115,779 research outputs found
Complexity of validity for propositional dependence logics
We study the validity problem for propositional dependence logic, modal
dependence logic and extended modal dependence logic. We show that the validity
problem for propositional dependence logic is NEXPTIME-complete. In addition,
we establish that the corresponding problem for modal dependence logic and
extended modal dependence logic is NEXPTIME-hard and in NEXPTIME^NP.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2014, arXiv:1408.556
The Expressive Power of Modal Dependence Logic
We study the expressive power of various modal logics with team semantics. We
show that exactly the properties of teams that are downward closed and closed
under team k-bisimulation, for some finite k, are definable in modal logic
extended with intuitionistic disjunction. Furthermore, we show that the
expressive power of modal logic with intuitionistic disjunction and extended
modal dependence logic coincide. Finally we establish that any translation from
extended modal dependence logic into modal logic with intuitionistic
disjunction increases the size of some formulas exponentially.Comment: 19 page
The expressive power of modal logic with inclusion atoms
Modal inclusion logic is the extension of basic modal logic with inclusion
atoms, and its semantics is defined on Kripke models with teams. A team of a
Kripke model is just a subset of its domain. In this paper we give a complete
characterisation for the expressive power of modal inclusion logic: a class of
Kripke models with teams is definable in modal inclusion logic if and only if
it is closed under k-bisimulation for some integer k, it is closed under
unions, and it has the empty team property. We also prove that the same
expressive power can be obtained by adding a single unary nonemptiness operator
to modal logic. Furthermore, we establish an exponential lower bound for the
size of the translation from modal inclusion logic to modal logic with the
nonemptiness operator.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2015, arXiv:1509.0685
Suhrawardi's Modal Syllogisms
Suhrawardi’s logic of the Hikmat al-Ishraq is basically modal. So to understand his modal logic one first has to know the non-modal part upon which his modal logic is built. In my previous paper ‘Suhrawardi on Syllogisms’(3) I discussed the former in detail. The present paper is an exposition of his treatment of modal syllogisms. On the basis of some reasonable existential presuppositions and a number of controversial metaphysical theses, and also by confining his theory to alethic modality, Suhrawardi makes his modal syllogism simple in a way that is without precedent
Non normal logics: semantic analysis and proof theory
We introduce proper display calculi for basic monotonic modal logic,the
conditional logic CK and a number of their axiomatic extensions. These calculi
are sound, complete, conservative and enjoy cut elimination and subformula
property. Our proposal applies the multi-type methodology in the design of
display calculi, starting from a semantic analysis based on the translation
from monotonic modal logic to normal bi-modal logic
An Observation Concerning Porte’s Rule in Modal Logic
It is well known that no consistent normal modal logic contains (as theorems) both ◊A and ◊¬A (for any formula A). Here we observe that this claim can be strengthened to the following: for any formula A, either no consistent normal modal logic contains ◊A, or else no consistent normal modal logic contains ◊¬A
Complete Additivity and Modal Incompleteness
In this paper, we tell a story about incompleteness in modal logic. The story
weaves together a paper of van Benthem, `Syntactic aspects of modal
incompleteness theorems,' and a longstanding open question: whether every
normal modal logic can be characterized by a class of completely additive modal
algebras, or as we call them, V-BAOs. Using a first-order reformulation of the
property of complete additivity, we prove that the modal logic that starred in
van Benthem's paper resolves the open question in the negative. In addition,
for the case of bimodal logic, we show that there is a naturally occurring
logic that is incomplete with respect to V-BAOs, namely the provability logic
GLB. We also show that even logics that are unsound with respect to such
algebras do not have to be more complex than the classical propositional
calculus. On the other hand, we observe that it is undecidable whether a
syntactically defined logic is V-complete. After these results, we generalize
the Blok Dichotomy to degrees of V-incompleteness. In the end, we return to van
Benthem's theme of syntactic aspects of modal incompleteness
- …