40 research outputs found

    ํ•€ํ‹€ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ํ˜•์ƒ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ถ„๋ฌด ํŠน์„ฑ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ธฐ๊ณ„ํ•ญ๊ณต๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2020. 8. ์œค์˜๋นˆ.Recently, as interest in low-cost reusable launch vehicles has increased with the micro-satellite market, soft-landing techniques have become important. A pintle injector can help realize this because it is capable of thrust control. After being devised by TRW, it has been developed and researched since the early 2000s. However, published literature and information are limited and still lacks in the design of the geometry. In particular, the pintle injector has many geometric parameters that affect its performance, so research on these is essential. This study examined the relationship between main geometric parameters and spray characteristics. Since the spray characteristics of the pintle injector are closely related to the combustion efficiency, it was analyzed through cold test. First of all, internal flow passage design was carried out to evenly inject the fluids for small thruster with a thrust ratio of 5:1. Various geometry cases were designed to maintain the axial concentricity of the drive part, and optimal geometry condition was derived through experiments and numerical analysis. Afterwards, the effects of the gap distance (G), a factor related to the control of annular flows orifice area, on the spray characteristics were investigated. When G decreased at the same throttling level, the spray angle decreased because the momentum of the annular flow became relatively large. When G was fixed, the spray angle was almost constant even though the throttling level was changed. Droplet diameter also had a proportional relationship with G. Through the relationship between SMD and Weber number (We) and momentum flux ratio (J), it was found that pintle injector has two main atomization mechanisms. At the pintle tip, when the radial and annular flows collided vertically, there was breakup of the liquid sheet due to the difference in momentum, and additional breakup due to the shear force at the interface of the two fluids. The experimental correlations for the spray angle and SMD were obtained, and through this, the control range of G to maintain a specific SMD in all thrust levels was derived. Cold test was also performed on another important geometric factor, skip distance. As the skip distance increased, the spray angle and SMD had a proportional relationship. While annular flow moved along the pintle surface, the velocity decreased due to the interaction between friction and the ambient air. Due to this, the momentum loss rate increased and such a tendency appeared. Change rate in the spray characteristics due to the skip distance became larger under the low thrust level, and showed the maximum change especially under the throttling level of 20%. In order to analyze these trends in more detail, numerical analysis of the axial direction velocity of the annular flow near the pintle surface was carried out. In all throttling levels, developed region with a similar velocity profile was observed after a potential core where the velocity remained constant from the orifice exit to a certain distance. In particular, it was found that the potential core region was the shortest and the velocity decay rate was the highest under the throttling level of 20%. As a result, the change rate of the spray angle and SMD seemed to be largest at the throttling level of 20%. Through the decay rate of velocity according to the skip distance, variation rates of the spray angle and SMD were obtained. Finally, from the design perspective, appropriate skip distance was proposed in consideration of the standard deviation between each throttling level. From this study, databases on the important geometric parameters were obtained. These results are expected to help understand the relationship between the skip distance and spray characteristics. In addition, it can be used to design a thrust control system to improve the spray efficiency as a reference for setting the orifice area control range of annular flow. In the future, the presented findings may provide guidance for the design of effective injectors to be used in throttleable engines.๋ฏผ๊ฐ„ ์ฃผ๋„์˜ ์šฐ์ฃผ ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์ฒด ์‹œ์žฅ ์„ฑ์žฅ๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ดˆ์†Œํ˜• ์œ„์„ฑ ์‹œ์žฅ์ด ์ปค์ง์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ƒ์—… ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ ์„œ๋น„์Šค ์‹œ์žฅ ๊ฒฝ์Ÿ์ด ์น˜์—ดํ•ด์ง€๋ฉด์„œ ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ ๋น„์šฉ์„ ๋‚ฎ์ถ”๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ฐจ์„ธ๋Œ€ ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์ฒด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ด ํ™œ๋ฐœํžˆ ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์žฌ์‚ฌ์šฉ ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์ฒด๋Š” ์ €๋น„์šฉ ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ ์ž„๋ฌด๋ฅผ ์‹คํ˜„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ค‘์š” ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋กœ, ์ง€์ƒ ๋˜๋Š” ํ•ด์ƒ ์ฐฉ๋ฅ™ ์‹œ ์—”์ง„ ํšŒ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ ๋žœ๋”ฉ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์—ฌ๊ฒจ์ง„๋‹ค. ์†Œํ”„ํŠธ ๋žœ๋”ฉ์€ ๋ฐœ์‚ฌ์ฒด ์—”์ง„์˜ ์ถ”๋ ฅ์„ ์กฐ์ ˆํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์‹คํ˜„ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ช‡ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋“ค ์ค‘ ์ถ”์ง„์ œ ์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค ๋ฉด์  ์ œ์–ด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์‹์ด ์‹ ๋ขฐ์„ฑ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์—ฌ๊ฒจ์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•€ํ‹€ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๋ฉด์  ์กฐ์ ˆ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ์ถ”๋ ฅ ์ œ์–ด ๋ฐฉ์‹์˜ ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์  ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ฏธ๊ตญ TRW ์‚ฌ์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ณ ์•ˆ๋œ ํ›„, 2000๋…„๋Œ€ ์ดˆ๋ฐ˜๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ตญ๋‚ด์™ธ์—์„œ ํ•€ํ‹€ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ ๋ฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ๊ณต๊ฐœ๋œ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ๋ฐ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ํ•œ์ •์ ์ด๋ฉฐ ์ œํ•œ์ ์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์„ค๊ณ„์— ์žˆ์–ด ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์ด ์กด์žฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, ํ•€ํ‹€ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๊ธฐ๋Š” ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ํ˜•์ƒ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ด์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ค‘์š” ํ˜•์ƒ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค๊ณผ ๋ถ„๋ฌด ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ํ•€ํ‹€ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ถ„๋ฌด ํŠน์„ฑ์€ ์—ฐ์†Œ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ด€๋ จ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ˆ˜๋ฅ˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ํ•€ํ‹€ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ์ตœ์  ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฒ ์ด์Šค ๋งˆ๋ จ์„ ์œ„ํ•ด 5:1์˜ ์ถ”๋ ฅ๋น„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ์†Œํ˜• ์•ก์ฒด๋กœ์ผ“์—”์ง„์šฉ ํ•€ํ‹€ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๊ธฐ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์œ ์ฒด๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋ถ„๋ฌดํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‚ด๋ถ€ ์œ ๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ถ”๋ ฅ์ด ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ๊ตฌ๋™ ์žฅ์น˜์˜ ์ถ• ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ๋™์‹ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํ˜•์ƒ ์ผ€์ด์Šค๋ฅผ ๊ณ ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์น˜ํ•ด์„ ๋ฐ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ตœ์  ํ˜•์ƒ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๋ชจ์ƒ‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ดํ›„ annular flow์˜ ์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค ๋ฉด์  ์กฐ์ ˆ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์ธ์ž์ธ gap distance (G)๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”๊ฟ”๊ฐ€๋ฉฐ ๋ถ„๋ฌด ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณด์•˜๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๋™์ผ ์ถ”๋ ฅ ๋ ˆ๋ฒจ์—์„œ G๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, annular flow์˜ ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ปค์ง€๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ถ„๋ฌด๊ฐ์€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. G๊ฐ€ ๊ณ ์ •๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ์ถ”๋ ฅ ๋ ˆ๋ฒจ์ด ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋”๋ผ๊ณ  ๋ถ„๋ฌด๊ฐ์€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์ผ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์•ก์  ์ง๊ฒฝ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋„ G๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•จ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ž‘์•„์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. SMD์™€ ๋ถ„์—ด๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋ฌด์ฐจ์›์ˆ˜์ธ We ๋ฐ J์™€์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์‚ดํŽด๋ณธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ํ•€ํ‹€ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฏธ๋ฆฝํ™” ๊ณผ์ •์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ํ•€ํ‹€ ๋ ๋‹จ์—์„œ radial flow์™€ annular flow๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜์ง ์ถฉ๋Œ ์‹œ ๋‘ ์œ ์ฒด์˜ ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ์ฐจ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์•ก๋ง‰ ๋ถ„์—ด๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๋‘ ์œ ์ฒด ํ‘œ๋ฉด์—์„œ์˜ ์ „๋‹จ๋ ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ์ถ”๊ฐ€ ๋ถ„์—ด์ด ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„๋ฌด๊ฐ ๋ฐ SMD์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์‹คํ—˜์‹์„ ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ „ ์ถ”๋ ฅ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์—์„œ ํŠน์ • SMD๋ฅผ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ G์˜ ์ œ์–ด ๋ฒ”์œ„๋ฅผ ๋„์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ•€ํ‹€ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ค‘์š” ํ˜•์ƒ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜์ธ skip distance์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋„ ์ˆ˜๋ฅ˜ ์‹คํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , skip distance์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ถ„๋ฌด๊ฐ ๋ฐ SMD๊ฐ€ ๋น„๋ก€ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Annular flow๊ฐ€ ํ•€ํ‹€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด์„ ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ด๋™ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๋งˆ์ฐฐ ๋ฐ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์™€์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์œ ์†์ด ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๊ณ  ์ด์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰ ์†์‹ค๋ฅ  ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ๋“ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. Skip distance์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ถ„๋ฌด ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ณ€ํ™”์œจ์€ ์ € ์ถ”๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ปค์กŒ๊ณ , ํŠนํžˆ 20% ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ํญ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ข€ ๋” ์ž์„ธํžˆ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ•€ํ‹€ ํ‘œ๋ฉด ๋ถ€๊ทผ์—์„œ annular flow์˜ ์ถ• ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ ์†๋„ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์น˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ „ ์ถ”๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค ์ถœ๊ตฌ ์‹œ์ž‘์ ์œผ๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ผ์ • ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ๊นŒ์ง€ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ์ผ์ •ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์œ ์ง€๋˜๋Š” potential core์™€ ์†๋„ ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ์ด ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๋Š” developed region์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ, 20% ์ถ”๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ potential core ์˜์—ญ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์งง์•˜๊ณ  ์ตœ๋Œ€ ์†๋„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์œจ๋„ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ด๋กœ ์ธํ•ด 20% ์ถ”๋ ฅ ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๋ถ„๋ฌด๊ฐ๊ณผ SMD๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. Skip distance์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์†๋„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์œจ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ถ„๋ฌด๊ฐ ๋ฐ SMD ๋ณ€ํ™”์œจ์„ ์–ป์—ˆ๊ณ , ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ๊ฐ ์ถ”๋ ฅ ๋ ˆ๋ฒจ๊ฐ„์˜ ํ‘œ์ค€ ํŽธ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ skip distance๊ฐ€ ์ œ์•ˆ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ํ•€ํ‹€ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๊ธฐ ์„ค๊ณ„ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ๊ณ ๋ ค๋ผ์•ผ ํ•  ์ฃผ์š” ํ˜•์ƒ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ํ™•๋ณดํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” skip distance์™€ ๋ถ„๋ฌด ํŠน์„ฑ๊ณผ์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ดํ•ดํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, annular flow์˜ ์˜ค๋ฆฌํ”ผ์Šค ๋ฉด์  ์ œ์–ด ๋ฒ”์œ„ ์„ค์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ฐธ๊ณ  ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ์„œ ๋ถ„๋ฌด ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ถ”๋ ฅ ์ œ์–ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ ์„ค๊ณ„์— ํ™œ์šฉ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค. ํ–ฅํ›„ ๊ฐ€๋ณ€์ถ”๋ ฅ์šฉ ์—”์ง„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๋ถ„์‚ฌ๊ธฐ ์„ค๊ณ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž๋ฃŒ๋กœ์„œ ์ด์šฉ๋  ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2 DESIGN OF PINTLE INJECTOR 8 2.1 Specifications and Basic Parameters 8 2.2 Design of Radial Flow Passage 13 2.3 Design of Annular Flow Passage 19 CHAPTER 3 EXPERIMENTAL METHODS AND SETUPS 24 3.1 Spray Imaging 24 3.2 Droplet Size (SMD) 25 3.3 Spray Pattern 27 CHAPTER 4 EFFECTS OF GAP DISTANCE ON SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS 31 4.1 Objectives 31 4.2 Experimental Conditions 31 4.3 Results and Discussion 34 4.3.1 Spray Structure 34 4.3.2 Droplet Size (SMD) 42 4.3.3 Spray Uniformity 46 4.3.4 Relationship between Spray Angle and SMD 50 4.3.5 Variations in Gap Distance and Spray Angle with SMD 51 CHAPTER 5 SPRAY CHARATERISCIS WITH SKIP DISTANCE 54 5.1 Background and Objectives 54 5.2 Experimental Conditions 57 5.3 Numerical Conditions and Setups 59 5.4 Results and Discussion 60 5.4.1 Spray Angle 60 5.4.2 Droplet Size (SMD) 63 5.4.3 Distribution of Gas Velocity 65 5.4.4 Correlations of Spray Characteristics with Decay Rate 74 5.4.5 Trends of Average Spray Angle and SMD with Standard Deviation 79 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION 81 REFERENCES 84 ABSTRACT IN KOREAN 92Docto

