12,707 research outputs found
Begin, After, and Later: a Maximal Decidable Interval Temporal Logic
Interval temporal logics (ITLs) are logics for reasoning about temporal
statements expressed over intervals, i.e., periods of time. The most famous ITL
studied so far is Halpern and Shoham's HS, which is the logic of the thirteen
Allen's interval relations. Unfortunately, HS and most of its fragments have an
undecidable satisfiability problem. This discouraged the research in this area
until recently, when a number non-trivial decidable ITLs have been discovered.
This paper is a contribution towards the complete classification of all
different fragments of HS. We consider different combinations of the interval
relations Begins, After, Later and their inverses Abar, Bbar, and Lbar. We know
from previous works that the combination ABBbarAbar is decidable only when
finite domains are considered (and undecidable elsewhere), and that ABBbar is
decidable over the natural numbers. We extend these results by showing that
decidability of ABBar can be further extended to capture the language
ABBbarLbar, which lays in between ABBar and ABBbarAbar, and that turns out to
be maximal w.r.t decidability over strongly discrete linear orders (e.g. finite
orders, the naturals, the integers). We also prove that the proposed decision
procedure is optimal with respect to the complexity class
Combining Spatial and Temporal Logics: Expressiveness vs. Complexity
In this paper, we construct and investigate a hierarchy of spatio-temporal
formalisms that result from various combinations of propositional spatial and
temporal logics such as the propositional temporal logic PTL, the spatial
logics RCC-8, BRCC-8, S4u and their fragments. The obtained results give a
clear picture of the trade-off between expressiveness and computational
realisability within the hierarchy. We demonstrate how different combining
principles as well as spatial and temporal primitives can produce NP-, PSPACE-,
EXPSPACE-, 2EXPSPACE-complete, and even undecidable spatio-temporal logics out
of components that are at most NP- or PSPACE-complete
Modal µ-Calculus, Model Checking and Gauß Elimination
In this paper we present a novel approach for solving Boolean equation systems with nested minimal and maximal fixpoints. The method works by successively eliminating variables and reducing a Boolean equation system similar to Gauß elimination for linear equation systems. It does not require backtracking techniques. Within one framework we suggest a global and a local algorithm. In the context of model checking in the modal-calculus the local algorithm is related to the tableau methods, but has a better worst case complexity
Modal Logics of Topological Relations
Logical formalisms for reasoning about relations between spatial regions play
a fundamental role in geographical information systems, spatial and constraint
databases, and spatial reasoning in AI. In analogy with Halpern and Shoham's
modal logic of time intervals based on the Allen relations, we introduce a
family of modal logics equipped with eight modal operators that are interpreted
by the Egenhofer-Franzosa (or RCC8) relations between regions in topological
spaces such as the real plane. We investigate the expressive power and
computational complexity of logics obtained in this way. It turns out that our
modal logics have the same expressive power as the two-variable fragment of
first-order logic, but are exponentially less succinct. The complexity ranges
from (undecidable and) recursively enumerable to highly undecidable, where the
recursively enumerable logics are obtained by considering substructures of
structures induced by topological spaces. As our undecidability results also
capture logics based on the real line, they improve upon undecidability results
for interval temporal logics by Halpern and Shoham. We also analyze modal
logics based on the five RCC5 relations, with similar results regarding the
expressive power, but weaker results regarding the complexity
- …