A Presheaf Semantics of Value-Passing Processes

This paper investigates presheaf models for process calculi withvalue passing. Denotational semantics in presheaf models are shownto correspond to operational semantics in that bisimulation obtainedfrom open maps is proved to coincide with bisimulation as definedtraditionally from the operational semantics. Both "early" and "late"semantics are considered, though the more interesting "late" semanticsis emphasised. A presheaf model and denotational semantics is proposedfor a language allowing process passing, though there remainsthe problem of relating the notion of bisimulation obtained from openmaps to a more traditional definition from the operational semantics.A tentative beginning is made of a "domain theory" supportingpresheaf models

A Denotational Semantics for Communicating Unstructured Code

An important property of programming language semantics is that they should be compositional. However, unstructured low-level code contains goto-like commands making it hard to define a semantics that is compositional. In this paper, we follow the ideas of Saabas and Uustalu to structure low-level code. This gives us the possibility to define a compositional denotational semantics based on least fixed points to allow for the use of inductive verification methods. We capture the semantics of communication using finite traces similar to the denotations of CSP. In addition, we examine properties of this semantics and give an example that demonstrates reasoning about communication and jumps. With this semantics, we lay the foundations for a proof calculus that captures both, the semantics of unstructured low-level code and communication.Comment: In Proceedings FESCA 2015, arXiv:1503.0437

Metric Semantics and Full Abstractness for Action Refinement and Probabilistic Choice

This paper provides a case-study in the field of metric semantics for probabilistic programming. Both an operational and a denotational semantics are presented for an abstract process language L_pr, which features action refinement and probabilistic choice. The two models are constructed in the setting of complete ultrametric spaces, here based on probability measures of compact support over sequences of actions. It is shown that the standard toolkit for metric semantics works well in the probabilistic context of L_pr, e.g. in establishing the correctness of the denotational semantics with respect to the operational one. In addition, it is shown how the method of proving full abstraction --as proposed recently by the authors for a nondeterministic language with action refinement-- can be adapted to deal with the probabilistic language L_pr as well

Comparative metric semantics for concurrent Prolog

AbstractThis paper shows the equivalence of two semantics for a version of Concurrent Prolog with non-flat guards: an operational semantics based on a transition system and a denotational semantics which is a metric semantics (the domains are metric spaces). We do this in the following manner. First a uniform language L is considered, that is a language where the atomic actions have arbitrary interpretations. For this language we define an operational and a denotational semantics, and we prove that the denotational semantics is correct with respect to the operational semantics. This result relies on Banach's fixed point theorem. Techniques stemming from imperative languages are used. Then we show how to translate a Concurrent Prolog program to a program in L by selecting certain basic sets for L and then instantiating the interpretation function for the atomic actions. In this way we induce the two semantics for Concurrent Prolog and the equivalence between the two semantics

Process Algebras

Process Algebras are mathematically rigorous languages with well defined semantics that permit describing and verifying properties of concurrent communicating systems. They can be seen as models of processes, regarded as agents that act and interact continuously with other similar agents and with their common environment. The agents may be real-world objects (even people), or they may be artifacts, embodied perhaps in computer hardware or software systems. Many different approaches (operational, denotational, algebraic) are taken for describing the meaning of processes. However, the operational approach is the reference one. By relying on the so called Structural Operational Semantics (SOS), labelled transition systems are built and composed by using the different operators of the many different process algebras. Behavioral equivalences are used to abstract from unwanted details and identify those systems that react similarly to external experiments

Action semantics in retrospect

This paper is a themed account of the action semantics project, which Peter Mosses has led since the 1980s. It explains his motivations for developing action semantics, the inspirations behind its design, and the foundations of action semantics based on unified algebras. It goes on to outline some applications of action semantics to describe real programming languages, and some efforts to implement programming languages using action semantics directed compiler generation. It concludes by outlining more recent developments and reflecting on the success of the action semantics project