Kinematic and Dynamic Analysis of the 2-DOF Spherical Wrist of Orthoglide 5-axis

This paper deals with the kinematics and dynamics of a two degree of freedom spherical manipulator, the wrist of Orthoglide 5-axis. The latter is a parallel kinematics machine composed of two manipulators: i) the Orthoglide 3-axis; a three-dof translational parallel manipulator that belongs to the family of Delta robots, and ii) the Agile eye; a two-dof parallel spherical wrist. The geometric and inertial parameters used in the model are determined by means of a CAD software. The performance of the spherical wrist is emphasized by means of several test trajectories. The effects of machining and/or cutting forces and the length of the cutting tool on the dynamic performance of the wrist are also analyzed. Finally, a preliminary selection of the motors is proposed from the velocities and torques required by the actuators to carry out the test trajectories

Kinematic Analysis and Trajectory Planning of the Orthoglide 5-axis

The subject of this paper is about the kinematic analysis and the trajectory planning of the Orthoglide 5-axis. The Orthoglide 5-axis a five degrees of freedom parallel kinematic machine developed at IRCCyN and is made up of a hybrid architecture, namely, a three degrees of freedom translational parallel manip-ulator mounted in series with a two degrees of freedom parallel spherical wrist. The simpler the kinematic modeling of the Or-thoglide 5-axis, the higher the maximum frequency of its control loop. Indeed, the control loop of a parallel kinematic machine should be computed with a high frequency, i.e., higher than 1.5 MHz, in order the manipulator to be able to reach high speed motions with a good accuracy. Accordingly, the direct and inverse kinematic models of the Orthoglide 5-axis, its inverse kine-matic Jacobian matrix and the first derivative of the latter with respect to time are expressed in this paper. It appears that the kinematic model of the manipulator under study can be written in a quadratic form due to the hybrid architecture of the Orthoglide 5-axis. As illustrative examples, the profiles of the actuated joint angles (lengths), velocities and accelerations that are used in the control loop of the robot are traced for two test trajectories.Comment: Appears in International Design Engineering Technical Conferences \& Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Aug 2015, Boston, United States. 201

