Decomposing Cubic Graphs into Connected Subgraphs of Size Three

Let $S=\{K_{1,3},K_3,P_4\}$ be the set of connected graphs of size 3. We study the problem of partitioning the edge set of a graph $G$ into graphs taken from any non-empty $S'\subseteq S$. The problem is known to be NP-complete for any possible choice of $S'$ in general graphs. In this paper, we assume that the input graph is cubic, and study the computational complexity of the problem of partitioning its edge set for any choice of $S'$. We identify all polynomial and NP-complete problems in that setting, and give graph-theoretic characterisations of $S'$-decomposable cubic graphs in some cases.Comment: to appear in the proceedings of COCOON 201

Transversal designs and induced decompositions of graphs

We prove that for every complete multipartite graph $F$ there exist very dense graphs $G_n$ on $n$ vertices, namely with as many as ${n\choose 2}-cn$ edges for all $n$, for some constant $c=c(F)$, such that $G_n$ can be decomposed into edge-disjoint induced subgraphs isomorphic to~$F$. This result identifies and structurally explains a gap between the growth rates $O(n)$ and $\Omega(n^{3/2})$ on the minimum number of non-edges in graphs admitting an induced $F$-decomposition

Between Treewidth and Clique-width

Many hard graph problems can be solved efficiently when restricted to graphs of bounded treewidth, and more generally to graphs of bounded clique-width. But there is a price to be paid for this generality, exemplified by the four problems MaxCut, Graph Coloring, Hamiltonian Cycle and Edge Dominating Set that are all FPT parameterized by treewidth but none of which can be FPT parameterized by clique-width unless FPT = W[1], as shown by Fomin et al [7, 8]. We therefore seek a structural graph parameter that shares some of the generality of clique-width without paying this price. Based on splits, branch decompositions and the work of Vatshelle [18] on Maximum Matching-width, we consider the graph parameter sm-width which lies between treewidth and clique-width. Some graph classes of unbounded treewidth, like distance-hereditary graphs, have bounded sm-width. We show that MaxCut, Graph Coloring, Hamiltonian Cycle and Edge Dominating Set are all FPT parameterized by sm-width

A Generalization of the Hamilton-Waterloo Problem on Complete Equipartite Graphs

The Hamilton-Waterloo problem asks for which $s$ and $r$ the complete graph $K_n$ can be decomposed into $s$ copies of a given 2-factor $F_1$ and $r$ copies of a given 2-factor $F_2$ (and one copy of a 1-factor if $n$ is even). In this paper we generalize the problem to complete equipartite graphs $K_{(n:m)}$ and show that $K_{(xyzw:m)}$ can be decomposed into $s$ copies of a 2-factor consisting of cycles of length $xzm$; and $r$ copies of a 2-factor consisting of cycles of length $yzm$, whenever $m$ is odd, $s,r\neq 1$, $\gcd(x,z)=\gcd(y,z)=1$ and $xyz\neq 0 \pmod 4$. We also give some more general constructions where the cycles in a given two factor may have different lengths. We use these constructions to find solutions to the Hamilton-Waterloo problem for complete graphs

On the Generalised Colouring Numbers of Graphs that Exclude a Fixed Minor

The generalised colouring numbers $\mathrm{col}_r(G)$ and $\mathrm{wcol}_r(G)$ were introduced by Kierstead and Yang as a generalisation of the usual colouring number, and have since then found important theoretical and algorithmic applications. In this paper, we dramatically improve upon the known upper bounds for generalised colouring numbers for graphs excluding a fixed minor, from the exponential bounds of Grohe et al. to a linear bound for the $r$-colouring number $\mathrm{col}_r$ and a polynomial bound for the weak $r$-colouring number $\mathrm{wcol}_r$. In particular, we show that if $G$ excludes $K_t$ as a minor, for some fixed $t\ge4$, then $\mathrm{col}_r(G)\le\binom{t-1}{2}\,(2r+1)$ and $\mathrm{wcol}_r(G)\le\binom{r+t-2}{t-2}\cdot(t-3)(2r+1)\in\mathcal{O}(r^{\,t-1})$. In the case of graphs $G$ of bounded genus $g$, we improve the bounds to $\mathrm{col}_r(G)\le(2g+3)(2r+1)$ (and even $\mathrm{col}_r(G)\le5r+1$ if $g=0$, i.e. if $G$ is planar) and $\mathrm{wcol}_r(G)\le\Bigl(2g+\binom{r+2}{2}\Bigr)\,(2r+1)$.Comment: 21 pages, to appear in European Journal of Combinatoric