Fixed points avoiding Abelian kk-powers

We show that the problem of whether the fixed point of a morphism avoids Abelian $k$-powers is decidable under rather general condition

Every Binary Pattern of Length Greater Than 14 Is Abelian-2-Avoidable

We show that every binary pattern of length greater than 14 is abelian-2-avoidable. The best known upper bound on the length of abelian-2-unavoidable binary pattern was 118, and the best known lower bound is 7. We designed an algorithm to decide, under some reasonable assumptions, if a morphic word avoids a pattern in the abelian sense. This algorithm is then used to show that some binary patterns are abelian-2-avoidable. We finally use this list of abelian-2-avoidable pattern to show our result. We also discuss the avoidability of binary patterns on 3 and 4 letters

Relations on words

In the first part of this survey, we present classical notions arising in combinatorics on words: growth function of a language, complexity function of an infinite word, pattern avoidance, periodicity and uniform recurrence. Our presentation tries to set up a unified framework with respect to a given binary relation. In the second part, we mainly focus on abelian equivalence, $k$-abelian equivalence, combinatorial coefficients and associated relations, Parikh matrices and $M$-equivalence. In particular, some new refinements of abelian equivalence are introduced

Templates for the k-binomial complexity of the Tribonacci word

Consider k-binomial equivalence: two finite words are equivalent if they share the same subwords of length at most k with the same multiplicities. With this relation, the k-binomial complexity of an infinite word x maps the integer n to the number of pairwise non-equivalent factors of length n occurring in x. In this paper based on the notion of template introduced by Currie et al., we show that, for all k≥2, the k-binomial complexity of the Tribonacci word coincides with its usual factor complexity p(n)=2n+1. A similar result was already known for Sturmian words, but the proof relies on completely different techniques that seemingly could not be applied for Tribonacci. © 2019 Elsevier Inc

Deciding Properties of Automatic Sequences

In this thesis, we show that several natural questions about automatic sequences can be expressed as logical predicates and then decided mechanically. We extend known results in this area to broader classes of sequences (e.g., paperfolding words), introduce new operations that extend the space of possible queries, and show how to process the results. We begin with the fundamental concepts and problems related to automatic sequences, and the corresponding numeration systems. Building on that foundation, we discuss the general logical framework that formalizes the questions we can mechanically answer. We start with a first-order logical theory, and then extend it with additional predicates and operations. Then we explain a slightly different technique that works on a monadic second- order theory, but show that it is ultimately subsumed by an extension of the first-order theory. Next, we give two applications: critical exponent and paperfolding words. In the critical exponent example, we mechanically construct an automaton that describes a set of rational numbers related to a given automatic sequence. Then we give a polynomial-time algorithm to compute the supremum of this rational set, allowing us to compute the critical exponent and many similar quantities. In the paperfolding example, we extend our mechanical procedure to the paperfolding words, an uncountably infinite collection of infinite words. In the following chapter, we address abelian and additive problems on automatic sequences. We give an example of a natural predicate which is provably inexpressible in our first-order theory, and discuss alternate methods for solving abelian and additive problems on automatic sequences. We close with a chapter of open problems, drawn from the earlier chapters