2,737 research outputs found
Low-rank semidefinite programming for the MAX2SAT problem
This paper proposes a new algorithm for solving MAX2SAT problems based on
combining search methods with semidefinite programming approaches. Semidefinite
programming techniques are well-known as a theoretical tool for approximating
maximum satisfiability problems, but their application has traditionally been
very limited by their speed and randomized nature. Our approach overcomes this
difficult by using a recent approach to low-rank semidefinite programming,
specialized to work in an incremental fashion suitable for use in an exact
search algorithm. The method can be used both within complete or incomplete
solver, and we demonstrate on a variety of problems from recent competitions.
Our experiments show that the approach is faster (sometimes by orders of
magnitude) than existing state-of-the-art complete and incomplete solvers,
representing a substantial advance in search methods specialized for MAX2SAT
problems.Comment: Accepted at AAAI'19. The code can be found at
https://github.com/locuslab/mixsa
A Logical Approach to Efficient Max-SAT solving
Weighted Max-SAT is the optimization version of SAT and many important
problems can be naturally encoded as such. Solving weighted Max-SAT is an
important problem from both a theoretical and a practical point of view. In
recent years, there has been considerable interest in finding efficient solving
techniques. Most of this work focus on the computation of good quality lower
bounds to be used within a branch and bound DPLL-like algorithm. Most often,
these lower bounds are described in a procedural way. Because of that, it is
difficult to realize the {\em logic} that is behind.
In this paper we introduce an original framework for Max-SAT that stresses
the parallelism with classical SAT. Then, we extend the two basic SAT solving
techniques: {\em search} and {\em inference}. We show that many algorithmic
{\em tricks} used in state-of-the-art Max-SAT solvers are easily expressable in
{\em logic} terms with our framework in a unified manner.
Besides, we introduce an original search algorithm that performs a restricted
amount of {\em weighted resolution} at each visited node. We empirically
compare our algorithm with a variety of solving alternatives on several
benchmarks. Our experiments, which constitute to the best of our knowledge the
most comprehensive Max-sat evaluation ever reported, show that our algorithm is
generally orders of magnitude faster than any competitor
On the van der Waerden numbers w(2;3,t)
We present results and conjectures on the van der Waerden numbers w(2;3,t)
and on the new palindromic van der Waerden numbers pdw(2;3,t). We have computed
the new number w(2;3,19) = 349, and we provide lower bounds for 20 <= t <= 39,
where for t <= 30 we conjecture these lower bounds to be exact. The lower
bounds for 24 <= t <= 30 refute the conjecture that w(2;3,t) <= t^2, and we
present an improved conjecture. We also investigate regularities in the good
partitions (certificates) to better understand the lower bounds.
Motivated by such reglarities, we introduce *palindromic van der Waerden
numbers* pdw(k; t_0,...,t_{k-1}), defined as ordinary van der Waerden numbers
w(k; t_0,...,t_{k-1}), however only allowing palindromic solutions (good
partitions), defined as reading the same from both ends. Different from the
situation for ordinary van der Waerden numbers, these "numbers" need actually
to be pairs of numbers. We compute pdw(2;3,t) for 3 <= t <= 27, and we provide
lower bounds, which we conjecture to be exact, for t <= 35.
All computations are based on SAT solving, and we discuss the various
relations between SAT solving and Ramsey theory. Especially we introduce a
novel (open-source) SAT solver, the tawSolver, which performs best on the SAT
instances studied here, and which is actually the original DLL-solver, but with
an efficient implementation and a modern heuristic typical for look-ahead
solvers (applying the theory developed in the SAT handbook article of the
second author).Comment: Second version 25 pages, updates of numerical data, improved
formulations, and extended discussions on SAT. Third version 42 pages, with
SAT solver data (especially for new SAT solver) and improved representation.
Fourth version 47 pages, with updates and added explanation
An Atypical Survey of Typical-Case Heuristic Algorithms
Heuristic approaches often do so well that they seem to pretty much always
give the right answer. How close can heuristic algorithms get to always giving
the right answer, without inducing seismic complexity-theoretic consequences?
This article first discusses how a series of results by Berman, Buhrman,
Hartmanis, Homer, Longpr\'{e}, Ogiwara, Sch\"{o}ening, and Watanabe, from the
early 1970s through the early 1990s, explicitly or implicitly limited how well
heuristic algorithms can do on NP-hard problems. In particular, many desirable
levels of heuristic success cannot be obtained unless severe, highly unlikely
complexity class collapses occur. Second, we survey work initiated by Goldreich
and Wigderson, who showed how under plausible assumptions deterministic
heuristics for randomized computation can achieve a very high frequency of
correctness. Finally, we consider formal ways in which theory can help explain
the effectiveness of heuristics that solve NP-hard problems in practice.Comment: This article is currently scheduled to appear in the December 2012
issue of SIGACT New
- …