Normalization for Fitch-Style Modal Calculi

Fitch-style modal lambda calculi enable programming with necessity modalities in a typed lambda calculus by extending the typing context with a delimiting operator that is denoted by a lock. The addition of locks simplifies the formulation of typing rules for calculi that incorporate different modal axioms, but each variant demands different, tedious and seemingly ad hoc syntactic lemmas to prove normalization. In this work, we take a semantic approach to normalization, called normalization by evaluation (NbE), by leveraging the possible-world semantics of Fitch-style calculi to yield a more modular approach to normalization. We show that NbE models can be constructed for calculi that incorporate the K, T and 4 axioms of modal logic, as suitable instantiations of the possible-world semantics. In addition to existing results that handle beta-equivalence, our normalization result also considers eta-equivalence for these calculi. Our key results have been mechanized in the proof assistant Agda. Finally, we showcase several consequences of normalization for proving meta-theoretic properties of Fitch-style calculi as well as programming-language applications based on different interpretations of the necessity modality

Modular Normalization with Types

With the increasing use of software in today’s digital world, software is becoming more and more complex and the cost of developing and maintaining software has skyrocketed. It has become pressing to develop software using effective tools that reduce this cost. Programming language research aims to develop such tools using mathematically rigorous foundations. A recurring and central concept in programming language research is normalization: the process of transforming a complex expression in a language to a canonical form while preserving its meaning. Normalization has compelling benefits in theory and practice, but is extremely difficult to achieve. Several program transformations that are used to optimise programs, prove properties of languages and check program equivalence, for instance, are after all instances of normalization, but they are seldom viewed as such.Viewed through the lens of current methods, normalization lacks the ability to be broken into sub-problems and solved independently, i.e., lacks modularity. To make matters worse, such methods rely excessively on the syntax of the language, making the resulting normalization algorithms brittle and sensitive to changes in the syntax. When the syntax of the language evolves due to modification or extension, as it almost always does in practice, the normalization algorithm may need to be revisited entirely. To circumvent these problems, normalization is currently either abandoned entirely or concrete instances of normalization are achieved using ad hoc means specific to a particular language. Continuing this trend in programming language research poses the risk of building on a weak foundation where languages either lack fundamental properties that follow from normalization or several concrete instances end up repeated in an ad hoc manner that lacks reusability.This thesis advocates for the use of type-directed Normalization by Evaluation (NbE) to develop normalization algorithms. NbE is a technique that provides an opportunity for a modular implementation of normalization algorithms by allowing us to disentangle the syntax of a language from its semantics. Types further this opportunity by allowing us to dissect a language into isolated fragments, such as functions and products, with an individual specification of syntax and semantics. To illustrate type-directed NbE in context, we develop NbE algorithms and show their applicability for typed programming language calculi in three different domains (modal types, static information-flow control and categorical combinators) and for a family of embedded-domain specific languages in Haskell

Polymorphic Context for Contextual Modality

Through the Curry-Howard isomorphism between logics and calculi, necessity modality in logic is interpreted as types representing program code. Particularly, \lamcirc, which was proposed in influential work by Davies, and its successors have been widely used as a logical foundation for syntactic meta-programming. However, it is less known how to extend calculi based on modal type theory to handle more practical operations including manipulation of variable binding structures. This paper constructs such a modal type theory in two steps. First, we reconstruct contextual modal type theory by Nanevski, et al.\ as a Fitch-style system, which introduces hypothetical judgment with hierarchical context. The resulting type theory, \multilayer contextual modal type theory \fcmtt, is generalized to accommodate not only S4 but also K, T, and K4 modalities, and proven to enjoy many desired properties. Second, we extend \fcmtt with polymorphic context, which is an internalization of contextual weakening, to obtain a novel modal type theory \envpoly. Despite the fact that it came from observation in logic, polymorphic context allows both binding manipulation and hygienic code generation. We claim this by showing a sound translation from \lamcirc to \envpoly

Modal dependent type theory and dependent right adjoints

In recent years we have seen several new models of dependent type theory extended with some form of modal necessity operator, including nominal type theory, guarded and clocked type theory, and spatial and cohesive type theory. In this paper we study modal dependent type theory: dependent type theory with an operator satisfying (a dependent version of) the K-axiom of modal logic. We investigate both semantics and syntax. For the semantics, we introduce categories with families with a dependent right adjoint (CwDRA) and show that the examples above can be presented as such. Indeed, we show that any finite limit category with an adjunction of endofunctors gives rise to a CwDRA via the local universe construction. For the syntax, we introduce a dependently typed extension of Fitch-style modal lambda-calculus, show that it can be interpreted in any CwDRA, and build a term model. We extend the syntax and semantics with universes

Modal dependent type theory and dependent right adjoints

In recent years we have seen several new models of dependent type theory extended with some form of modal necessity operator, including nominal type theory, guarded and clocked type theory, and spatial and cohesive type theory. In this paper we study modal dependent type theory: dependent type theory with an operator satisfying (a dependent version of) the K-axiom of modal logic. We investigate both semantics and syntax. For the semantics, we introduce categories with families with a dependent right adjoint (CwDRA) and show that the examples above can be presented as such. Indeed, we show that any finite limit category with an adjunction of endofunctors gives rise to a CwDRA via the local universe construction. For the syntax, we introduce a dependently typed extension of Fitch-style modal lambda-calculus, show that it can be interpreted in any CwDRA, and build a term model. We extend the syntax and semantics with universes

A Categorical Normalization Proof for the Modal Lambda-Calculus

We investigate a simply typed modal $\lambda$-calculus, $\lambda^{\to\square}$, due to Pfenning, Wong and Davies, where we define a well-typed term with respect to a context stack that captures the possible world semantics in a syntactic way. It provides logical foundation for multi-staged meta-programming. Our main contribution in this paper is a normalization by evaluation (NbE) algorithm for $\lambda^{\to\square}$ which we prove sound and complete. The NbE algorithm is a moderate extension to the standard presheaf model of simply typed $\lambda$-calculus. However, central to the model construction and the NbE algorithm is the observation of Kripke-style substitutions on context stacks which brings together two previously separate concepts, structural modal transformations on context stacks and substitutions for individual assumptions. Moreover, Kripke-style substitutions allow us to give a formulation for contextual types, which can represent open code in a meta-programming setting. Our work lays the foundation for extending the logical foundation by Pfenning, Wong, and Davies towards building a practical, dependently typed foundation for meta-programming