Mechatronic development and dynamic control of a 3-DOF parallel manipulator

This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines: An International Journal, 40:4, 434-452 [September 2012] [copyright Taylor & Francis], available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/15397734.2012.687292The aim of this article is to develop, from the mechatronic point of view, a low-cost parallel manipulator (PM) with 3-degrees of freedom (DOF). The robot has to be able to generate and control one translational motion (heave) and two rotary motions (rolling and pitching). Applications for this kind of parallel manipulator can be found at least in driving-motion simulation and in the biomechanical field. An open control architecture has been developed for this manipulator, which allows implementing and testing different dynamic control schemes for a PM with 3-DOF. Thus, the robot developed can be used as a test bench where control schemes can be tested. In this article, several control schemes are proposed and the tracking control responses are compared. The schemes considered are based on passivity-based control and inverse dynamic control. The control algorithm considers point-to-point control or tracking control. When the controller considers the system dynamics, an identified model has been used. The control schemes have been tested on a virtual robot and on the actual prototype. © 2012 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Plan Nacional de I+D, Comision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia (FEDER-CICYT) for the partial financing of this study under the projects DPI2009-13830-C02-01 and DPI2010-20814-C02-(01, 02). This work was also supported in part by the CDCHT-ULA Grant I-1286-11-02-B.Vallés Miquel, M.; Díaz-Rodríguez, M.; Valera Fernández, Á.; Mata Amela, V.; Page Del Pozo, AF. (2012). Mechatronic development and dynamic control of a 3-DOF parallel manipulator. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines: An International Journal. 40(4):434-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2012.687292S434452404Awtar, S., Bernard, C., Boklund, N., Master, A., Ueda, D., & Craig, K. (2002). Mechatronic design of a ball-on-plate balancing system. Mechatronics, 12(2), 217-228. doi:10.1016/s0957-4158(01)00062-9Carretero, J. A., Podhorodeski, R. P., Nahon, M. A., & Gosselin, C. M. (1999). Kinematic Analysis and Optimization of a New Three Degree-of-Freedom Spatial Parallel Manipulator. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(1), 17-24. doi:10.1115/1.533542Castelli, G., Ottaviano, E., & Ceccarelli, M. (2008). A Fairly General Algorithm to Evaluate Workspace Characteristics of Serial and Parallel Manipulators#. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 36(1), 14-33. doi:10.1080/15397730701729478Chablat, D., & Wenger, P. (2003). Architecture optimization of a 3-DOF translational parallel mechanism for machining applications, the orthoglide. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 19(3), 403-410. doi:10.1109/tra.2003.810242Clavel , R. ( 1988 ). DELTA, a fast robot with parallel geometry.Proceedings of 18th International Symposium on Industrial Robot.Switzerland: Lausanne, April, pp. 91–100 .Díaz-Rodríguez, M., Mata, V., Farhat, N., & Provenzano, S. (2008). Identifiability of the Dynamic Parameters of a Class of Parallel Robots in the Presence of Measurement Noise and Modeling Discrepancy#. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 36(4), 478-498. doi:10.1080/15397730802446501Díaz-Rodríguez, M., Mata, V., Valera, Á., & Page, Á. (2010). A methodology for dynamic parameters identification of 3-DOF parallel robots in terms of relevant parameters. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 45(9), 1337-1356. doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2010.04.007García de Jalón, J., & Bayo, E. (1994). Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems. Mechanical Engineering Series. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2600-0Gough , V. E. , Whitehall , S. G. ( 1962 ). Universal tire test machine.Proceedings of 9th International Technical Congress FISITA, London, pp. 117–137 .Sung Kim, H., & Tsai, L.-W. (2003). Kinematic Synthesis of a Spatial 3-RPS Parallel Manipulator. Journal of Mechanical Design, 125(1), 92-97. doi:10.1115/1.1539505Lee, K.-M., & Shah, D. K. (1988). Kinematic analysis of a three-degrees-of-freedom in-parallel actuated manipulator. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation, 4(3), 354-360. doi:10.1109/56.796Li, Y., & Xu, Q. (2007). Design and Development of a Medical Parallel Robot for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 12(3), 265-273. doi:10.1109/tmech.2007.897257Merlet, J.-P. (2000). Parallel Robots. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-9587-7Merlet , J. P. ( 2002 ). Optimal design for the micro parallel robot MIPS.Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, pp. 1149–1154 .Ortega, R., & Spong, M. W. (1989). Adaptive motion control of rigid robots: A tutorial. Automatica, 25(6), 877-888. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(89)90054-xPaccot, F., Andreff, N., & Martinet, P. (2009). A Review on the Dynamic Control of Parallel Kinematic Machines: Theory and Experiments. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 28(3), 395-416. doi:10.1177/0278364908096236Rosillo, N., Valera, A., Benimeli, F., Mata, V., & Valero, F. (2011). Real‐time solving of dynamic problem in industrial robots. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 38(2), 119-129. doi:10.1108/01439911111106336Stewart , D. A. ( 1965 ). A platform with 6 degree of freedom.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers.Part 1 15:371–386 .Syrseloudis , C. E. , Emiris , I. Z. ( 2008 ). A parallel robot for ankle rehabilitation-evaluation and its design specifications.Proceeding of 8th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering, Athens, October 1–6

Development of kinematic equations and determination of workspace of a 6 DOF end-effector with closed-kinematic chain mechanism

This report presents results from the research grant entitled Active Control of Robot Manipulators, funded by the Goddard Space Flight Center, under Grant NAG5-780, for the period July 1, 1988 to January 1, 1989. An analysis is presented of a 6 degree-of-freedom robot end-effector built to study telerobotic assembly of NASA hardware in space. Since the end-effector is required to perform high precision motion in a limited workspace, closed-kinematic mechanisms are chosen for its design. A closed-form solution is obtained for the inverse kinematic problem and an iterative procedure employing Newton-Raphson method is proposed to solve the forward kinematic problem. A study of the end-effector workspace results in a general procedure for the workspace determination based on link constraints. Computer simulation results are presented

A Framework to Illustrate Kinematic Behavior of Mechanisms by Haptic Feedback

The kinematic properties of mechanisms are well known by the researchers and teachers. The theory based on the study of Jacobian matrices allows us to explain, for example, the singular configuration. However, in many cases, the physical sense of such properties is difficult to explain to students. The aim of this article is to use haptic feedback to render to the user the signification of different kinematic indices. The framework uses a Phantom Omni and a serial and parallel mechanism with two degrees of freedom. The end-effector of both mechanisms can be moved either by classical mouse, or Phantom Omni with or without feedback

Optimal dimensional synthesis of force feedback lower arm exoskeletons

This paper presents multi-criteria design optimization of parallel mechanism based force feedback exoskeletons for human forearm and wrist. The optimized devices are aimed to be employed as a high fidelity haptic interfaces. Multiple design objectives are discussed and classified for the devices and the optimization problem to study the trade-offs between these criteria is formulated. Dimensional syntheses are performed for optimal global kinematic and dynamic performance, utilizing a Pareto front based framework, for two spherical parallel mechanisms that satisfy the ergonomic necessities of a human forearm and wrist. Two optimized mechanisms are compared and discussed in the light of multiple design criteria. Finally, kinematic structure and dimensions of an optimal exoskeleton are decided