Memory lower bounds for deterministic self-stabilization

In the context of self-stabilization, a \emph{silent} algorithm guarantees that the register of every node does not change once the algorithm has stabilized. At the end of the 90's, Dolev et al. [Acta Inf. '99] showed that, for finding the centers of a graph, for electing a leader, or for constructing a spanning tree, every silent algorithm must use a memory of $\Omega(\log n)$ bits per register in $n$-node networks. Similarly, Korman et al. [Dist. Comp. '07] proved, using the notion of proof-labeling-scheme, that, for constructing a minimum-weight spanning trees (MST), every silent algorithm must use a memory of $\Omega(\log^2n)$ bits per register. It follows that requiring the algorithm to be silent has a cost in terms of memory space, while, in the context of self-stabilization, where every node constantly checks the states of its neighbors, the silence property can be of limited practical interest. In fact, it is known that relaxing this requirement results in algorithms with smaller space-complexity. In this paper, we are aiming at measuring how much gain in terms of memory can be expected by using arbitrary self-stabilizing algorithms, not necessarily silent. To our knowledge, the only known lower bound on the memory requirement for general algorithms, also established at the end of the 90's, is due to Beauquier et al.~[PODC '99] who proved that registers of constant size are not sufficient for leader election algorithms. We improve this result by establishing a tight lower bound of $\Theta(\log \Delta+\log \log n)$ bits per register for self-stabilizing algorithms solving $(\Delta+1)$-coloring or constructing a spanning tree in networks of maximum degree~$\Delta$. The lower bound $\Omega(\log \log n)$ bits per register also holds for leader election

Space-Time Tradeoffs for Distributed Verification

Verifying that a network configuration satisfies a given boolean predicate is a fundamental problem in distributed computing. Many variations of this problem have been studied, for example, in the context of proof labeling schemes (PLS), locally checkable proofs (LCP), and non-deterministic local decision (NLD). In all of these contexts, verification time is assumed to be constant. Korman, Kutten and Masuzawa [PODC 2011] presented a proof-labeling scheme for MST, with poly-logarithmic verification time, and logarithmic memory at each vertex. In this paper we introduce the notion of a $t$-PLS, which allows the verification procedure to run for super-constant time. Our work analyzes the tradeoffs of $t$-PLS between time, label size, message length, and computation space. We construct a universal $t$-PLS and prove that it uses the same amount of total communication as a known one-round universal PLS, and $t$ factor smaller labels. In addition, we provide a general technique to prove lower bounds for space-time tradeoffs of $t$-PLS. We use this technique to show an optimal tradeoff for testing that a network is acyclic (cycle free). Our optimal $t$-PLS for acyclicity uses label size and computation space $O((\log n)/t)$. We further describe a recursive $O(\log^* n)$ space verifier for acyclicity which does not assume previous knowledge of the run-time $t$.Comment: Pre-proceedings version of paper presented at the 24th International Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication Complexity (SIROCCO 2017

Optimal Space Lower Bound for Deterministic Self-Stabilizing Leader Election Algorithms

Given a boolean predicate ? on labeled networks (e.g., proper coloring, leader election, etc.), a self-stabilizing algorithm for ? is a distributed algorithm that can start from any initial configuration of the network (i.e., every node has an arbitrary value assigned to each of its variables), and eventually converge to a configuration satisfying ?. It is known that leader election does not have a deterministic self-stabilizing algorithm using a constant-size register at each node, i.e., for some networks, some of their nodes must have registers whose sizes grow with the size n of the networks. On the other hand, it is also known that leader election can be solved by a deterministic self-stabilizing algorithm using registers of O(log log n) bits per node in any n-node bounded-degree network. We show that this latter space complexity is optimal. Specifically, we prove that every deterministic self-stabilizing algorithm solving leader election must use ?(log log n)-bit per node registers in some n-node networks. In addition, we show that our lower bounds go beyond leader election, and apply to all problems that cannot be solved by anonymous algorithms

Self-Stabilizing Distributed Cooperative Reset

Self-stabilization is a versatile fault-tolerance approach that characterizes the ability of a system to eventually resume a correct behavior after any finite number of transient faults. In this paper, we propose a self-stabilizing reset algorithm working in anonymous networks. This algorithm resets the network in a distributed non-centralized manner, i.e., it is multi-initiator, as each process detecting an inconsistency may initiate a reset. It is also cooperative in the sense that it coordinates concurrent reset executions in order to gain efficiency. Our approach is general since our reset algorithm allows to build self-stabilizing solutions for various problems and settings. As a matter of facts, we show that it applies to both static and dynamic specifications since we propose efficient self-stabilizing reset-based algorithms for the (1-minimal) (f, g)-alliance (a generalization of the dominating set problem) in identified networks and the unison problem in anonymous networks. Notice that these two latter instantiations enhance the state of the art. Indeed, in the former case, our solution is more general than the previous ones, while in the latter case, the complexity of our unison algorithm is better than that of previous solutions of the literature

Memory-Efficient and Self-Stabilizing Network RESET (Extended Abstract)

In this paper we consider the question of fault-tolerant distributed network protocols with extremely small memory requirements per processor. In particular, we show that even in the case of worst-case transient faults (i.e., in a self-stabilizing setting), many fundamental network protocols can be achieved using only O(log* n) bits of memory per incident network edge. In the heart of our construction is a self-stabilizing asynchronous network reset protocol with the same small memory requirements