Finding a Maximum Restricted tt-Matching via Boolean Edge-CSP

The problem of finding a maximum $2$-matching without short cycles has received significant attention due to its relevance to the Hamilton cycle problem. This problem is generalized to finding a maximum $t$-matching which excludes specified complete $t$-partite subgraphs, where $t$ is a fixed positive integer. The polynomial solvability of this generalized problem remains an open question. In this paper, we present polynomial-time algorithms for the following two cases of this problem: in the first case the forbidden complete $t$-partite subgraphs are edge-disjoint; and in the second case the maximum degree of the input graph is at most $2t-1$. Our result for the first case extends the previous work of Nam (1994) showing the polynomial solvability of the problem of finding a maximum $2$-matching without cycles of length four, where the cycles of length four are vertex-disjoint. The second result expands upon the works of B\'{e}rczi and V\'{e}gh (2010) and Kobayashi and Yin (2012), which focused on graphs with maximum degree at most $t+1$. Our algorithms are obtained from exploiting the discrete structure of restricted $t$-matchings and employing an algorithm for the Boolean edge-CSP.Comment: 20 pages, 2 figure

The traveling salesman problem on cubic and subcubic graphs

We study the traveling salesman problem (TSP) on the metric completion of cubic and subcubic graphs, which is known to be NP-hard. The problem is of interest because of its relation to the famous 4/3-conjecture for metric TSP, which says that the integrality gap, i.e., the worst case ratio between the optimal value of a TSP instance and that of its linear programming relaxation (the subtour elimination relaxation), is 4/3. We present the first algorithm for cubic graphs with approximation ratio 4/3. The proof uses polyhedral techniques in a surprising way, which is of independent interest. In fact we prove constructively that for any cubic graph on TeX vertices a tour of length TeX exists, which also implies the 4/3-conjecture, as an upper bound, for this class of graph-TSP. Recently, Mömke and Svensson presented an algorithm that gives a 1.461-approximation for graph-TSP on general graphs and as a side result a 4/3-approximation algorithm for this problem on subcubic graphs, also settling the 4/3-conjecture for this class of graph-TSP. The algorithm by Mömke and Svensson is initially randomized but the authors remark that derandomization is trivial. We will present a different way to derandomize their algorithm which leads to a faster running time. All of the latter also works for multigraphs

Online Algorithms for Maximum Cardinality Matching with Edge Arrivals

In the adversarial edge arrival model for maximum cardinality matching, edges of an unknown graph are revealed one-by-one in arbitrary order, and should be irrevocably accepted or rejected. Here, the goal of an online algorithm is to maximize the number of accepted edges while maintaining a feasible matching at any point in time. For this model, the standard greedy heuristic is 1/2-competitive, and on the other hand, no algorithm that outperforms this ratio is currently known, even for very simple graphs. We present a clean Min-Index framework for devising a family of randomized algorithms, and provide a number of positive and negative results in this context. Among these results, we present a 5/9-competitive algorithm when the underlying graph is a forest, and prove that this ratio is best possible within the Min-Index framework. In addition, we prove a new general upper bound of 2/(3+1/phi^2) ~ 0.5914 on the competitiveness of any algorithm in the edge arrival model. Interestingly, this bound holds even for an easier model in which vertices (along with their adjacent edges) arrive online, and when the underlying graph is a tree of maximum degree at most 3

On the Hardness of Partially Dynamic Graph Problems and Connections to Diameter

Conditional lower bounds for dynamic graph problems has received a great deal of attention in recent years. While many results are now known for the fully-dynamic case and such bounds often imply worst-case bounds for the partially dynamic setting, it seems much more difficult to prove amortized bounds for incremental and decremental algorithms. In this paper we consider partially dynamic versions of three classic problems in graph theory. Based on popular conjectures we show that: -- No algorithm with amortized update time $O(n^{1-\varepsilon})$ exists for incremental or decremental maximum cardinality bipartite matching. This significantly improves on the $O(m^{1/2-\varepsilon})$ bound for sparse graphs of Henzinger et al. [STOC'15] and $O(n^{1/3-\varepsilon})$ bound of Kopelowitz, Pettie and Porat. Our linear bound also appears more natural. In addition, the result we present separates the node-addition model from the edge insertion model, as an algorithm with total update time $O(m\sqrt{n})$ exists for the former by Bosek et al. [FOCS'14]. -- No algorithm with amortized update time $O(m^{1-\varepsilon})$ exists for incremental or decremental maximum flow in directed and weighted sparse graphs. No such lower bound was known for partially dynamic maximum flow previously. Furthermore no algorithm with amortized update time $O(n^{1-\varepsilon})$ exists for directed and unweighted graphs or undirected and weighted graphs. -- No algorithm with amortized update time $O(n^{1/2 - \varepsilon})$ exists for incremental or decremental $(4/3-\varepsilon')$-approximating the diameter of an unweighted graph. We also show a slightly stronger bound if node additions are allowed. [...]Comment: To appear at ICALP'16. Abstract truncated to fit arXiv limit