161,822 research outputs found
Classical logic, continuation semantics and abstract machines
One of the goals of this paper is to demonstrate that denotational semantics is useful for operational issues like implementation of functional languages by abstract machines. This is exemplified in a tutorial way by studying the case of extensional untyped call-by-name Ξ»-calculus with Felleisen's control operator 𝒞. We derive the transition rules for an abstract machine from a continuation semantics which appears as a generalization of the ¬¬-translation known from logic. The resulting abstract machine appears as an extension of Krivine's machine implementing head reduction. Though the result, namely Krivine's machine, is well known our method of deriving it from continuation semantics is new and applicable to other languages (as e.g. call-by-value variants). Further new results are that Scott's Dβ-models are all instances of continuation models. Moreover, we extend our continuation semantics to Parigot's λμ-calculus from which we derive an extension of Krivine's machine for λμ-calculus. The relation between continuation semantics and the abstract machines is made precise by proving computational adequacy results employing an elegant method introduced by Pitts
An abstract machine for concurrent Haskell with futures
We show how Sestoftβs abstract machine for lazy evaluation of purely functional programs can be extended to evaluate expressions of the calculus CHF β a process calculus that models Concurrent Haskell extended by imperative and implicit futures. The abstract machine is modularly constructed by first adding monadic IO-actions to the machine and then in a second step we add concurrency. Our main result is that the abstract machine coincides with the original operational semantics of CHF, w.r.t. may- and should-convergence
A Rational Deconstruction of Landin's SECD Machine with the J Operator
Landin's SECD machine was the first abstract machine for applicative
expressions, i.e., functional programs. Landin's J operator was the first
control operator for functional languages, and was specified by an extension of
the SECD machine. We present a family of evaluation functions corresponding to
this extension of the SECD machine, using a series of elementary
transformations (transformation into continu-ation-passing style (CPS) and
defunctionalization, chiefly) and their left inverses (transformation into
direct style and refunctionalization). To this end, we modernize the SECD
machine into a bisimilar one that operates in lockstep with the original one
but that (1) does not use a data stack and (2) uses the caller-save rather than
the callee-save convention for environments. We also identify that the dump
component of the SECD machine is managed in a callee-save way. The caller-save
counterpart of the modernized SECD machine precisely corresponds to Thielecke's
double-barrelled continuations and to Felleisen's encoding of J in terms of
call/cc. We then variously characterize the J operator in terms of CPS and in
terms of delimited-control operators in the CPS hierarchy. As a byproduct, we
also present several reduction semantics for applicative expressions with the J
operator, based on Curien's original calculus of explicit substitutions. These
reduction semantics mechanically correspond to the modernized versions of the
SECD machine and to the best of our knowledge, they provide the first syntactic
theories of applicative expressions with the J operator
Mechanized semantics
The goal of this lecture is to show how modern theorem provers---in this
case, the Coq proof assistant---can be used to mechanize the specification of
programming languages and their semantics, and to reason over individual
programs and over generic program transformations, as typically found in
compilers. The topics covered include: operational semantics (small-step,
big-step, definitional interpreters); a simple form of denotational semantics;
axiomatic semantics and Hoare logic; generation of verification conditions,
with application to program proof; compilation to virtual machine code and its
proof of correctness; an example of an optimizing program transformation (dead
code elimination) and its proof of correctness
Separation Logic for Small-step Cminor
Cminor is a mid-level imperative programming language; there are
proved-correct optimizing compilers from C to Cminor and from Cminor to machine
language. We have redesigned Cminor so that it is suitable for Hoare Logic
reasoning and we have designed a Separation Logic for Cminor. In this paper, we
give a small-step semantics (instead of the big-step of the proved-correct
compiler) that is motivated by the need to support future concurrent
extensions. We detail a machine-checked proof of soundness of our Separation
Logic. This is the first large-scale machine-checked proof of a Separation
Logic w.r.t. a small-step semantics. The work presented in this paper has been
carried out in the Coq proof assistant. It is a first step towards an
environment in which concurrent Cminor programs can be verified using
Separation Logic and also compiled by a proved-correct compiler with formal
end-to-end correctness guarantees.Comment: Version courte du rapport de recherche RR-613
- β¦