eHealth Programme of the International Council of Nurses

This paper describes the ICN eHealth Programme in terms of its vision and goals. ICN advocates for nurses and nursing worldwide and recognizes that all nurses can benefit from knowledge about and use of information and communication technology in their practice setting. The three primary elements of the eHealth Programme (Connecting Nurses, Telenursing, and ICNP) will continue development and collaboration both within ICN and with the worldwide health care community

Transnational comparison : A retrospective study on e-health in sparsely populated areas of the northern periphery

Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Nursing informatics competencies for entry to practice: the perspective of six countries

Internationally, countries are challenged to prepare nurses for a future that has ever increasing use of technology and where information management is a central part of professional nursing practice. There has been a growing trend to move nursing to competency-based education, especially for those students undertaking their first nursing qualification. This first nursing qualification may be linked to pre-registration, pre-licensure or undergraduate education; the term used depending on the country. The authors are drawn from the International Medical Informatics Association special interest group, Nursing Informatics (IMIA-NI) Education Working Group and represent New Zealand, the United States of America, England, Australia, Finland and Canada

A website supporting sensitive religious and cultural advance care planning (ACPTalk): Formative and summative evaluation

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) promotes conversations about future health care needs, enacted if a person is incapable of making decisions at end-of-life that may be communicated through written documentation such as advance care directives. To meet the needs of multicultural and multifaith populations in Australia, an advance care planning website, ACPTalk, was funded to support health professionals in conducting conversations within diverse religious and cultural populations. ACPTalk aimed to provide religion-specific advance care planning content and complement existing resources. Objective: The purpose of this paper was to utilize the context, input, process, and product (CIPP) framework to conduct a formative and summative evaluation of ACPTalk. Methods: The CIPP framework was used, which revolves around 4 aspects of evaluation: context, input, process, and product. Context: health professionals’ solutions for the website were determined through thematic analysis of exploratory key stakeholder interviews. Included religions were determined through an environmental scan, Australian population statistics, and documentary analysis of project steering committee meeting minutes. Input: Project implementation and challenges were examined through documentary analysis of project protocols and meeting minutes. Process: To ensure religion-specific content was accurate and appropriate, a website prototype was built with content review and functionality testing by representatives from religious and cultural organizations and other interested health care organizations who completed a Web-based survey. Product: Website analytics were used to report utilization, and stakeholder perceptions were captured through interviews and a website survey. Results: Context: A total of 16 key stakeholder health professional (7 general practitioners, 2 primary health nurses, and 7 palliative care nurses) interviews were analyzed. Website solutions included religious and cultural information, communication ideas, legal information, downloadable content, and Web-based accessibility. Christian and non-Christian faiths were to be included in the religion-specific content. Input: Difficulties gaining consensus on religion-specific content were overcome by further state and national religious organizations providing feedback. Process: A total of 37 content reviewers included representatives of religious and cultural organizations (n=29), health care (n=5), and community organizations (n=3). The majority strongly agree or agree that the content used appropriate language and tone (92%, 34/37), would support health professionals (89%, 33/37), and was accurate (83%, 24/29). Product: Resource usage within the first 9 months was 12,957 page views in 4260 sessions; majority were (83.45%, 3555/4260) from Australia. A total of 107 Australian-based users completed the website survey; most felt information was accurate (77.6%, 83/107), easy to understand (82.2%, 88/107), useful (86.0%, 92/107), and appropriate (86.0%, 92/107). A total of 20 nurses (general practice n=10, palliative care n=8, and both disciplines n=2) participated in stakeholder interviews. Qualitative findings indicated overall positivity in relation to accessibility, functionality, usefulness, design, and increased knowledge of advance care planning. Recommended improvements included shortened content, a comparable website for patients and families, and multilingual translations. Conclusions: The CIPP framework was effectively applied to evaluate the development and end product of an advance care planning website. Although overall findings were positive, further advance care planning website development should consider the recommendations derived from this study

