8,514 research outputs found
Good Applications for Crummy Entity Linkers? The Case of Corpus Selection in Digital Humanities
Over the last decade we have made great progress in entity linking (EL)
systems, but performance may vary depending on the context and, arguably, there
are even principled limitations preventing a "perfect" EL system. This also
suggests that there may be applications for which current "imperfect" EL is
already very useful, and makes finding the "right" application as important as
building the "right" EL system. We investigate the Digital Humanities use case,
where scholars spend a considerable amount of time selecting relevant source
texts. We developed WideNet; a semantically-enhanced search tool which
leverages the strengths of (imperfect) EL without getting in the way of its
expert users. We evaluate this tool in two historical case-studies aiming to
collect a set of references to historical periods in parliamentary debates from
the last two decades; the first targeted the Dutch Golden Age, and the second
World War II. The case-studies conclude with a critical reflection on the
utility of WideNet for this kind of research, after which we outline how such a
real-world application can help to improve EL technology in general.Comment: Accepted for presentation at SEMANTiCS '1
MCMAS-SLK: A Model Checker for the Verification of Strategy Logic Specifications
We introduce MCMAS-SLK, a BDD-based model checker for the verification of
systems against specifications expressed in a novel, epistemic variant of
strategy logic. We give syntax and semantics of the specification language and
introduce a labelling algorithm for epistemic and strategy logic modalities. We
provide details of the checker which can also be used for synthesising agents'
strategies so that a specification is satisfied by the system. We evaluate the
efficiency of the implementation by discussing the results obtained for the
dining cryptographers protocol and a variant of the cake-cutting problem
Early aspects: aspect-oriented requirements engineering and architecture design
This paper reports on the third Early Aspects: Aspect-Oriented Requirements Engineering and Architecture Design Workshop, which has been held in Lancaster, UK, on March 21, 2004. The workshop included a presentation session and working sessions in which the particular topics on early aspects were discussed. The primary goal of the workshop was to focus on challenges to defining methodical software development processes for aspects from early on in the software life cycle and explore the potential of proposed methods and techniques to scale up to industrial applications
2008 Abstracts Collection -- IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science
This volume contains the proceedings of the 28th international conference on the Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2008), organized under the auspices of the Indian Association for Research in Computing Science (IARCS)
The rise of corporate governance brokers and how they trade in asymmetric information
This paper sets forth that governance brokerage can be regarded as a natural outgrowth of the actual practice of Corporate Governance. To lay the foundations of our subject, firstly we delve into the dual nature of any transaction. Then we move on to define what the expression “governance broker” means, underlining five professional arrangements from which governance intermediation can be achieved. Next, it is shown how trade splits up economic agents’ information sets, giving rise to the brokerage of asymmetric information. Afterwards, we account for the ways a governance broker meets his goals in dyadic and polyadic relationships, bringing forward distinctive courses of action: clinical assistance, consultancy to foster growth and value, governance engineering, tutoring on global standards of governance, mediation in conflicts of interests, even international intermediation.governance broker, information sets, dyadic and polyadic relationships, brokerage of asymmetric information, corporate governance.
Recommended from our members
Why Are People's Decisions Sometimes Worse with Computer Support?
In many applications of computerised decision support, a recognised source of undesired outcomes is operators' apparent over-reliance on automation. For instance, an operator may fail to react to a potentially dangerous situation because a computer fails to generate an alarm. However, the very use of terms like "over-reliance" betrays possible misunderstandings of these phenomena and their causes, which may lead to ineffective corrective action (e.g. training or procedures that do not counteract all the causes of the apparently "over-reliant" behaviour). We review relevant literature in the area of "automation bias" and describe the diverse mechanisms that may be involved in human errors when using computer support. We discuss these mechanisms, with reference to errors of omission when using "alerting systems", with the help of examples of novel counterintuitive findings we obtained from a case study in a health care application, as well as other examples from the literature
MsATL: a Tool for SAT-Based ATL Satisfiability Checking
We present MsATL: the first tool for deciding the satisfiability of
Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL) with imperfect information. MsATL
combines SAT Modulo Monotonic Theories solvers with existing ATL model
checkers: MCMAS and STV. The tool can deal with various semantics of ATL,
including perfect and imperfect information, and can handle additional
practical requirements. MsATL can be applied for synthesis of games that
conform to a given specification, with the synthesised game often being
minimal
Semantics of trace relations in requirements models for consistency checking and inferencing
Requirements traceability is the ability to relate requirements back to stakeholders and forward to corresponding design artifacts, code, and test cases. Although considerable research has been devoted to relating requirements in both forward and backward directions, less attention has been paid to relating requirements with other requirements. Relations between requirements influence a number of activities during software development such as consistency checking and change management. In most approaches and tools, there is a lack of precise definition of requirements relations. In this respect, deficient results may be produced. In this paper, we aim at formal definitions of the relation types in order to enable reasoning about requirements relations. We give a requirements metamodel with commonly used relation types. The semantics of the relations is provided with a formalization in first-order logic. We use the formalization for consistency checking of relations and for inferring new relations. A tool has been built to support both reasoning activities. We illustrate our approach in an example which shows that the formal semantics of relation types enables new relations to be inferred and contradicting relations in requirements documents to be determined. The application of requirements reasoning based on formal semantics resolves many of the deficiencies observed in other approaches. Our tool supports better understanding of dependencies between requirements
- …