Leveraging Reward Consistency for Interpretable Feature Discovery in Reinforcement Learning

The black-box nature of deep reinforcement learning (RL) hinders them from real-world applications. Therefore, interpreting and explaining RL agents have been active research topics in recent years. Existing methods for post-hoc explanations usually adopt the action matching principle to enable an easy understanding of vision-based RL agents. In this paper, it is argued that the commonly used action matching principle is more like an explanation of deep neural networks (DNNs) than the interpretation of RL agents. It may lead to irrelevant or misplaced feature attribution when different DNNs' outputs lead to the same rewards or different rewards result from the same outputs. Therefore, we propose to consider rewards, the essential objective of RL agents, as the essential objective of interpreting RL agents as well. To ensure reward consistency during interpretable feature discovery, a novel framework (RL interpreting RL, denoted as RL-in-RL) is proposed to solve the gradient disconnection from actions to rewards. We verify and evaluate our method on the Atari 2600 games as well as Duckietown, a challenging self-driving car simulator environment. The results show that our method manages to keep reward (or return) consistency and achieves high-quality feature attribution. Further, a series of analytical experiments validate our assumption of the action matching principle's limitations

Unsupervised representation learning in interactive environments

Extraire une représentation de tous les facteurs de haut niveau de l'état d'un agent à partir d'informations sensorielles de bas niveau est une tâche importante, mais difficile, dans l'apprentissage automatique. Dans ce memoire, nous explorerons plusieurs approches non supervisées pour apprendre ces représentations. Nous appliquons et analysons des méthodes d'apprentissage de représentations non supervisées existantes dans des environnements d'apprentissage par renforcement, et nous apportons notre propre suite d'évaluations et notre propre méthode novatrice d'apprentissage de représentations d'état. Dans le premier chapitre de ce travail, nous passerons en revue et motiverons l'apprentissage non supervisé de représentations pour l'apprentissage automatique en général et pour l'apprentissage par renforcement. Nous introduirons ensuite un sous-domaine relativement nouveau de l'apprentissage de représentations : l'apprentissage auto-supervisé. Nous aborderons ensuite deux approches fondamentales de l'apprentissage de représentations, les méthodes génératives et les méthodes discriminatives. Plus précisément, nous nous concentrerons sur une collection de méthodes discriminantes d'apprentissage de représentations, appelées méthodes contrastives d'apprentissage de représentations non supervisées (CURL). Nous terminerons le premier chapitre en détaillant diverses approches pour évaluer l'utilité des représentations. Dans le deuxième chapitre, nous présenterons un article de workshop dans lequel nous évaluons un ensemble de méthodes d'auto-supervision standards pour les problèmes d'apprentissage par renforcement. Nous découvrons que la performance de ces représentations dépend fortement de la dynamique et de la structure de l'environnement. À ce titre, nous déterminons qu'une étude plus systématique des environnements et des méthodes est nécessaire. Notre troisième chapitre couvre notre deuxième article, Unsupervised State Representation Learning in Atari, où nous essayons d'effectuer une étude plus approfondie des méthodes d'apprentissage de représentations en apprentissage par renforcement, comme expliqué dans le deuxième chapitre. Pour faciliter une évaluation plus approfondie des représentations en apprentissage par renforcement, nous introduisons une suite de 22 jeux Atari entièrement labellisés. De plus, nous choisissons de comparer les méthodes d'apprentissage de représentations de façon plus systématique, en nous concentrant sur une comparaison entre méthodes génératives et méthodes contrastives, plutôt que les méthodes générales du deuxième chapitre choisies de façon moins systématique. Enfin, nous introduisons une nouvelle méthode contrastive, ST-DIM, qui excelle sur ces 22 jeux Atari.Extracting a representation of all the high-level factors of an agent’s state from level-level sensory information is an important, but challenging task in machine learning. In this thesis, we will explore several unsupervised approaches for learning these state representations. We apply and analyze existing unsupervised representation learning methods in reinforcement learning environments, as well as contribute our own evaluation benchmark and our own novel state representation learning method. In the first chapter, we will overview and motivate unsupervised representation learning for machine learning in general and for reinforcement learning. We will then introduce a relatively new subfield of representation learning: self-supervised learning. We will then cover two core representation learning approaches, generative methods and discriminative methods. Specifically, we will focus on a collection of discriminative representation learning methods called contrastive unsupervised representation learning (CURL) methods. We will close the first chapter by detailing various approaches for evaluating the usefulness of representations. In the second chapter, we will present a workshop paper, where we evaluate a handful of off-the-shelf self-supervised methods in reinforcement learning problems. We discover that the performance of these representations depends heavily on the dynamics and visual structure of the environment. As such, we determine that a more systematic study of environments and methods is required. Our third chapter covers our second article, Unsupervised State Representation Learning in Atari, where we try to execute a more thorough study of representation learning methods in RL as motivated by the second chapter. To facilitate a more thorough evaluation of representations in RL we introduce a benchmark of 22 fully labelled Atari games. In addition, we choose the representation learning methods for comparison in a more systematic way by focusing on comparing generative methods with contrastive methods, instead of the less systematically chosen off-the-shelf methods from the second chapter. Finally, we introduce a new contrastive method, ST-DIM, which excels at the 22 Atari games

MSVIPER: Improved Policy Distillation for Reinforcement-Learning-Based Robot Navigation

We present Multiple Scenario Verifiable Reinforcement Learning via Policy Extraction (MSVIPER), a new method for policy distillation to decision trees for improved robot navigation. MSVIPER learns an "expert" policy using any Reinforcement Learning (RL) technique involving learning a state-action mapping and then uses imitation learning to learn a decision-tree policy from it. We demonstrate that MSVIPER results in efficient decision trees and can accurately mimic the behavior of the expert policy. Moreover, we present efficient policy distillation and tree-modification techniques that take advantage of the decision tree structure to allow improvements to a policy without retraining. We use our approach to improve the performance of RL-based robot navigation algorithms for indoor and outdoor scenes. We demonstrate the benefits in terms of reduced freezing and oscillation behaviors (by up to 95\% reduction) for mobile robots navigating among dynamic obstacles and reduced vibrations and oscillation (by up to 17\%) for outdoor robot navigation on complex, uneven terrains.Comment: 6 pages main paper, 2 pages of references, 5 page appendix (13 pages total) 5 tables, 9 algorithms, 4 figure

Playful mapping in the digital age:The Playful Mapping Collective

From Mah-Jong, to the introduction of Prussian war-games, through to the emergence of location-based play: maps and play share a long and diverse history. This monograph shows how mapping and playing unfold in the digital age, when the relations between these apparently separate tropes are increasingly woven together. Fluid networks of interaction have encouraged a proliferation of hybrid forms of mapping and playing and a rich plethora of contemporary case-studies, ranging from fieldwork, golf, activism and automotive navigation, to pervasive and desktop-based games evidences this trend. Examining these cases shows how mapping and playing can form productive synergies, but also encourages new ways of being, knowing and shaping our everyday lives. The chapters in this book explore how play can be more than just an object or practice, and instead focus on its potential as a method for understanding maps and spatiality. They show how playing and mapping can be liberating, dangerous, subversive and performative