Geometric constraint subsets and subgraphs in the analysis of assemblies and mechanisms

Geometric Reasoning ability is central to many applications in CAD/CAM/CAPP environments -- An increasing demand exists for Geometric Reasoning systems which evaluate the feasibility of virtual scenes specified by geometric relations -- Thus, the Geometric Constraint Satisfaction or Scene Feasibility (GCS/SF) problem consists of a basic scenario containing geometric entities, whose context is used to propose constraining relations among still undefined entities -- If the constraint specification is consistent, the answer of the problem is one of finitely or infinitely many solution scenarios satisfying the prescribed constraints -- Otherwise, a diagnostic of inconsistency is expected -- The three main approaches used for this problem are numerical, procedural or operational and mathematical -- Numerical and procedural approaches answer only part of the problem, and are not complete in the sense that a failure to provide an answer does not preclude the existence of one -- The mathematical approach previously presented by the authors describes the problem using a set of polynomial equations -- The common roots to this set of polynomials characterizes the solution space for such a problem -- That work presents the use of Groebner basis techniques for verifying the consistency of the constraints -- It also integrates subgroups of the Special Euclidean Group of Displacements SE(3) in the problem formulation to exploit the structure implied by geometric relations -- Although theoretically sound, these techniques require large amounts of computing resources -- This work proposes Divide-and-Conquer techniques applied to local GCS/SF subproblems to identify strongly constrained clusters of geometric entities -- The identification and preprocessing of these clusters generally reduces the effort required in solving the overall problem -- Cluster identification can be related to identifying short cycles in the Spatial Con straint graph for the GCS/SF problem -- Their preprocessing uses the aforementioned Algebraic Geometry and Group theoretical techniques on the local GCS/SF problems that correspond to these cycles -- Besides improving theefficiency of the solution approach, the Divide-and-Conquer techniques capture the physical essence of the problem -- This is illustrated by applying the discussed techniques to the analysis of the degrees of freedom of mechanism

Geometric constraint subsets and subgraphs in the analysis of assemblies and mechanisms

