64,007 research outputs found
Mean Estimation from Adaptive One-bit Measurements
We consider the problem of estimating the mean of a normal distribution under
the following constraint: the estimator can access only a single bit from each
sample from this distribution. We study the squared error risk in this
estimation as a function of the number of samples and one-bit measurements .
We consider an adaptive estimation setting where the single-bit sent at step
is a function of both the new sample and the previous acquired bits.
For this setting, we show that no estimator can attain asymptotic mean squared
error smaller than times the variance. In other words,
one-bit restriction increases the number of samples required for a prescribed
accuracy of estimation by a factor of at least compared to the
unrestricted case. In addition, we provide an explicit estimator that attains
this asymptotic error, showing that, rather surprisingly, only times
more samples are required in order to attain estimation performance equivalent
to the unrestricted case
Signal Recovery From 1-Bit Quantized Noisy Samples via Adaptive Thresholding
In this paper, we consider the problem of signal recovery from 1-bit noisy
measurements. We present an efficient method to obtain an estimation of the
signal of interest when the measurements are corrupted by white or colored
noise. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed framework is the pioneer
effort in the area of 1-bit sampling and signal recovery in providing a unified
framework to deal with the presence of noise with an arbitrary covariance
matrix including that of the colored noise. The proposed method is based on a
constrained quadratic program (CQP) formulation utilizing an adaptive
quantization thresholding approach, that further enables us to accurately
recover the signal of interest from its 1-bit noisy measurements. In addition,
due to the adaptive nature of the proposed method, it can recover both fixed
and time-varying parameters from their quantized 1-bit samples.Comment: This is a pre-print version of the original conference paper that has
been accepted at the 2018 IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and
Computer
Adaptive Quantizers for Estimation
In this paper, adaptive estimation based on noisy quantized observations is
studied. A low complexity adaptive algorithm using a quantizer with adjustable
input gain and offset is presented. Three possible scalar models for the
parameter to be estimated are considered: constant, Wiener process and Wiener
process with deterministic drift. After showing that the algorithm is
asymptotically unbiased for estimating a constant, it is shown, in the three
cases, that the asymptotic mean squared error depends on the Fisher information
for the quantized measurements. It is also shown that the loss of performance
due to quantization depends approximately on the ratio of the Fisher
information for quantized and continuous measurements. At the end of the paper
the theoretical results are validated through simulation under two different
classes of noise, generalized Gaussian noise and Student's-t noise
Does nonlinear metrology offer improved resolution? Answers from quantum information theory
A number of authors have suggested that nonlinear interactions can enhance
resolution of phase shifts beyond the usual Heisenberg scaling of 1/n, where n
is a measure of resources such as the number of subsystems of the probe state
or the mean photon number of the probe state. These suggestions are based on
calculations of `local precision' for particular nonlinear schemes. However, we
show that there is no simple connection between the local precision and the
average estimation error for these schemes, leading to a scaling puzzle. This
puzzle is partially resolved by a careful analysis of iterative implementations
of the suggested nonlinear schemes. However, it is shown that the suggested
nonlinear schemes are still limited to an exponential scaling in \sqrt{n}.
(This scaling may be compared to the exponential scaling in n which is
achievable if multiple passes are allowed, even for linear schemes.) The
question of whether nonlinear schemes may have a scaling advantage in the
presence of loss is left open.
Our results are based on a new bound for average estimation error that
depends on (i) an entropic measure of the degree to which the probe state can
encode a reference phase value, called the G-asymmetry, and (ii) any prior
information about the phase shift. This bound is asymptotically stronger than
bounds based on the variance of the phase shift generator. The G-asymmetry is
also shown to directly bound the average information gained per estimate. Our
results hold for any prior distribution of the shift parameter, and generalise
to estimates of any shift generated by an operator with discrete eigenvalues.Comment: 8 page
One-bit compressive sensing with norm estimation
Consider the recovery of an unknown signal from quantized linear
measurements. In the one-bit compressive sensing setting, one typically assumes
that is sparse, and that the measurements are of the form
. Since such
measurements give no information on the norm of , recovery methods from
such measurements typically assume that . We show that if one
allows more generally for quantized affine measurements of the form
, and if the vectors
are random, an appropriate choice of the affine shifts allows
norm recovery to be easily incorporated into existing methods for one-bit
compressive sensing. Additionally, we show that for arbitrary fixed in
the annulus , one may estimate the norm up to additive error from
such binary measurements through a single evaluation of the inverse Gaussian
error function. Finally, all of our recovery guarantees can be made universal
over sparse vectors, in the sense that with high probability, one set of
measurements and thresholds can successfully estimate all sparse vectors
within a Euclidean ball of known radius.Comment: 20 pages, 2 figure
Adaptive Measurements in the Optical Quantum Information Laboratory
Adaptive techniques make practical many quantum measurements that would
otherwise be beyond current laboratory capabilities. For example: they allow
discrimination of nonorthogonal states with a probability of error equal to the
Helstrom bound; they allow measurement of the phase of a quantum oscillator
with accuracy approaching (or in some cases attaining) the Heisenberg limit;
and they allow estimation of phase in interferometry with a variance scaling at
the Heisenberg limit, using only single qubit measurement and control. Each of
these examples has close links with quantum information, in particular
experimental optical quantum information: the first is a basic quantum
communication protocol; the second has potential application in linear optical
quantum computing; the third uses an adaptive protocol inspired by the quantum
phase estimation algorithm. We discuss each of these examples, and their
implementation in the laboratory, but concentrate upon the last, which was
published most recently [Higgins {\em et al.}, Nature vol. 450, p. 393, 2007].Comment: 12 pages, invited paper to be published in IEEE Journal of Selected
Topics in Quantum Electronics: Quantum Communications and Information Scienc
- …