14 research outputs found

    Agrifood Campaign Planning

    Get PDF
    The challenge was to find ways for the players in an agricultural food supply chain to interact in ways that enable the chain to operate more efficiently. What information do they need to exchange, and what incentives need to be in place between them? What software would help the information exchange and responsive actions to take place? The problem was thought about with the UK sugar beet industry as the working example, but similar considerations, with many differences of detail, are expected to apply in other contexts

    Empirical Framework for Cournot Oligopoly with Private Information

    Full text link
    We propose an empirical framework for asymmetric Cournot oligopoly with private information about variable costs. First, considering a linear demand for a homogenous product with a random intercept, we characterize the Bayesian Cournot-Nash equilibrium. Then we establish the identification of the joint distribution of demand and firm-specific cost distributions. Following the identification steps, we propose a likelihood-based estimation method and apply it to the global market for crude-oil and quantify the welfare effect of private information. We also consider extensions of the model to include either product differentiation, conduct parameters, nonlinear demand, or selective entry.Comment: forthcoming, The RAND Journal of Economic

    The War of Rare Earth Elements: A Dynamic Game Approach

    Get PDF
    Rare earth elements govern today’s high-tech world and are deemed to be essential for the attainment of sustainable development goals. Since the 1990s, these elements have been predominantly supplied by one single actor, China. However, due to the increasing global relevance of their availability, other countries are now encouraged to enter the market. The objective of this paper is to analyze the strategic interactions among (potential) suppliers. In particular, we are interested in (1) the optimal timing for a newcomer (e.g. the U.S.) to enter the market, (2) the incumbent’s (i.e. China’s) optimal behavior, and (3) the cost-efficiency of cooperative vs. competitive market relations. By setting up a continuous-time dynamic game model, we show that (1) the newcomer should postpone the production launch until its rare earth reserves coincide with those of the incumbent, (2) the incumbent should strive for a late market entry and therefore keep its monopolistic resource extraction at the lowest possible level, (3) compared to the payoffs under competition, cooperation leads to a Pareto improvement when started at an early stage. The findings of our model are particularly relevant for the rational strategic positioning of the two great powers, America and China
    corecore