6 research outputs found
Incidence bounds on multijoints and generic joints
A point is a joint formed by a finite collection
of lines in if there exist at least lines in
through that span . It is known that there are
joints formed by .
We say that a point is a multijoint formed by the finite
collections of lines in
if there exist at least lines through , one from each collection,
spanning . We show that there are such points for any
field and , as well as for and any .
Moreover, we say that a point is a generic joint formed
by a finite collection of lines in if each
lines of through form a joint there. We show that, for
and any , there are
generic joints formed by , each lying in lines of
. This result generalises, to all dimensions, a (very small) part
of the main point-line incidence theorem in in
\cite{Guth_Katz_2010} by Guth and Katz.
Finally, we generalise our results in to the case of
multijoints and generic joints formed by real algebraic curves.Comment: Some errors corrected. Theorem 4.4 is now slightly stronger than its
previous version. To appear in Discrete Comput. Geo
Joints tightened
In -dimensional space (over any field), given a set of lines, a joint is a
point passed through by lines not all lying in some hyperplane. The joints
problem asks to determine the maximum number of joints formed by lines, and
it was one of the successes of the Guth--Katz polynomial method.
We prove a new upper bound on the number of joints that matches, up to a
factor, the best known construction: place generic hyperplanes,
and use their -wise intersections to form lines and
their -wise intersections to form joints. Guth conjectured
that this construction is optimal.
Our technique builds on the work on Ruixiang Zhang proving the multijoints
conjecture via an extension of the polynomial method. We set up a variational
problem to control the high order of vanishing of a polynomial at each joint.Comment: 10 page
Discrete analogues of Kakeya problems
This thesis investigates two problems that are discrete analogues of two harmonic analytic
problems which lie in the heart of research in the field.
More specifically, we consider discrete analogues of the maximal Kakeya operator conjecture
and of the recently solved endpoint multilinear Kakeya problem, by effectively
shrinking the tubes involved in these problems to lines, thus giving rise to the problems
of counting joints and multijoints with multiplicities. In fact, we effectively show that,
in R3, what we expect to hold due to the maximal Kakeya operator conjecture, as
well as what we know in the continuous case due to the endpoint multilinear Kakeya
theorem by Guth, still hold in the discrete case. In particular, let L be a collection of L lines in R3 and J the set of joints formed by
L, that is, the set of points each of which lies in at least three non-coplanar lines of L.
It is known that |J| = O(L3/2) ( first proved by Guth and Katz). For each joint x β J,
let the multiplicity N(x) of x be the number of triples of non-coplanar lines through x.
We prove here that X
x2J
N(x)1=2 = O(L3=2);
while we also extend this result to real algebraic curves in R3 of uniformly bounded degree,
as well as to curves in R3 parametrized by real univariate polynomials of uniformly
bounded degree.
The multijoints problem is a variant of the joints problem, involving three finite collections
of lines in R3; a multijoint formed by them is a point that lies in (at least) three
non-coplanar lines, one from each collection.
We finally present some results regarding the joints problem in different field settings
and higher dimensions