3,252 research outputs found

    The Feasibility of Use of Caecal and Diverticular Coloration in Field Determination of Grasshopper Diet

    Get PDF
    Excerpt: Many studies have been undertaken in the past on the food selection, food preferences, and economic damage of various grasshoppers and their allies. Among the more salient of these researches are those of Anderson (1961, 1964); Ball (1 936); Bindra (1958); Boldyrev (1928); Blackith and Blackith (1966); Brues (1946); Chapman (1957); Dibble (1940); Gangwere (1959, 1960, 1961, 1965, 1965a, 1966, 1966a, 1967);Husain etal. (1946); Isely (1938, 1946); Isely and Alexander (1949); Joyce (1952); Mulkern and Anderson (1959); Mulkern, Anderson, and Brusven (1962); Mulkern et al. (1969); Pfadt (1949); Riley (1878); Roonwal (1953); Savin (1927); Weiss (1924); and Williams (1954). Techniques useful in the investigation of food selection are to be found in certain of the above reports. Especially noteworthy in this respect are those by Blackith and Blackith, Chapman, Gangwere (1961), Isely and Alexander, Joyce, Mulkern and Anderson, Pfadt, Roonwal, and Savin. The relatively new technique of Blackith and Blackith (1966) involves the comparison of colorations in the ileal diverticula of morabine grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Eumastacidae). The digestive caeca of eumastacids were previously discussed by Slifer (1944), and those of other groups by Gangwere (1966) in a comprehensive paper dealing with the mechanical handling of food in the orthopteroid alimentary canal. There is also an extensive literature on the gut physiology of these insects, some of which is appropriate to a consideration of the caeca and diverticula

    Determinants of habitat use and community structure of rodents in northern shortgrass steppe

    Get PDF
    1996 Spring.Includes bibliographical references.Patterns of distribution and abundance of small mammals reflect the responses of individuals to the spatial and temporal availability of resources and abiotic conditions, as well as interactions with conspecifics and other species. I examined habitat selection of two rodents, the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) and the northern grasshopper mouse (Onychomys leucogaster), on shortgrass steppe in north-central Colorado. Both species consume arthropods when these resources are plentiful, but grasshopper mice prey on other rodents and thus may have both competitive and predatory effects on deer mice. To examine these interactions, I conducted a removal experiment to determine the effect of grasshopper mice on microhabitat use, diet, and abundance of deer mice, and an odor-response experiment to determine whether olfactory cues mediate interactions between these species. Deer mice preferred shrubs at both individual and population levels, presumably to reduce predation risk. Mice oriented movements toward shrubs and traveled under shrubs more often than expected based on the density of shrubs on study plots. Population density also increased with increasing shrub density and aggregation. The response of mice to shrub cover was non-linear. Thresholds in the selective use of shrubs, movement patterns, and abundance occurred over a narrow range of shrub cover where shrubs were most aggregated, underscoring the importance of both shrub density and dispersion. Mice tended to accumulate in areas where their movements were most tortuous, suggesting that it is possible to generate testable predictions about patterns of abundance from individual movements. In contrast, grasshopper mice showed no affinity for shrub microhabitats, and instead oriented movements towards rodent burrows and disturbances created by pocket gophers (Thomomys talpoides). Results from pitfall trapping in different microhabitat types suggested that grasshopper mice used gopher mounds and burrows because of the concentration of insect prey in these microhabitats. The abundance of these microhabitats also was a better predictor of grasshopper-mouse abundance than were broad-scale, qualitative descriptors of macrohabitat type. The significance of these microhabitats across scales demonstrates the importance of spatial and temporal availability of prey to grasshopper mice. Even though grasshopper mice and deer mice show different habitat affinities, grasshopper mice may affect the surface activity and abundance of deer mice in areas where they co-occur. Deer mice decreased in number throughout the removal experiment on both control and removal sites, but the decline was greatest on controls, where grasshopper-mouse numbers increased. No shifts in microhabitat use were detected on removal sites, but deer mice increased their use of shrubs on control sites when grasshopper mice were most abundant. Because diets of deer mice did not differ between control and removal sites during the experiment, grasshopper mice apparently influenced the behavior and populations of deer mice through predation or interference rather than resource competition. Increases in the abundance of granivorous rodents on removal sites support this conclusion, and suggest that grasshopper mice, when abundant, can impact the composition of local assemblages on shortgrass steppe. However, if deer mice actively avoid contact with grasshopper mice, it is unlikely that this interaction is mediated by olfactory cues. When presented with odors of grasshopper mice, harvest mice, and clean cotton, deer mice showed no avoidance of grasshopper-mouse odors, regardless of season, sex or reproductive condition of respondents, or history of contact with grasshopper mice

    Survival and Food Detection by First-Instar \u3ci\u3eMelanoplus Femurrubrum\u3c/i\u3e (Orthoptera: Acrididae)

    Get PDF
    Newly hatched Melanoplus femurrubrum (DeGeer) were evaluated for survival without food under various moisture, temperature, and light conditions. Although nymphs survived up to 113 h without food, they required food 48-W h after hatching to ensure continued survival and growth. Olfactory food detection was very limited and feeding tended to occur on the first suitable food encountered. Food covered with a ftlm of water and held within several millimetres of the palpi evoked palpal vibrations followed by antennal movements. The evidence suggests that hygroreceptors occur on the pa\pi and pa\pa\ stimulation is necessary before antennal olfaction occurs

