79,295 research outputs found

    A Note on the Edge Roman Domination in Trees

    Full text link
    A subset XX of edges of a graph GG is called an \textit{edgedominating set} of GG if every edge not in XX is adjacent tosome edge in XX. The edge domination number γ(G)\gamma'(G) of GG is the minimum cardinality taken over all edge dominating sets of GG. An \textit{edge Roman dominating function} of a graph GG is a function f:E(G){0,1,2}f : E(G)\rightarrow \{0,1,2 \} such that every edgeee with f(e)=0f(e)=0 is adjacent to some edge ee' with f(e)=2.f(e') = 2.The weight of an edge Roman dominating function ff is the valuew(f)=eE(G)f(e)w(f)=\sum_{e\in E(G)}f(e). The edge Roman domination number of GG, denoted by γR(G)\gamma_R'(G), is the minimum weight of an edge Roman dominating function of GG. In this paper, we characterize trees with edge Roman domination number twice the edge domination number

    Note on the upper bound of the rainbow index of a graph

    Full text link
    A path in an edge-colored graph GG, where adjacent edges may be colored the same, is a rainbow path if every two edges of it receive distinct colors. The rainbow connection number of a connected graph GG, denoted by rc(G)rc(G), is the minimum number of colors that are needed to color the edges of GG such that there exists a rainbow path connecting every two vertices of GG. Similarly, a tree in GG is a rainbow~tree if no two edges of it receive the same color. The minimum number of colors that are needed in an edge-coloring of GG such that there is a rainbow tree connecting SS for each kk-subset SS of V(G)V(G) is called the kk-rainbow index of GG, denoted by rxk(G)rx_k(G), where kk is an integer such that 2kn2\leq k\leq n. Chakraborty et al. got the following result: For every ϵ>0\epsilon> 0, a connected graph with minimum degree at least ϵn\epsilon n has bounded rainbow connection, where the bound depends only on ϵ\epsilon. Krivelevich and Yuster proved that if GG has nn vertices and the minimum degree δ(G)\delta(G) then rc(G)<20n/δ(G)rc(G)<20n/\delta(G). This bound was later improved to 3n/(δ(G)+1)+33n/(\delta(G)+1)+3 by Chandran et al. Since rc(G)=rx2(G)rc(G)=rx_2(G), a natural problem arises: for a general kk determining the true behavior of rxk(G)rx_k(G) as a function of the minimum degree δ(G)\delta(G). In this paper, we give upper bounds of rxk(G)rx_k(G) in terms of the minimum degree δ(G)\delta(G) in different ways, namely, via Szemer\'{e}di's Regularity Lemma, connected 22-step dominating sets, connected (k1)(k-1)-dominating sets and kk-dominating sets of GG.Comment: 12 pages. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:0902.1255 by other author

    Distributed algorithms for edge dominating sets

    Get PDF
    An edge dominating set for a graph G is a set D of edges such that each edge of G is in D or adjacent to at least one edge in D. This work studies deterministic distributed approximation algorithms for finding minimum-size edge dominating sets. The focus is on anonymous port-numbered networks: there are no unique identifiers, but a node of degree d can refer to its neighbours by integers 1, 2, ..., d. The present work shows that in the port-numbering model, edge dominating sets can be approximated as follows: in d-regular graphs, to within 4 − 6/(d + 1) for an odd d and to within 4 − 2/d for an even d; and in graphs with maximum degree Δ, to within 4 − 2/(Δ − 1) for an odd Δ and to within 4 − 2/Δ for an even Δ. These approximation ratios are tight for all values of d and Δ: there are matching lower bounds.Peer reviewe

    On Strong Split Middle Domination of a Graph

    Get PDF
    The middle graph M(G) of graph G is obtained by inserting a vertex xi in the “middle” of each edge ei, 1 ? i ? |E(G)|, and adding the edge xixj for 1?i ? j ? |E(G)| if and only if ei and ej have a common vertex. A dominating set D of graph G is said to be a strong split dominating set of G if ?V(G) – D? is totally disconnected with at least two vertices. Strong split domination number is the minimum cardinality taken over all strong split dominating sets of G. In this paper we initiate the study of strong split middle domination of a graph. The strong split middle domination number of a graph G, denoted as ?ssm (G) is the minimum cardinality of strong split dominating set of M(G). In this paper many bounds on ?ssm(G) are obtained in terms of other domination parameters and elements of graph G. Also some equalities for ?ssm(G) are established

    On Edge Dominating Number of Tensor Product of Cycle and Path

    Full text link
    A subset S' of E(G) is called an edge dominating set ofG if every edge not in S' is adjacent to some edge in S'. The edge dominatingnumber of G, denoted by γ'(G), of G is the minimum cardinality takenover all edge dominating sets of G. Let G1 (V1, E1) and G2(V2,E2) betwo connected graph. The tensor product of G1 and G2, denoted byG1⨂▒G2 is a graph with the cardinality of vertex |V| = |V1| × |V2|and two vertices (u1,u2) and (v1,v2) in V are adjacent in G1⨂▒G2ifu1 v1 ∈ E1 and u2,v2 ∈E2 . In this paper we study an edge dominatingnumber in the tensor product of path and cycle. The results show thatγ'(Cn⨂▒P2) = ⌈2n/3⌉ for n is odd, γ'(Cn⨂▒P3) = n for n is odd, and theedge dominating number is undefined if n is even. For n ∈even number,we investigated the edge dominating number of its component on tensorproduct of cycle Cn and path. The results are γ'c(Cn⨂▒P2)= ⌈n/3⌉ andγ'c(Cn ⨂▒P3) = ⌈n/2⌉ which Cn ,P2 and P3, respectively, is Cycle order n,Path order 2 and Path order 3
    corecore