Transformations of High-Level Synthesis Codes for High-Performance Computing

Specialized hardware architectures promise a major step in performance and energy efficiency over the traditional load/store devices currently employed in large scale computing systems. The adoption of high-level synthesis (HLS) from languages such as C/C++ and OpenCL has greatly increased programmer productivity when designing for such platforms. While this has enabled a wider audience to target specialized hardware, the optimization principles known from traditional software design are no longer sufficient to implement high-performance codes. Fast and efficient codes for reconfigurable platforms are thus still challenging to design. To alleviate this, we present a set of optimizing transformations for HLS, targeting scalable and efficient architectures for high-performance computing (HPC) applications. Our work provides a toolbox for developers, where we systematically identify classes of transformations, the characteristics of their effect on the HLS code and the resulting hardware (e.g., increases data reuse or resource consumption), and the objectives that each transformation can target (e.g., resolve interface contention, or increase parallelism). We show how these can be used to efficiently exploit pipelining, on-chip distributed fast memory, and on-chip streaming dataflow, allowing for massively parallel architectures. To quantify the effect of our transformations, we use them to optimize a set of throughput-oriented FPGA kernels, demonstrating that our enhancements are sufficient to scale up parallelism within the hardware constraints. With the transformations covered, we hope to establish a common framework for performance engineers, compiler developers, and hardware developers, to tap into the performance potential offered by specialized hardware architectures using HLS

AutoAccel: Automated Accelerator Generation and Optimization with Composable, Parallel and Pipeline Architecture

CPU-FPGA heterogeneous architectures are attracting ever-increasing attention in an attempt to advance computational capabilities and energy efficiency in today's datacenters. These architectures provide programmers with the ability to reprogram the FPGAs for flexible acceleration of many workloads. Nonetheless, this advantage is often overshadowed by the poor programmability of FPGAs whose programming is conventionally a RTL design practice. Although recent advances in high-level synthesis (HLS) significantly improve the FPGA programmability, it still leaves programmers facing the challenge of identifying the optimal design configuration in a tremendous design space. This paper aims to address this challenge and pave the path from software programs towards high-quality FPGA accelerators. Specifically, we first propose the composable, parallel and pipeline (CPP) microarchitecture as a template of accelerator designs. Such a well-defined template is able to support efficient accelerator designs for a broad class of computation kernels, and more importantly, drastically reduce the design space. Also, we introduce an analytical model to capture the performance and resource trade-offs among different design configurations of the CPP microarchitecture, which lays the foundation for fast design space exploration. On top of the CPP microarchitecture and its analytical model, we develop the AutoAccel framework to make the entire accelerator generation automated. AutoAccel accepts a software program as an input and performs a series of code transformations based on the result of the analytical-model-based design space exploration to construct the desired CPP microarchitecture. Our experiments show that the AutoAccel-generated accelerators outperform their corresponding software implementations by an average of 72x for a broad class of computation kernels

A Fast and Accurate Cost Model for FPGA Design Space Exploration in HPC Applications

Heterogeneous High-Performance Computing (HPC) platforms present a significant programming challenge, especially because the key users of HPC resources are scientists, not parallel programmers. We contend that compiler technology has to evolve to automatically create the best program variant by transforming a given original program. We have developed a novel methodology based on type transformations for generating correct-by-construction design variants, and an associated light-weight cost model for evaluating these variants for implementation on FPGAs. In this paper we present a key enabler of our approach, the cost model. We discuss how we are able to quickly derive accurate estimates of performance and resource-utilization from the design’s representation in our intermediate language. We show results confirming the accuracy of our cost model by testing it on three different scientific kernels. We conclude with a case-study that compares a solution generated by our framework with one from a conventional high-level synthesis tool, showing better performance and power-efficiency using our cost model based approach

Exploring heterogeneous scheduling for edge computing with CPU and FPGA MPSoCs

This paper presents a framework targeted to low-cost and low-power heterogeneous MultiProcessors that exploits FPGAs and multicore CPUs, with the overarching goal of providing developers with a productive programming model and runtime support to fully use all the processing resources available. FPGA productivity is achieved using a high-level programming model based on OpenCL, the standard for cross-platform parallel heterogeneous programming. In this work, we focus on the parallel for pattern, and as part of the runtime support for this pattern, we leverage a new scheduler that strives to maximize the number of iterations per joule by dynamically and adaptively partitioning the iteration space between the multicore and the accelerator when working simultaneously. A total of 7 benchmarks are ported and optimized for a low-cost DE1 board. The results show that the heterogeneous solution can improve performance up to 2.9x and increases energy efficiency up to 2.7x compared tothe traditional approach of keeping all the CPU cores idle while the accelerator computes the workload. Our results also demonstrate two interesting insights: First, an adaptive scheduler able to find at runtime the right chunk size for each type of application and device configuration is an essential component for these kinds of heterogeneous platforms, and second, device configurations that provide higher throughput do not always achieve better energy eciency when only the running power (excluding the idle power component) is considered