131 research outputs found
Iterative social consolidations:Forming beliefs from many-valued evidence and peers' opinions
Recently, several logics modelling evidence have been proposed in the literature. These logics often also feature beliefs. We call the process or function that maps evidence to beliefs consolidation. In this paper, we use a four-valued modal logic of evidence as a basis. In the models for this logic, agents are represented by nodes, peer connections by edges and the private evidence that each agent has by a four-valued valuation. From this basis, we propose methods of consolidating the beliefs of the agents, taking into account both their private evidence as well as their peers' opinions. To this end, beliefs are computed iteratively. The final consolidated beliefs are the ones in the point of stabilization of the model. However, it turns out that some consolidation policies will not stabilize for certain models. Finding the conditions for stabilization is one of the main problems studied here, along with other properties of such consolidations. Our main contributions are twofold: we offer a new dynamic perspective on the process of forming evidence-based beliefs, in the context of evidence logics, and we set up and address some mathematically challenging problems, which are related to graph theory and practical subject areas such as belief/opinion diffusion and contagion in multi-agent networks.</p
Reactive preferential structures and nonmonotonic consequence
We introduce information bearing systems (IBRS) as an abstraction of many
logical systems. We define a general semantics for IBRS, and show that IBRS
generalize in a natural way preferential semantics and solve open
representation problems
Current and Future Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning is a central, longstanding, and active
area of Artificial Intelligence. Over the years it has evolved significantly;
more recently it has been challenged and complemented by research in areas such
as machine learning and reasoning under uncertainty. In July 2022 a Dagstuhl
Perspectives workshop was held on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. The
goal of the workshop was to describe the state of the art in the field,
including its relation with other areas, its shortcomings and strengths,
together with recommendations for future progress. We developed this manifesto
based on the presentations, panels, working groups, and discussions that took
place at the Dagstuhl Workshop. It is a declaration of our views on Knowledge
Representation: its origins, goals, milestones, and current foci; its relation
to other disciplines, especially to Artificial Intelligence; and on its
challenges, along with key priorities for the next decade
Semantics for Higher Level Attacks in Extended Argumentation Frames Part 1: Overview
In 2005 the author introduced networks which allow attacks on attacks of any level. So if a→b reads a attacks b, then this attack can itself be attacked by another node c. This attack itself can attack another node d. This situation can be iterated to any level with attacks and nodes attacking other attacks and other nodes. In this paper we provide semantics (of extensions) to such networks. We offer three different approaches to obtaining semantics
Introducing Equational Semantics for Argumentation Networks
This paper provides equational semantics for Dung’s argumentation
networks. The network nodes get numerical values in [0,1], and are supposed
to satisfy certain equations. The solutions to these equations correspond to the
“extensions” of the network.
This approach is very general and includes the Caminada labelling as a special
case, as well as many other so-called network extensions, support systems, higher
level attacks, Boolean networks, dependence on time, etc, etc.
The equational approach has its conceptual roots in the 19th century following
the algebraic equational approach to logic by George Boole, Louis Couturat and
Ernst Schroeder
- …