    Estimating offsets for avian displacement effects of anthropogenic impacts

    Get PDF
    Biodiversity offsetting, or compensatory mitigation, is increasingly being used in temperate grassland ecosystems to compensate for unavoidable environmental damage from anthropogenic developments such as transportation infrastructure, urbanization, and energy development. Pursuit of energy independence in the United States will expand domestic energy production. Concurrent with this increased growth is increased disruption to wildlife habitats, including avian displacement from suitable breeding habitat. Recent studies at energy-extraction and energy-generation facilities have provided evidence for behavioral avoidance and thus reduced use of habitat by breeding waterfowl and grassland birds in the vicinity of energy infrastructure. To quantify and compensate for this loss in value of avian breeding habitat, it is necessary to determine a biologically based currency so that the sufficiency of offsets in terms of biological equivalent value can be obtained. We describe a method for quantifying the amount of habitat needed to provide equivalent biological value for avifauna displaced by energy and transportation infrastructure, based on the ability to define five metrics: impact distance, impact area, pre-impact density, percent displacement, and offset density. We calculate percent displacement values for breeding waterfowl and grassland birds and demonstrate the applicability of our avian-impact offset method using examples for wind and oil infrastructure. We also apply our method to an example in which the biological value of the offset habitat is similar to the impacted habitat, based on similarity in habitat type (e.g., native prairie), geographical location, land use, and landscape composition, as well as to an example in which the biological value of the offset habitat is dissimilar to the impacted habitat. We provide a worksheet that informs potential users how to apply our method to their specific developments and a framework for developing decision-support tools aimed at achieving landscape-level conservation goals

    Curvature-controlled defect dynamics in active systems

    Full text link
    We have studied the collective motion of polar active particles confined to ellipsoidal surfaces. The geometric constraints lead to the formation of vortices that encircle surface points of constant curvature (umbilics). We have found that collective motion patterns are particularly rich on ellipsoids, with four umbilics where vortices tend to be located near pairs of umbilical points to minimize their interaction energy. Our results provide a new perspective on the migration of living cells, which most likely use the information provided from the curved substrate geometry to guide their collective motion.Comment: Accepted manuscript. 8 pages, 7 Figures. Movies of the motion patterns can be found at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEsE7_tnqXZ_U258VwxES8KAJTV_eO43

    Grasshopper DCMD : an undergraduate electrophysiology lab for investigating single-unit responses to behaviorally-relevant stimuli

    Get PDF
    Author Posting. © Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 2017. This article is posted here by permission of Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education 15 (2017): A162-A173.Avoiding capture from a fast-approaching predator is an important survival skill shared by many animals. Investigating the neural circuits that give rise to this escape behavior can provide a tractable demonstration of systems-level neuroscience research for undergraduate laboratories. In this paper, we describe three related hands-on exercises using the grasshopper and affordable technology to bring neurophysiology, neuroethology, and neural computation to life and enhance student understanding and interest. We simplified a looming stimuli procedure using the Backyard Brains SpikerBox bioamplifier, an open-source and low-cost electrophysiology rig, to extracellularly record activity of the descending contralateral movement detector (DCMD) neuron from the grasshopper’s neck. The DCMD activity underlies the grasshopper's motor responses to looming monocular visual cues and can easily be recorded and analyzed on an open-source iOS oscilloscope app, Spike Recorder. Visual stimuli are presented to the grasshopper by this same mobile application allowing for synchronized recording of stimuli and neural activity. An in-app spike-sorting algorithm is described that allows a quick way for students to record, sort, and analyze their data at the bench. We also describe a way for students to export these data to other analysis tools. With the protocol described, students will be able to prepare the grasshopper, find and record from the DCMD neuron, and visualize the DCMD responses to quantitatively investigate the escape system by adjusting the speed and size of simulated approaching objects. We describe the results from 22 grasshoppers, where 50 of the 57 recording sessions (87.7%) had a reliable DCMD response. Finally, we field-tested our experiment in an undergraduate neuroscience laboratory and found that a majority of students (67%) could perform this exercise in one two-hour lab setting, and had an increase in interest for studying the neural systems that drive behavior.Funding for this project was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health Small Business Innovation Research grant #2R44MH093334: “Backyard Brains: Bringing Neurophysiology into Secondary Schools.

    Topologically Restricted Appearance in the Developing Chick Retinotectal System of Bravo, a Neural Surface Protein: Experimental Modulation by Environmental Cues

    Get PDF
    A novel neural surface protein, Bravo, shows a pattern of topological restriction in the embryonic chick retinotectal system. Bravo is present on the developing optic fibers in the retina; however, retinal axons in the tectum do not display Bravo. The appearance of Bravo in vitro is modulated by environmental cues. Axons growing out from retinal explants on retinal basal lamina, their natural substrate, express Bravo, whereas such axons growing on collagen do not. Retinal explants provide a valuable system to characterize the mechanism of Bravo restriction, as well as the cellular signals controlling it. Bravo was identified with monoclonal antibodies from a collection generated against exposed molecules isolated by using a selective cell surface biotinylation procedure. The NH2-terminal sequence of Bravo shows similarity with L1, a neural surface molecule which is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily. This possible relationship to L1, together with its restricted appearance, suggests an involvement of Bravo in axonal growth and guidance
    • 

    corecore