    Main Chamber and Preburner Injector Technology

    Get PDF
    This document reports the experimental and analytical research carried out at the Penn State Propulsion Engineering Research Center in support of NASA's plan to develop advanced technologies for future single stage to orbit (SSTO) propulsion systems. The focus of the work is on understanding specific technical issues related to bi-propellant and tri-propellant thrusters. The experiments concentrate on both cold flow demonstrations and hot-fire uni-element tests to demonstrate concepts that can be incorporated into hardware design and development. The analysis is CFD-based and is intended to support the design and interpretation of the experiments and to extrapolate findings to full-scale designs. The research is divided into five main categories that impact various SSTO development scenarios. The first category focuses on RP-1/gaseous hydrogen (GH2)/gaseous oxygen (GO2) tri-propellant combustion with specific emphasis on understanding the benefits of hydrogen addition to RP-1/oxygen combustion and in developing innovative injector technology. The second category investigates liquid oxygen (LOX)/GH2 combustion at main chamber near stoichiometric conditions to improve understanding of existing LOX/GH2 rocket systems. The third and fourth categories investigate the technical issues related with oxidizer-rich and fuel-rich propulsive concepts, issues that are necessary for developing the full-flow engine cycle. Here, injector technology issues for both LOX/GH2 and LOX/RP-1 propellants are examined. The last category, also related to the full-flow engine cycle, examines injector technology needs for GO2/GH2 propellant combustion at near-stoichiometric conditions for main chamber application

    NASA Propulsion Engineering Research Center, Volume 2

    Get PDF
    This is the second volume in the 1994 annual report for the NASA Propulsion Engineering Research Center's Sixth Annual Symposium. This conference covered: (1) Combustors and Nozzles; (2) Turbomachinery Aero- and Hydro-dynamics; (3) On-board Propulsion systems; (4) Advanced Propulsion Applications; (5) Vaporization and Combustion; (6) Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics; and (7) Atomization and Sprays

    Fifth International Symposium on Liquid Space Propulsion

    Get PDF
    Contents include the fiollowing: Theme: Life-life Combustion Devices Technology. Technical Sessions: International Perspectives. System Level Effects. Component Level Processes. Material Considerations. Design Environments -- Predictions. Injector Design Technology. Design Environments -- Measurements. Panel Discussion: Views on future research and development needs and Symposium observations. Aquarium Welcome and Southern Belle Riverboat Recognition Banquet evening events

    NASA patent abstracts bibliography: A continuing bibliography. Section 2: Indexes (supplement 13)

    Get PDF
    This issue of the Index Section contains entries for 3386 patent and application for patent citations covering the period May 1969 through June 1978. The Index Section contains five indexes --- subject, inventor, source, number, and accession number

    NASA patent abstracts bibliography: A continuing bibliography. Section 2: Indexes (supplement 10)

    Get PDF
    Abstracts for 3089 patents and applications for patent entered in the NASA scientific and information system for the period covering May 1969 through December 1976 are indexed by subject, inventor, source, NASA case or U.S. patent number, and accession number in the NASA system
    corecore