Unexpected rules using a conceptual distance based on fuzzy ontology

AbstractOne of the major drawbacks of data mining methods is that they generate a notably large number of rules that are often obvious or useless or, occasionally, out of the user’s interest. To address such drawbacks, we propose in this paper an approach that detects a set of unexpected rules in a discovered association rule set. Generally speaking, the proposed approach investigates the discovered association rules using the user’s domain knowledge, which is represented by a fuzzy domain ontology. Next, we rank the discovered rules according to the conceptual distances of the rules

Unexpectedness as a Measure of Interestingness in Knowledge Discovery

Organizations are taking advantage of "data-mining" techniques to leverage the vast amounts of data captured as they process routine transactions. Data-mining is the process of discovering hidden structure or patterns in data. However several of the pattern discovery methods in datamining systems have the drawbacks that they discover too many obvious or irrelevant patterns and that they do not leverage to a full extent valuable prior domain knowledge that managers have. This research addresses these drawbacks by developing ways to generate interesting patterns by incorporating managers' prior knowledge in the process of searching for patterns in data. Specifically we focus on providing methods that generate unexpected patterns with respect to managerial intuition by eliciting managers' beliefs about the domain and using these beliefs to seed the search for unexpected patterns in data. Our approach should lead to the development of decision support systems that provide managers with more relevant patterns from data and aid in effective decision making.Information Systems Working Papers Serie

Measuring Interestingness – Perspectives on Anomaly Detection

We live in a data deluge. Our ability to gather, distribute, and store information has grown immensely over the past two decades. With this overabundance of data, the core knowledge discovery problem is no longer in the gathering of this data, but rather in the retrieving of relevant data efficiently. While the most common approach is to use rule interestingness to filter results of the association rule generation process, study of literature suggests that interestingness is difficult to define quantitatively and is best summarized as, “a record or pattern is interesting if it suggests a change in an established model.” In this paper we elaborate on the term interestingness, and the surrounding taxonomy of interestingness measures, anomalies, novelty and surprisingness. We review and summarize the current state of literature surrounding interestingness and associated approaches. Keywords: Interestingness, anomaly detection, rare-class mining, Interestingness measures, outliers, surprisingness, novelt

Modeling interestingness of streaming association rules as a benefit-maximizing classification problem

Cataloged from PDF version of article.In a typical application of association rule learning from market basket data, a set of transactions for a fixed period of time is used as input to rule learning algorithms. For example, the well-known Apriori algorithm can be applied to learn a set of association rules from such a transaction set. However, learning association rules from a set of transactions is not a one time only process. For example, a market manager may perform the association rule learning process once every month over the set of transactions collected through the last month. For this reason, we will consider the problem where transaction sets are input to the system as a stream of packages. The sets of transactions may come in varying sizes and in varying periods. Once a set of transactions arrive, the association rule learning algorithm is executed on the last set of transactions, resulting in new association rules. Therefore, the set of association rules learned will accumulate and increase in number over time, making the mining of interesting ones out of this enlarging set of association rules impractical for human experts. We refer to this sequence of rules as "association rule set stream" or "streaming association rules" and the main motivation behind this research is to develop a technique to overcome the interesting rule selection problem. A successful association rule mining system should select and present only the interesting rules to the domain experts. However, definition of interestingness of association rules on a given domain usually differs from one expert to another and also over time for a given expert. This paper proposes a post-processing method to learn a subjective model for the interestingness concept description of the streaming association rules. The uniqueness of the proposed method is its ability to formulate the interestingness issue of association rules as a benefit-maximizing classification problem and obtain a different interestingness model for each user. In this new classification scheme, the determining features are the selective objective interestingness factors related to the interestingness of the association rules, and the target feature is the interestingness label of those rules. The proposed method works incrementally and employs user interactivity at a certain level. It is evaluated on a real market dataset. The results show that the model can successfully select the interesting ones. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

On Objective Measures of Rule Surprisingness

Most of the literature argues that surprisingness is an inherently subjective aspect of the discovered knowledge, which cannot be measured in objective terms. This paper departs from this view, and it has a twofold goal: (1) showing that it is indeed possible to define objective (rather than subjective) measures of discovered rule surprisingness; (2) proposing new ideas and methods for defining objective rule surprisingness measures

Mining unexpected patterns using decision trees and interestingness measures: a case study of endometriosis

[[abstract]]Because clinical research is carried out in complex environments, prior domain knowledge, constraints, and expert knowledge can enhance the capabilities and performance of data mining. In this paper we propose an unexpected pattern mining model that uses decision trees to compare recovery rates of two different treatments, and to find patterns that contrast with the prior knowledge of domain users. In the proposed model we define interestingness measures to determine whether the patterns found are interesting to the domain. By applying the concept of domain-driven data mining, we repeatedly utilize decision trees and interestingness measures in a closed-loop, in-depth mining process to find unexpected and interesting patterns. We use retrospective data from transvaginal ultrasound-guided aspirations to show that the proposed model can successfully compare different treatments using a decision tree, which is a new usage of that tool. We believe that unexpected, interesting patterns may provide clinical researchers with different perspectives for future research.[[incitationindex]]SCI[[incitationindex]]EI[[booktype]]紙本[[booktype]]電子