460 research outputs found
Learning to Rank Academic Experts in the DBLP Dataset
Expert finding is an information retrieval task that is concerned with the
search for the most knowledgeable people with respect to a specific topic, and
the search is based on documents that describe people's activities. The task
involves taking a user query as input and returning a list of people who are
sorted by their level of expertise with respect to the user query. Despite
recent interest in the area, the current state-of-the-art techniques lack in
principled approaches for optimally combining different sources of evidence.
This article proposes two frameworks for combining multiple estimators of
expertise. These estimators are derived from textual contents, from
graph-structure of the citation patterns for the community of experts, and from
profile information about the experts. More specifically, this article explores
the use of supervised learning to rank methods, as well as rank aggregation
approaches, for combing all of the estimators of expertise. Several supervised
learning algorithms, which are representative of the pointwise, pairwise and
listwise approaches, were tested, and various state-of-the-art data fusion
techniques were also explored for the rank aggregation framework. Experiments
that were performed on a dataset of academic publications from the Computer
Science domain attest the adequacy of the proposed approaches.Comment: Expert Systems, 2013. arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:1302.041
Finding Academic Experts on a MultiSensor Approach using Shannon's Entropy
Expert finding is an information retrieval task concerned with the search for
the most knowledgeable people, in some topic, with basis on documents
describing peoples activities. The task involves taking a user query as input
and returning a list of people sorted by their level of expertise regarding the
user query. This paper introduces a novel approach for combining multiple
estimators of expertise based on a multisensor data fusion framework together
with the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and Shannon's entropy. More
specifically, we defined three sensors which detect heterogeneous information
derived from the textual contents, from the graph structure of the citation
patterns for the community of experts, and from profile information about the
academic experts. Given the evidences collected, each sensor may define
different candidates as experts and consequently do not agree in a final
ranking decision. To deal with these conflicts, we applied the Dempster-Shafer
theory of evidence combined with Shannon's Entropy formula to fuse this
information and come up with a more accurate and reliable final ranking list.
Experiments made over two datasets of academic publications from the Computer
Science domain attest for the adequacy of the proposed approach over the
traditional state of the art approaches. We also made experiments against
representative supervised state of the art algorithms. Results revealed that
the proposed method achieved a similar performance when compared to these
supervised techniques, confirming the capabilities of the proposed framework
Learning Reputation in an Authorship Network
The problem of searching for experts in a given academic field is hugely
important in both industry and academia. We study exactly this issue with
respect to a database of authors and their publications. The idea is to use
Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to perform
topic modelling in order to find authors who have worked in a query field. We
then construct a coauthorship graph and motivate the use of influence
maximisation and a variety of graph centrality measures to obtain a ranked list
of experts. The ranked lists are further improved using a Markov Chain-based
rank aggregation approach. The complete method is readily scalable to large
datasets. To demonstrate the efficacy of the approach we report on an extensive
set of computational simulations using the Arnetminer dataset. An improvement
in mean average precision is demonstrated over the baseline case of simply
using the order of authors found by the topic models
Unsupervised Extraction of Representative Concepts from Scientific Literature
This paper studies the automated categorization and extraction of scientific
concepts from titles of scientific articles, in order to gain a deeper
understanding of their key contributions and facilitate the construction of a
generic academic knowledgebase. Towards this goal, we propose an unsupervised,
domain-independent, and scalable two-phase algorithm to type and extract key
concept mentions into aspects of interest (e.g., Techniques, Applications,
etc.). In the first phase of our algorithm we propose PhraseType, a
probabilistic generative model which exploits textual features and limited POS
tags to broadly segment text snippets into aspect-typed phrases. We extend this
model to simultaneously learn aspect-specific features and identify academic
domains in multi-domain corpora, since the two tasks mutually enhance each
other. In the second phase, we propose an approach based on adaptor grammars to
extract fine grained concept mentions from the aspect-typed phrases without the
need for any external resources or human effort, in a purely data-driven
manner. We apply our technique to study literature from diverse scientific
domains and show significant gains over state-of-the-art concept extraction
techniques. We also present a qualitative analysis of the results obtained.Comment: Published as a conference paper at CIKM 201
Development of Computer Science Disciplines - A Social Network Analysis Approach
In contrast to many other scientific disciplines, computer science considers
conference publications. Conferences have the advantage of providing fast
publication of papers and of bringing researchers together to present and
discuss the paper with peers. Previous work on knowledge mapping focused on the
map of all sciences or a particular domain based on ISI published JCR (Journal
Citation Report). Although this data covers most of important journals, it
lacks computer science conference and workshop proceedings. That results in an
imprecise and incomplete analysis of the computer science knowledge. This paper
presents an analysis on the computer science knowledge network constructed from
all types of publications, aiming at providing a complete view of computer
science research. Based on the combination of two important digital libraries
(DBLP and CiteSeerX), we study the knowledge network created at
journal/conference level using citation linkage, to identify the development of
sub-disciplines. We investigate the collaborative and citation behavior of
journals/conferences by analyzing the properties of their co-authorship and
citation subgraphs. The paper draws several important conclusions. First,
conferences constitute social structures that shape the computer science
knowledge. Second, computer science is becoming more interdisciplinary. Third,
experts are the key success factor for sustainability of journals/conferences
Risk-Averse Matchings over Uncertain Graph Databases
A large number of applications such as querying sensor networks, and
analyzing protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, rely on mining uncertain
graph and hypergraph databases. In this work we study the following problem:
given an uncertain, weighted (hyper)graph, how can we efficiently find a
(hyper)matching with high expected reward, and low risk?
This problem naturally arises in the context of several important
applications, such as online dating, kidney exchanges, and team formation. We
introduce a novel formulation for finding matchings with maximum expected
reward and bounded risk under a general model of uncertain weighted
(hyper)graphs that we introduce in this work. Our model generalizes
probabilistic models used in prior work, and captures both continuous and
discrete probability distributions, thus allowing to handle privacy related
applications that inject appropriately distributed noise to (hyper)edge
weights. Given that our optimization problem is NP-hard, we turn our attention
to designing efficient approximation algorithms. For the case of uncertain
weighted graphs, we provide a -approximation algorithm, and a
-approximation algorithm with near optimal run time. For the case
of uncertain weighted hypergraphs, we provide a
-approximation algorithm, where is the rank of the
hypergraph (i.e., any hyperedge includes at most nodes), that runs in
almost (modulo log factors) linear time.
We complement our theoretical results by testing our approximation algorithms
on a wide variety of synthetic experiments, where we observe in a controlled
setting interesting findings on the trade-off between reward, and risk. We also
provide an application of our formulation for providing recommendations of
teams that are likely to collaborate, and have high impact.Comment: 25 page
- …