4,276 research outputs found

    A superlinear bound on the number of perfect matchings in cubic bridgeless graphs

    Get PDF
    Lovasz and Plummer conjectured in the 1970's that cubic bridgeless graphs have exponentially many perfect matchings. This conjecture has been verified for bipartite graphs by Voorhoeve in 1979, and for planar graphs by Chudnovsky and Seymour in 2008, but in general only linear bounds are known. In this paper, we provide the first superlinear bound in the general case.Comment: 54 pages v2: a short (missing) proof of Lemma 10 was adde

    Approximating Semi-Matchings in Streaming and in Two-Party Communication

    Full text link
    We study the communication complexity and streaming complexity of approximating unweighted semi-matchings. A semi-matching in a bipartite graph G = (A, B, E), with n = |A|, is a subset of edges S that matches all A vertices to B vertices with the goal usually being to do this as fairly as possible. While the term 'semi-matching' was coined in 2003 by Harvey et al. [WADS 2003], the problem had already previously been studied in the scheduling literature under different names. We present a deterministic one-pass streaming algorithm that for any 0 <= \epsilon <= 1 uses space O(n^{1+\epsilon}) and computes an O(n^{(1-\epsilon)/2})-approximation to the semi-matching problem. Furthermore, with O(log n) passes it is possible to compute an O(log n)-approximation with space O(n). In the one-way two-party communication setting, we show that for every \epsilon > 0, deterministic communication protocols for computing an O(n^{1/((1+\epsilon)c + 1)})-approximation require a message of size more than cn bits. We present two deterministic protocols communicating n and 2n edges that compute an O(sqrt(n)) and an O(n^{1/3})-approximation respectively. Finally, we improve on results of Harvey et al. [Journal of Algorithms 2006] and prove new links between semi-matchings and matchings. While it was known that an optimal semi-matching contains a maximum matching, we show that there is a hierarchical decomposition of an optimal semi-matching into maximum matchings. A similar result holds for semi-matchings that do not admit length-two degree-minimizing paths.Comment: This is the long version including all proves of the ICALP 2013 pape

    Edge-Stable Equimatchable Graphs

    Full text link
    A graph GG is \emph{equimatchable} if every maximal matching of GG has the same cardinality. We are interested in equimatchable graphs such that the removal of any edge from the graph preserves the equimatchability. We call an equimatchable graph GG \emph{edge-stable} if G∖eG\setminus {e}, that is the graph obtained by the removal of edge ee from GG, is also equimatchable for any e∈E(G)e \in E(G). After noticing that edge-stable equimatchable graphs are either 2-connected factor-critical or bipartite, we characterize edge-stable equimatchable graphs. This characterization yields an O(min⁡(n3.376,n1.5m))O(\min(n^{3.376}, n^{1.5}m)) time recognition algorithm. Lastly, we introduce and shortly discuss the related notions of edge-critical, vertex-stable and vertex-critical equimatchable graphs. In particular, we emphasize the links between our work and the well-studied notion of shedding vertices, and point out some open questions

    An ETH-Tight Exact Algorithm for Euclidean TSP

    Get PDF
    We study exact algorithms for {\sc Euclidean TSP} in Rd\mathbb{R}^d. In the early 1990s algorithms with nO(n)n^{O(\sqrt{n})} running time were presented for the planar case, and some years later an algorithm with nO(n1−1/d)n^{O(n^{1-1/d})} running time was presented for any d≄2d\geq 2. Despite significant interest in subexponential exact algorithms over the past decade, there has been no progress on {\sc Euclidean TSP}, except for a lower bound stating that the problem admits no 2O(n1−1/d−ϔ)2^{O(n^{1-1/d-\epsilon})} algorithm unless ETH fails. Up to constant factors in the exponent, we settle the complexity of {\sc Euclidean TSP} by giving a 2O(n1−1/d)2^{O(n^{1-1/d})} algorithm and by showing that a 2o(n1−1/d)2^{o(n^{1-1/d})} algorithm does not exist unless ETH fails.Comment: To appear in FOCS 201
    • 

    corecore