First-order logic learning in artificial neural networks

Artificial Neural Networks have previously been applied in neuro-symbolic learning to learn ground logic program rules. However, there are few results of learning relations using neuro-symbolic learning. This paper presents the system PAN, which can learn relations. The inputs to PAN are one or more atoms, representing the conditions of a logic rule, and the output is the conclusion of the rule. The symbolic inputs may include functional terms of arbitrary depth and arity, and the output may include terms constructed from the input functors. Symbolic inputs are encoded as an integer using an invertible encoding function, which is used in reverse to extract the output terms. The main advance of this system is a convention to allow construction of Artificial Neural Networks able to learn rules with the same power of expression as first order definite clauses. The system is tested on three examples and the results are discussed

Discovering logical knowledge in non-symbolic domains

Deep learning and symbolic artificial intelligence remain the two main paradigms in Artificial Intelligence (AI), each presenting their own strengths and weaknesses. Artificial agents should integrate both of these aspects of AI in order to show general intelligence and solve complex problems in real-world scenarios; similarly to how humans use both the analytical left side and the intuitive right side of their brain in their lives. However, one of the main obstacles hindering this integration is the Symbol Grounding Problem [144], which is the capacity to map physical world observations to a set of symbols. In this thesis, we combine symbolic reasoning and deep learning in order to better represent and reason with abstract knowledge. In particular, we focus on solving non-symbolic-state Reinforcement Learning environments using a symbolic logical domain. We consider different configurations: (i) unknown knowledge of both the symbol grounding function and the symbolic logical domain, (ii) unknown knowledge of the symbol grounding function and prior knowledge of the domain, (iii) imperfect knowledge of the symbols grounding function and unknown knowledge of the domain. We develop algorithms and neural network architectures that are general enough to be applied to different kinds of environments, which we test on both continuous-state control problems and image-based environments. Specifically, we develop two kinds of architectures: one for Markovian RL tasks and one for non-Markovian RL domains. The first is based on model-based RL and representation learning, and is inspired by the substantial prior work in state abstraction for RL [115]. The second is mainly based on recurrent neural networks and continuous relaxations of temporal logic domains. In particular, the first approach extracts a symbolic STRIPS-like abstraction for control problems. For the second approach, we explore connections between recurrent neural networks and finite state machines, and we define Visual Reward Machines, an extension to non-symbolic domains of Reward Machines [27], which are a popular approach to non-Markovian RL tasks

Dimensions of Neural-symbolic Integration - A Structured Survey

Research on integrated neural-symbolic systems has made significant progress in the recent past. In particular the understanding of ways to deal with symbolic knowledge within connectionist systems (also called artificial neural networks) has reached a critical mass which enables the community to strive for applicable implementations and use cases. Recent work has covered a great variety of logics used in artificial intelligence and provides a multitude of techniques for dealing with them within the context of artificial neural networks. We present a comprehensive survey of the field of neural-symbolic integration, including a new classification of system according to their architectures and abilities.Comment: 28 page

The Integration of Connectionism and First-Order Knowledge Representation and Reasoning as a Challenge for Artificial Intelligence

Intelligent systems based on first-order logic on the one hand, and on artificial neural networks (also called connectionist systems) on the other, differ substantially. It would be very desirable to combine the robust neural networking machinery with symbolic knowledge representation and reasoning paradigms like logic programming in such a way that the strengths of either paradigm will be retained. Current state-of-the-art research, however, fails by far to achieve this ultimate goal. As one of the main obstacles to be overcome we perceive the question how symbolic knowledge can be encoded by means of connectionist systems: Satisfactory answers to this will naturally lead the way to knowledge extraction algorithms and to integrated neural-symbolic systems.Comment: In Proceedings of INFORMATION'2004, Tokyo, Japan, to appear. 12 page

Neurons and symbols: a manifesto

We discuss the purpose of neural-symbolic integration including its principles, mechanisms and applications. We outline a cognitive computational model for neural-symbolic integration, position the model in the broader context of multi-agent systems, machine learning and automated reasoning, and list some of the challenges for the area of neural-symbolic computation to achieve the promise of effective integration of robust learning and expressive reasoning under uncertainty