49,727 research outputs found
Evolutionary Robotics: a new scientific tool for studying cognition
We survey developments in Artificial Neural Networks, in Behaviour-based Robotics and Evolutionary Algorithms that set the stage for Evolutionary Robotics in the 1990s. We examine the motivations for using ER as a scientific tool for studying minimal models of cognition, with the advantage of being capable of generating integrated sensorimotor systems with minimal (or controllable) prejudices. These systems must act as a whole in close coupling with their environments which is an essential aspect of real cognition that is often either bypassed or modelled poorly in other disciplines. We demonstrate with three example studies: homeostasis under visual inversion; the origins of learning; and the ontogenetic acquisition of entrainment
Dynamical principles in neuroscience
Dynamical modeling of neural systems and brain functions has a history of success over the last half century. This includes, for example, the explanation and prediction of some features of neural rhythmic behaviors. Many interesting dynamical models of learning and memory based on physiological experiments have been suggested over the last two decades. Dynamical models even of consciousness now exist. Usually these models and results are based on traditional approaches and paradigms of nonlinear dynamics including dynamical chaos. Neural systems are, however, an unusual subject for nonlinear dynamics for several reasons: (i) Even the simplest neural network, with only a few neurons and synaptic connections, has an enormous number of variables and control parameters. These make neural systems adaptive and flexible, and are critical to their biological function. (ii) In contrast to traditional physical systems described by well-known basic principles, first principles governing the dynamics of neural systems are unknown. (iii) Many different neural systems exhibit similar dynamics despite having different architectures and different levels of complexity. (iv) The network architecture and connection strengths are usually not known in detail and therefore the dynamical analysis must, in some sense, be probabilistic. (v) Since nervous systems are able to organize behavior based on sensory inputs, the dynamical modeling of these systems has to explain the transformation of temporal information into combinatorial or combinatorial-temporal codes, and vice versa, for memory and recognition. In this review these problems are discussed in the context of addressing the stimulating questions: What can neuroscience learn from nonlinear dynamics, and what can nonlinear dynamics learn from neuroscience?This work was supported by NSF Grant No. NSF/EIA-0130708, and Grant No. PHY 0414174; NIH Grant No. 1 R01 NS50945 and Grant No. NS40110; MEC BFI2003-07276, and FundaciĂłn BBVA
Fractional Dynamical Systems
In this paper the author presents the results of the preliminary
investigation of fractional dynamical systems based on the results of numerical
simulations of fractional maps. Fractional maps are equivalent to fractional
differential equations describing systems experiencing periodic kicks. Their
properties depend on the value of two parameters: the non-linearity parameter,
which arises from the corresponding regular dynamical systems; and the memory
parameter which is the order of the fractional derivative in the corresponding
non-linear fractional differential equations. The examples of the fractional
Standard and Logistic maps demonstrate that phase space of non-linear
fractional dynamical systems may contain periodic sinks, attracting slow
diverging trajectories, attracting accelerator mode trajectories, chaotic
attractors, and cascade of bifurcations type trajectories whose properties are
different from properties of attractors in regular dynamical systems. The
author argues that discovered properties should be evident in the natural
(biological, psychological, physical, etc.) and engineering systems with
power-law memory.Comment: 6 pages, 4 figure
- …