Exploring ChatGPT's Potential for Consultation, Recommendations and Report Diagnosis: Gastric Cancer and Gastroscopy Reports’ Case

Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown its effectiveness in helping clinical users meet evolving challenges. Recently, ChatGPT, a newly launched AI chatbot with exceptional text comprehension capabilities, has triggered a global wave of AI popularization and application in seeking answers through human‒machine dialogues. Gastric cancer, as a globally prevalent disease, has a five-year survival rate of up to 90% when detected early and treated promptly. This research aims to explore ChatGPT's potential in disseminating gastric cancer knowledge, providing consultation recommendations, and interpreting endoscopy reports. Through experimentation, the GPT-4 model of ChatGPT achieved an appropriateness of 91.3% and a consistency of 95.7% in a gastric cancer knowledge test. Furthermore, GPT-4 has demonstrated considerable potential in consultation recommendations and endoscopy report analysis

Faculty Excellence

Each year, the University of New Hampshire selects a small number of its outstanding faculty for special recognition of their achievements in teaching, scholarship and service. Awards for Excellence in Teaching are given in each college and school, and university-wide awards recognize public service, research, teaching and engagement. This booklet details the year\u27s award winners\u27 accomplishments in short profiles with photographs and text

Mental Health and You

The Latinx community at the Epicenter in Salinas dealt with mental health illnesses, as well as were brought up with machismo attitudes. This population has a strong stigma against getting help with their mental health. Being faced with immigration, poverty, discrimination and inadequite conversations about health, drives a spike in anxiety levels. Consequences of not dealing with mental health illnesses include unresolved emotions are generational trauma, self harm, substance abuse, and unhealthy relationships. The project created to get in front of this problem was a dialogue series of conversation starters for people who want to open up. The purpose of this project was to have an in person communication dialogue about why it’s important to be so upfront about how one is feeling. From speaking to multiple Latinos a common theme was that they never got to express how traumas made them feel. It is recommended that this project be continued as a social experiment to have a more comfortable feeling of getting people to talk about their generational trauma, their worries, their feelings and their coping mechanisms

From Service Conversation Models to WS-CDL

Changing business environments are forcing organizations to develop flexible and adaptable enterprise systems. To accomplish this and to solve associated systems integration issues, many are moving towards web service technology. Two key ingredients of web services based solution are service composition and service choreography. While there has been lot of advancement in respect to service composition, service choreography rather largely remains an open problem. WS-CDL specification is considered to be a candidate standard for service choreography; however, consensus on support mechanisms to develop conversation models depicting peer-to-peer interactions are yet to be reached. In this paper, we develop an approach as well required heuristics for identifying service interaction patterns from business process models and using them to develop conversation models. We provide detailed discussion on heuristics, illustrate our approach through an example, as well as indicate how these conversation models can be used for generating WS-CDL specifications

New Student Directory, the Class of 1986

Directory of newly admitted students and new faculty members. The student directory includes photographs of the 372 students and student information including name, high school attended, city and state, activities, and/or area of academic interest. The 72 page directory is a simple paper bound booklet with black and white cartoon of an overwhelmed freshman and the title, \u27New Student Directory, The College of Wooster Class of 1986\u27 on the cover.https://openworks.wooster.edu/directories/1034/thumbnail.jp

Can ChatGPT Defend its Belief in Truth? Evaluating LLM Reasoning via Debate

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and GPT-4 have shown impressive performance in complex reasoning tasks. However, it is difficult to know whether the models are reasoning based on deep understandings of truth and logic, or leveraging their memorized patterns in a relatively superficial way. In this work, we explore testing LLMs' reasoning by engaging with them in a debate-like conversation, where given a question, the LLM and the user need to discuss to make the correct decision starting from opposing arguments. Upon mitigating the Clever Hans effect, our task requires the LLM to not only achieve the correct answer on its own, but also be able to hold and defend its belief instead of blindly believing or getting misled by the user's (invalid) arguments and critiques, thus testing in greater depth whether the LLM grasps the essence of the reasoning required to solve the problem. Across a range of complex reasoning benchmarks spanning math, commonsense, logic and BIG-Bench tasks, we find that despite their impressive performance as reported in existing work on generating correct step-by-step solutions in the beginning, LLMs like ChatGPT cannot maintain their beliefs in truth for a significant portion of examples when challenged by oftentimes absurdly invalid arguments. Our work points to danger zones of model alignment, and also suggests more careful treatments and interpretations of the recent findings that LLMs can improve their responses based on feedback.Comment: EMNLP-23 (findings

Academic Tenure and “White Male” Standards: Some Lessons from the Patent Law

At a conference not long ago, I met a professor from another law school who writes, as I sometimes do, about the efforts of the legal system to mediate the conflicts that arise between religion and society. Like me, she is a critic of the way the law currently deals with these conflicts, fearing, as I do, that the legal culture tends to trivialize and denigrate religious devotion. So one might have thought we would have a lot in common. So did I, and I anticipated a fruitful discussion of our shared scholarly interest—until the conversation took a disturbing turn. My new acquaintance told me that she was familiar with two of my articles touching on religion and society. But only one of them, she told me, was clearly written by someone who is black. Had she known that I was black, she said, she would have gotten so much more out of the other one. Puzzled, I asked why this should be so. She seemed surprised at the question. It would, she said, have placed the argument in its proper perspective. This answer, however, only increased my bewilderment. Why, I asked, could she not simply take the argument as it was, evaluating it without regard to the color of my skin? Because, she explained patiently, she needed a context in which to evaluate the argument. Only then, she added gently, might we have a real conversation

2022 BLSA Spring Alumni Weekend: Banquet Keynote and Chat with Danisha Hall \u2711 J.D.

On March 26, 2022, Black Law Students Association alumni, current students, faculty, and friends gathered for a banquet during the 2022 BLSA Spring Alumni Weekend. This video shows the keynote address from Danisha Hall ‘11 J.D., director of US Leadership and Business Communications at McDonald’s, followed by a chat with Hall and BLSA Vice President-Elect Jazmyn Ferguson, a 1L student. Location: Duncan Student Center Ballroom, University of Notre Dam

Reflections on Creating a Student-Run Journal: A Duo-ethnography

Literature regarding graduate student training suggests that graduate students struggle to become involved in academic publishing. Once involved in the publication process, however, graduate students are able to transform their learning, as well as develop knowledge and skills for their future careers. To help further foster student involvement in the publication process at the Werklund School of Education (WSE), the University of Calgary, seven graduate students from educational research and psychology decided to launch a student-run, peer-reviewed research journal called Emerging Perspectives: Interdisciplinary Graduate Research in Education and Psychology (EPIGREP). Using Norris and Sawyer’s (2012) duo-ethnographic approach, this article focused on  the editorial team members’ shared reflections and experiences as they answered questions regarding the identified gaps that EPIGREP would fill in terms of graduate student training, the challenges and barriers faced during the inaugural year, and the ways in which participation in the journal could empower journal users to engage in the publication process. Finally we noted implications and future directions regarding establishing EPIGREP as a graduate student initiative to foster research participation