Geometric Reasoning ability is central to many applications in CAD/CAM/CAPP environments. An increasing demand exists for Geometric Reasoning systems which evaluate the feasibility of virtual scenes specified by geometric relations. Thus, the Geometric Constraint Satisfaction or Scene Feasibility (GCS/SF) problem consists of a basic scenario containing geometric entities, whose context is used to propose constraining relations among still undefined entities. If the constraint specification is consistent, the answer of the problem is one of finitely or infinitely many solution scenarios satisfying the prescribed constraints. Otherwise, a diagnostic of inconsistency is expected. The three main approaches used for this problem are numerical, procedural or operational and mathematical. Numerical and procedural approaches answer only part of the problem, and are not complete in the sense that a failure to provide an answer does not preclude the existence of one. The mathematical approach previously presented by the authors describes the problem using a set of polynomial equations. The common roots to this set of polynomials characterizes the solution space for such a problem. That work presents the use of Groebner basis techniques for verifying the consistency of the constraints. It also integrates subgroups of the Special Euclidean Group of Displacements SE(3) in the problem formulation to exploit the structure implied by geometric relations. Although theoretically sound, these techniques require large amounts of computing resources. This work proposes Divide-and-Conquer techniques applied to local GCS/SF subproblems to identify strongly constrained clusters of geometric entities. The identification and preprocessing of these clusters generally reduces the effort required in solving the overall problem. Cluster identification can be related to identifying short cycles in the Spatial Constraint graph for the GCS/SF problem. Their preprocessing uses the aforementioned Algebraic Geometry and Group theoretical techniques on the local GCS/SF problems that correspond to these cycles. Besides improving the efficiency of the solution approach, the Divide-and-Conquer techniques capture the physical essence of the problem. This is illustrated by applying the discussed techniques to the analysis of the degrees of freedom of mechanisms.MSC: 68U07La habilidad del Razonamiento Geométrico es central a muchas aplicaciones de CAD/CAM/CAPP (Computer Aided Design, Manufacturing and Process Planning). Existe una demanda creciente de sistemas de Razonamiento Geométrico que evalúen la factibilidad de escenas virtuales, especificados por relaciones geométricas. Por lo tanto, el problema de Satisfacción de Restricciones Geométricas o de Factibilidad de Escena (GCS/SF) consta de un escenario básico conteniendo entidades geométricas, cuyo contexto es usado para proponer relaciones de restricción entre entidades aún indefinidas. Si la especificación de las restricciones es consistente, la respuesta al problema es uno del finito o infinito número de escenarios solución que satisfacen las restricciones propuestas. De otra forma, un diagnóstico de inconsistencia es esperado. Las tres principales estrategias usadas para este problema son: numérica, procedimental y matemática. Las soluciones numérica y procedimental resuelven solo parte del problema, y no son completas en el sentido de que una ausencia de respuesta no significa la ausencia de ella. La aproximación matemática previamente presentada por los autores describe el problema usando una serie de ecuaciones polinómicas. Las raíces comunes a este conjunto de polinomios caracterizan el espacio solución para el problema. Ese trabajo presenta el uso de técnicas con Bases de Groebner para verificar la consistencia de las restricciones. Ella también integra los subgrupos del grupo especial Euclídeo de desplazamientos SE(3) en la formulación del problema para explotar la estructura implicada por las relaciones geométricas. Aunque teóricamente sólidas, estas técnicas requieren grandes cantidades de recursos computacionales. Este trabajo propone técnicas de Dividir y Conquistar aplicadas a subproblemas GCS/SF locales para identificar conjuntos de entidades geométricas fuertemente restringidas entre sí. La identificación y pre-procesamiento de dichos conjuntos locales, generalmente reduce el esfuerzo requerido para resolver el problema completo. La identificación de dichos sub-problemas locales está relacionada con la identificación de ciclos cortos en el grafo de Restricciones Geométricas del problema GCS/SF. Su preprocesamiento usa las ya mencionadas técnicas de Geometría Algebraica y Grupos en los problemas locales que corresponden a dichos ciclos. Además de mejorar la eficiencia de la solución, las técnicas de Dividir y Conquistar capturan la esencia física del problema. Esto es ilustrado por medio de su aplicación al análisis de grados de libertad de mecanismos.MSC: 68U0

Survey on assembly sequencing: a combinatorial and geometrical perspective

A systematic overview on the subject of assembly sequencing is presented. Sequencing lies at the core of assembly planning, and variants include finding a feasible sequence—respecting the precedence constraints between the assembly operations—, or determining an optimal one according to one or several operational criteria. The different ways of representing the space of feasible assembly sequences are described, as well as the search and optimization algorithms that can be used. Geometry plays a fundamental role in devising the precedence constraints between assembly operations, and this is the subject of the second part of the survey, which treats also motion in contact in the context of the actual performance of assembly operations.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author’s final draft

On CAD Informed Adaptive Robotic Assembly

We introduce a robotic assembly system that streamlines the design-to-make workflow for going from a CAD model of a product assembly to a fully programmed and adaptive assembly process. Our system captures (in the CAD tool) the intent of the assembly process for a specific robotic workcell and generates a recipe of task-level instructions. By integrating visual sensing with deep-learned perception models, the robots infer the necessary actions to assemble the design from the generated recipe. The perception models are trained directly from simulation, allowing the system to identify various parts based on CAD information. We demonstrate the system with a workcell of two robots to assemble interlocking 3D part designs. We first build and tune the assembly process in simulation, verifying the generated recipe. Finally, the real robotic workcell assembles the design using the same behavior

IkeaBot: An autonomous multi-robot coordinated furniture assembly system

We present an automated assembly system that directs the actions of a team of heterogeneous robots in the completion of an assembly task. From an initial user-supplied geometric specification, the system applies reasoning about the geometry of individual parts in order to deduce how they fit together. The task is then automatically transformed to a symbolic description of the assembly-a sort of blueprint. A symbolic planner generates an assembly sequence that can be executed by a team of collaborating robots. Each robot fulfills one of two roles: parts delivery or parts assembly. The latter are equipped with specialized tools to aid in the assembly process. Additionally, the robots engage in coordinated co-manipulation of large, heavy assemblies. We provide details of an example furniture kit assembled by the system.Boeing Compan