Briefing to the incoming Minister of Health 2014

Executive summary This briefing provides you, as the incoming Minister, with information on challenges and opportunities facing the New Zealand health and disability system, and how the Ministry can advise and support you to implement your Government’s priorities for health. The Ministry looks forward to discussing with you how to progress your health policies, including: providing high-quality health services; healthy communities; a strong and engaged health workforce; quality aged care and mental health services. The New Zealand health and disability sector provides world-class services, is driven by a trusted, passionate and skilled workforce, across a spectrum of public, NGOs and private providers, and serves a population that can generally access the care it needs, when it needs it. There are, however, many pressures and environmental changes that require both immediate management and longer-term strategic change. As Minister, you have a number of levers at your disposal to guide system change through setting policy direction, legislation and regulations, funding models and performance management, as well as influencing culture and leadership. Every New Zealander will, at some point in their lives, rely on our health and disability system. It is a large and complex system with multiple decision-makers and mixed public and private ownership models. It operates in a dynamic, continually changing environment characterised by well-known global and local challenges, including:   changing population health needs and burden of disease (especially the rising impact of long- term conditions and risk factors, such as diabetes and obesity)   the growing impact of health-care associated infections, antimicrobial resistance and emerging infectious diseases, eg, Ebola   rapid advances in technology, developments in personalised medicine and changing public expectations   an ageing population, and a workforce that is ageing along with the population   a constrained funding environment for the foreseeable future   a growing fiscal sustainability challenge as health consumes an increasing proportion of total government expenditure. These challenges are placing pressure and new demands on the way public health and disability services are currently delivered. Significant gains in the overall health of New Zealanders could be achieved by concentrating on people who have poorer health outcomes, complex health needs or who need a stronger voice. These might include vulnerable children, older people, people with long-term conditions, people with mental health and addiction problems and people with disabilities. Health and disability services need to build on current progress and adapt to future needs. The health system’s ability to provide a sustainable, quality public health service depends on keeping ahead of the challenges. This briefing provides some suggestions for where we could work with you to meet these challenges. There are opportunities to make better use of existing resources, people, facilities and funding, through new ways of delivering services that keep people well with better prevention and early Briefing to the Incoming Minister of Health v intervention. Significant gains could be made by developing a longer-term focus on preventing disability and illness in the first place. There are new opportunities for the health workforce to work in different ways with a broader range of colleagues across the health and wider social sectors, and with partners in the community. To better equip the New Zealand health and disability system for the future, we suggest focusing on four areas. 1  Better integrate services within health and across the social sector: Strengthening integration within health and across government to support the most vulnerable, reduce inequities and address issues outside the health and disability system that impact on health. 2  Improve the way services are purchased and provided: Ensuring funding models support change, building and supporting the key enablers and drivers of change: workforce, health information and capital. 3  Lift quality and performance: Driving performance through measuring and rewarding the right things to improve quality. 4  Support leadership and capability for change: Supporting strong governance, clinical and executive leadership and capability across the health sector.&nbsp

Development and formative evaluation of the e-Health implementation toolkit

<b>Background</b> The use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) or e-Health is seen as essential for a modern, cost-effective health service. However, there are well documented problems with implementation of e-Health initiatives, despite the existence of a great deal of research into how best to implement e-Health (an example of the gap between research and practice). This paper reports on the development and formative evaluation of an e-Health Implementation Toolkit (e-HIT) which aims to summarise and synthesise new and existing research on implementation of e-Health initiatives, and present it to senior managers in a user-friendly format.<p></p> <b>Results</b> The content of the e-HIT was derived by combining data from a systematic review of reviews of barriers and facilitators to implementation of e-Health initiatives with qualitative data derived from interviews of "implementers", that is people who had been charged with implementing an e-Health initiative. These data were summarised, synthesised and combined with the constructs from the Normalisation Process Model. The software for the toolkit was developed by a commercial company (RocketScience). Formative evaluation was undertaken by obtaining user feedback. There are three components to the toolkit - a section on background and instructions for use aimed at novice users; the toolkit itself; and the report generated by completing the toolkit. It is available to download from http://www.ucl.ac.uk/pcph/research/ehealth/documents/e-HIT.xls<p></p> <b>Conclusions</b> The e-HIT shows potential as a tool for enhancing future e-Health implementations. Further work is needed to make it fully web-enabled, and to determine its predictive potential for future implementations

DCU ICNP® user group summary report 2016

An annual summary report and evaluation of research activity completed with working groups in the SNHS ICNP Center in 2016

Telehealth Nursing Research: Adding to the Evidence-base for Healthcare

This paper reviews recent, nurse-led telehealth research with the goal of describing research findings that provide evidence for practice. Methods: Using an iterative search method, of eight electronic databases, 84 nurse-led research papers were separated into intervention research, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and descriptive research. The main emphasis was on full text analysis of the intervention research. Results: Fifteen intervention research papers reported findings related to cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, older age, young adults, early adolescents, children with special health care needs, people with a stoma, post-partum mothers and nurses. Also reviewed for useable evidence for practice were 10 systematic reviews, two meta-analyses and two papers that described reviews plus meta-analyses. Resuts: Fifty-five papers with descriptive designs are briefly described. Nurse-led intervention research is increasing knowledge about the use of telehealth technology and applications in care delivery. People with healthcare needs do better with individual attention and increased follow-up. People have a tolerance for technology used with them to advance their quality of life and healing but there is a point at which too much technology is overwhelming. Clinical research is a challenge due to the number of extraneous variables that are difficult to control and that can affect a person’s response to the research intervention. Conclusion: Continuation of nurse-led telehealth intervention research will help to ensure that technology used to support and advance care delivery will be evidence-based