20,226 research outputs found
Learning Opposites with Evolving Rules
The idea of opposition-based learning was introduced 10 years ago. Since then
a noteworthy group of researchers has used some notions of oppositeness to
improve existing optimization and learning algorithms. Among others,
evolutionary algorithms, reinforcement agents, and neural networks have been
reportedly extended into their opposition-based version to become faster and/or
more accurate. However, most works still use a simple notion of opposites,
namely linear (or type- I) opposition, that for each assigns its
opposite as . This, of course, is a very naive estimate of
the actual or true (non-linear) opposite , which has been
called type-II opposite in literature. In absence of any knowledge about a
function that we need to approximate, there seems to be no
alternative to the naivety of type-I opposition if one intents to utilize
oppositional concepts. But the question is if we can receive some level of
accuracy increase and time savings by using the naive opposite estimate
according to all reports in literature, what would we be able to
gain, in terms of even higher accuracies and more reduction in computational
complexity, if we would generate and employ true opposites? This work
introduces an approach to approximate type-II opposites using evolving fuzzy
rules when we first perform opposition mining. We show with multiple examples
that learning true opposites is possible when we mine the opposites from the
training data to subsequently approximate .Comment: Accepted for publication in The 2015 IEEE International Conference on
Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE 2015), August 2-5, 2015, Istanbul, Turke
Learning Opposites Using Neural Networks
Many research works have successfully extended algorithms such as
evolutionary algorithms, reinforcement agents and neural networks using
"opposition-based learning" (OBL). Two types of the "opposites" have been
defined in the literature, namely \textit{type-I} and \textit{type-II}. The
former are linear in nature and applicable to the variable space, hence easy to
calculate. On the other hand, type-II opposites capture the "oppositeness" in
the output space. In fact, type-I opposites are considered a special case of
type-II opposites where inputs and outputs have a linear relationship. However,
in many real-world problems, inputs and outputs do in fact exhibit a nonlinear
relationship. Therefore, type-II opposites are expected to be better in
capturing the sense of "opposition" in terms of the input-output relation. In
the absence of any knowledge about the problem at hand, there seems to be no
intuitive way to calculate the type-II opposites. In this paper, we introduce
an approach to learn type-II opposites from the given inputs and their outputs
using the artificial neural networks (ANNs). We first perform \emph{opposition
mining} on the sample data, and then use the mined data to learn the
relationship between input and its opposite . We have validated
our algorithm using various benchmark functions to compare it against an
evolving fuzzy inference approach that has been recently introduced. The
results show the better performance of a neural approach to learn the
opposites. This will create new possibilities for integrating oppositional
schemes within existing algorithms promising a potential increase in
convergence speed and/or accuracy.Comment: To appear in proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on
Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2016), Cancun, Mexico, December 201
Recommended from our members
Hyper-legalisation and delegalisation in the AFSJ: on contradictions in the external management of EU migration
The EU governance of migration has distinct internal and external facets, which may be viewed as innately contradictory. On the one hand, for example, there is legal competence for enhanced measures to combat illegal immigration but on the other hand, it is to manage efficiently migration flows, yet with fairness towards third country nationals. These contradictions define the EU’s Area of Freedom Security and Justice more generally, as a complex and evolving site of tremendous injustice and crisis. In times of crisis, there is an increasing number of soft law tools in EU external migration, used to enable flexibility, deploying management lexicon, principles and tools as a means to avoid or minimalize the need for ‘hard’ binding law (e.g. frameworks, compacts, action plans), in a process of ‘hyper-legalisation’ of external migration. Often, it results from the multiplicity of constitutional competences applying in external migration. It mirrors well other crisis-ridden subjects of EU law, in particular as to the financial crisis. On the other hand, there is also a trend in significant recent caselaw towards the ‘de-legalisation’ of migration policy, putting key legal and policy questions in forms beyond review and outside of the treaties, as in the financial crisis as well as other leading cases. They explicitly detail the nature of the contradictions at the heart of the external dimension to the AFSJ in the area of migration and the problematic nature of EU law-making. They also provide reason for concern about basic conceptualisations of the rule of law therein. The key decisions arbitrarily decide the scope of ‘non-legislative’, ‘non-application’ and ‘European’ as to EU law. They emphasise the contradictions at the heart of the AFSJ, increasingly excluded through judicial review
COMPLEXITY * SIMPLICITY * SIMPLEXITY
“In the midst of order, there is chaos; but in the midst of chaos, there is order”, John Gribbin wrote in his book Deep Simplicity (p.76). In this dialectical spirit, we discuss the generative tension between complexity and simplicity in the theory and practice of management and organization. Complexity theory suggests that the relationship between complex environments and complex organizations advanced by the well-known Ashby’s law, may be reconsidered: only simple organization provides enough space for individual agency to match environmental turbulence in the form of complex organizational responses. We suggest that complex organizing may be paradoxically facilitated by a simple infrastructure, and that the theory of organizations may be viewed as resulting from the interplay between simplicity and complexity. JEL codes:
Recommended from our members
Changes in the Organization of Paternal Behavior during Early and Middle Childhood
Philosophical foundations of the Death and Anti-Death discussion
Perhaps there has been no greater opportunity than in this “VOLUME FIFTEEN of our Death And Anti-Death set of anthologies” to write about how might think about life and how to avoid death. There are two reasons to discuss “life”, the first being enhancing our understanding of who we are and why we may be here in the Universe. The second is more practical: how humans meet the physical challenges brought about by the way they have interacted with their environment.
Many persons discussing “life” beg the question about what “life” is. Surely, when one discusses how to overcome its opposite, death, they are not referring to another “living” thing such as a plant. There seems to be a commonality, though, and it is this commonality is one needing elaboration. It ostensibly seems to be the boundary condition separating what is completely passive (inert) from what attempts to maintain its integrity, as well as fulfilling other conditions we think “life” has. In our present discussion, there will be a reminder that it by no means has been unequivocally established what life really is by placing quotes around the word, namely, “life”. Consider it a tag representing a bundle of philosophical ideas that will be unpacked in this paper
Some resonances between Eastern thought and Integral Biomathics in the framework of the WLIMES formalism for modelling living systems
Forty-two years ago, Capra published “The Tao of Physics” (Capra, 1975). In this book (page 17) he writes: “The exploration of the atomic and subatomic world in the twentieth century has …. necessitated a radical revision of many of our basic concepts” and that, unlike ‘classical’ physics, the sub-atomic and quantum “modern physics” shows resonances with Eastern thoughts and “leads us to a view of the world which is very similar to the views held by mystics of all ages and traditions.“ This article stresses an analogous situation in biology with respect to a new theoretical approach for studying living systems, Integral Biomathics (IB), which also exhibits some resonances with Eastern thought. Stepping on earlier research in cybernetics1 and theoretical biology,2 IB has been developed since 2011 by over 100 scientists from a number of disciplines who have been exploring a substantial set of theoretical frameworks. From that effort, the need for a robust core model utilizing advanced mathematics and computation adequate for understanding the behavior of organisms as dynamic wholes was identified. At this end, the authors of this article have proposed WLIMES (Ehresmann and Simeonov, 2012), a formal theory for modeling living systems integrating both the Memory Evolutive Systems (Ehresmann and Vanbremeersch, 2007) and the Wandering Logic Intelligence (Simeonov, 2002b). Its principles will be recalled here with respect to their
resonances to Eastern thought
- …