
cleare
Parameterized Linear Temporal Logics Meet Costs: Still not Costlier than LTL
We continue the investigation of parameterized extensions of Linear Temporal
Logic (LTL) that retain the attractive algorithmic properties of LTL: a
polynomial space model checking algorithm and a doubly-exponential time
algorithm for solving games. Alur et al. and Kupferman et al. showed that this
is the case for Parametric LTL (PLTL) and PROMPT-LTL respectively, which have
temporal operators equipped with variables that bound their scope in time.
Later, this was also shown to be true for Parametric LDL (PLDL), which extends
PLTL to be able to express all omega-regular properties.
Here, we generalize PLTL to systems with costs, i.e., we do not bound the
scope of operators in time, but bound the scope in terms of the cost
accumulated during time. Again, we show that model checking and solving games
for specifications in PLTL with costs is not harder than the corresponding
problems for LTL. Finally, we discuss PLDL with costs and extensions to
multiple cost functions.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2015, arXiv:1509.0685
Parametric Linear Dynamic Logic
We introduce Parametric Linear Dynamic Logic (PLDL), which extends Linear
Dynamic Logic (LDL) by temporal operators equipped with parameters that bound
their scope. LDL was proposed as an extension of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL)
that is able to express all -regular specifications while still
maintaining many of LTL's desirable properties like an intuitive syntax and a
translation into non-deterministic B\"uchi automata of exponential size. But
LDL lacks capabilities to express timing constraints. By adding parameterized
operators to LDL, we obtain a logic that is able to express all
-regular properties and that subsumes parameterized extensions of LTL
like Parametric LTL and PROMPT-LTL. Our main technical contribution is a
translation of PLDL formulas into non-deterministic B\"uchi word automata of
exponential size via alternating automata. This yields a PSPACE model checking
algorithm and a realizability algorithm with doubly-exponential running time.
Furthermore, we give tight upper and lower bounds on optimal parameter values
for both problems. These results show that PLDL model checking and
realizability are not harder than LTL model checking and realizability.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2014, arXiv:1408.556
Counter Attack on Byzantine Generals: Parameterized Model Checking of Fault-tolerant Distributed Algorithms
We introduce an automated parameterized verification method for
fault-tolerant distributed algorithms (FTDA). FTDAs are parameterized by both
the number of processes and the assumed maximum number of Byzantine faulty
processes. At the center of our technique is a parametric interval abstraction
(PIA) where the interval boundaries are arithmetic expressions over parameters.
Using PIA for both data abstraction and a new form of counter abstraction, we
reduce the parameterized problem to finite-state model checking. We demonstrate
the practical feasibility of our method by verifying several variants of the
well-known distributed algorithm by Srikanth and Toueg. Our semi-decision
procedures are complemented and motivated by an undecidability proof for FTDA
verification which holds even in the absence of interprocess communication. To
the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to achieve parameterized
automated verification of Byzantine FTDA
Approximating Optimal Bounds in Prompt-LTL Realizability in Doubly-exponential Time
We consider the optimization variant of the realizability problem for Prompt
Linear Temporal Logic, an extension of Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) by the
prompt eventually operator whose scope is bounded by some parameter. In the
realizability optimization problem, one is interested in computing the minimal
such bound that allows to realize a given specification. It is known that this
problem is solvable in triply-exponential time, but not whether it can be done
in doubly-exponential time, i.e., whether it is just as hard as solving LTL
realizability.
We take a step towards resolving this problem by showing that the optimum can
be approximated within a factor of two in doubly-exponential time. Also, we
report on a proof-of-concept implementation of the algorithm based on bounded
LTL synthesis, which computes the smallest implementation of a given
specification. In our experiments, we observe a tradeoff between the size of
the implementation and the bound it realizes. We investigate this tradeoff in
the general case and prove upper bounds, which reduce the search space for the
algorithm, and matching lower bounds.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2016, arXiv:1609.0364
- …