Handling Overlapping Asymmetric Data Sets—A Twice Penalized P-Spline Approach

Aims: Overlapping asymmetric data sets are where a large cohort of observations have a small amount of information recorded, and within this group there exists a smaller cohort which have extensive further information available. Missing imputation is unwise if cohort size differs substantially; therefore, we aim to develop a way of modelling the smaller cohort whilst considering the larger. Methods: Through considering traditionally once penalized P-Spline approximations, we create a second penalty term through observing discrepancies in the marginal value of covariates that exist in both cohorts. Our now twice penalized P-Spline is designed to firstly prevent over/under-fitting of the smaller cohort and secondly to consider the larger cohort. Results: Through a series of data simulations, penalty parameter tunings, and model adaptations, our twice penalized model offers up to a 58% and 46% improvement in model fit upon a continuous and binary response, respectively, against existing B-Spline and once penalized P-Spline methods. Applying our model to an individual’s risk of developing steatohepatitis, we report an over 65% improvement over existing methods. Conclusions: We propose a twice penalized P-Spline method which can vastly improve the model fit of overlapping asymmetric data sets upon a common predictive endpoint, without the need for missing data imputation

Handling Overlapping Asymmetric Data Sets—A Twice Penalized P-Spline Approach

\ua9 2024 by the authors.Aims: Overlapping asymmetric data sets are where a large cohort of observations have a small amount of information recorded, and within this group there exists a smaller cohort which have extensive further information available. Missing imputation is unwise if cohort size differs substantially; therefore, we aim to develop a way of modelling the smaller cohort whilst considering the larger. Methods: Through considering traditionally once penalized P-Spline approximations, we create a second penalty term through observing discrepancies in the marginal value of covariates that exist in both cohorts. Our now twice penalized P-Spline is designed to firstly prevent over/under-fitting of the smaller cohort and secondly to consider the larger cohort. Results: Through a series of data simulations, penalty parameter tunings, and model adaptations, our twice penalized model offers up to a 58% and 46% improvement in model fit upon a continuous and binary response, respectively, against existing B-Spline and once penalized P-Spline methods. Applying our model to an individual’s risk of developing steatohepatitis, we report an over 65% improvement over existing methods. Conclusions: We propose a twice penalized P-Spline method which can vastly improve the model fit of overlapping asymmetric data sets upon a common predictive endpoint, without the need for missing data imputation

Handling Overlapping Asymmetric Datasets -- A Twice Penalized P-Spline Approach

Overlapping asymmetric datasets are common in data science and pose questions of how they can be incorporated together into a predictive analysis. In healthcare datasets there is often a small amount of information that is available for a larger number of patients such as an electronic health record, however a small number of patients may have had extensive further testing. Common solutions such as missing imputation can often be unwise if the smaller cohort is significantly different in scale to the larger sample, therefore the aim of this research is to develop a new method which can model the smaller cohort against a particular response, whilst considering the larger cohort also. Motivated by non-parametric models, and specifically flexible smoothing techniques via generalized additive models, we model a twice penalized P-Spline approximation method to firstly prevent over/under-fitting of the smaller cohort and secondly to consider the larger cohort. This second penalty is created through discrepancies in the marginal value of covariates that exist in both the smaller and larger cohorts. Through data simulations, parameter tunings and model adaptations to consider a continuous and binary response, we find our twice penalized approach offers an enhanced fit over a linear B-Spline and once penalized P-Spline approximation. Applying to a real-life dataset relating to a person's risk of developing Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis, we see an improved model fit performance of over 65%. Areas for future work within this space include adapting our method to not require dimensionality reduction and also consider parametric modelling methods. However, to our knowledge this is the first work to propose additional marginal penalties in a flexible regression of which we can report a vastly improved model fit that is able to consider asymmetric datasets, without the need for missing data imputation.Comment: 52 pages, 17 figures, 8 tables, 34 reference