8,093 research outputs found
Modal logic with non-deterministic semantics: Part I—Propositional case
Dugundji proved in 1940 that most parts of standard modal systems cannot be characterized by a single finite deterministic matrix. In the eighties, Ivlev proposed a semantics of four-valued non-deterministic matrices (which he called quasi-matrices), in order to characterize a hierarchy of weak modal logics without the necessitation rule. In a previous paper, we extended some systems of Ivlev’s hierarchy, also proposing weaker six-valued systems in which the (T) axiom was replaced by the deontic (D) axiom. In this paper, we propose even weaker systems, by eliminating both axioms, which are characterized by eight-valued non-deterministic matrices. In addition, we prove completeness for those new systems. It is natural to ask if a characterization by finite ordinary (deterministic) logical matrices would be possible for all those Ivlev-like systems. We will show that finite deterministic matrices do not characterize any of them
Generic Trace Semantics via Coinduction
Trace semantics has been defined for various kinds of state-based systems,
notably with different forms of branching such as non-determinism vs.
probability. In this paper we claim to identify one underlying mathematical
structure behind these "trace semantics," namely coinduction in a Kleisli
category. This claim is based on our technical result that, under a suitably
order-enriched setting, a final coalgebra in a Kleisli category is given by an
initial algebra in the category Sets. Formerly the theory of coalgebras has
been employed mostly in Sets where coinduction yields a finer process semantics
of bisimilarity. Therefore this paper extends the application field of
coalgebras, providing a new instance of the principle "process semantics via
coinduction."Comment: To appear in Logical Methods in Computer Science. 36 page
Swap structures semantics for Ivlev-like modal logics
In 1988, J. Ivlev proposed some (non-normal) modal systems which are semantically characterized by four-valued non-deterministic matrices in the sense of A. Avron and I. Lev. Swap structures are multialgebras (a.k.a. hyperalgebras) of a special kind, which were introduced in 2016 by W. Carnielli and M. Coniglio in order to give a non-deterministic semantical account for several paraconsistent logics known as logics of formal inconsistency, which are not algebraizable by means of the standard techniques. Each swap structure induces naturally a non-deterministic matrix. The aim of this paper is to obtain a swap structures semantics for some Ivlev-like modal systems proposed in 2015 by M. Coniglio, L. Fariñas del Cerro and N. Peron. Completeness results will be stated by means of the notion of Lindenbaum–Tarski swap structures, which constitute a natural generalization to multialgebras of the concept of Lindenbaum–Tarski algebras
Refinement for Transition Systems with Responses
Motivated by the response pattern for property specifications and
applications within flexible workflow management systems, we report upon an
initial study of modal and mixed transition systems in which the must
transitions are interpreted as must eventually, and in which implementations
can contain may behaviors that are resolved at run-time. We propose Transition
Systems with Responses (TSRs) as a suitable model for this study. We prove that
TSRs correspond to a restricted class of mixed transition systems, which we
refer to as the action-deterministic mixed transition systems. We show that
TSRs allow for a natural definition of deadlocked and accepting states. We then
transfer the standard definition of refinement for mixed transition systems to
TSRs and prove that refinement does not preserve deadlock freedom. This leads
to the proposal of safe refinements, which are those that preserve deadlock
freedom. We exemplify the use of TSRs and (safe) refinements on a small
medication workflow.Comment: In Proceedings FIT 2012, arXiv:1207.348
Modal logics are coalgebraic
Applications of modal logics are abundant in computer science, and a large number of structurally different modal logics have been successfully employed in a diverse spectrum of application contexts. Coalgebraic semantics, on the other hand, provides a uniform and encompassing view on the large variety of specific logics used in particular domains. The coalgebraic approach is generic and compositional: tools and techniques simultaneously apply to a large class of application areas and can moreover be combined in a modular way. In particular, this facilitates a pick-and-choose approach to domain specific formalisms, applicable across the entire scope of application areas, leading to generic software tools that are easier to design, to implement, and to maintain. This paper substantiates the authors' firm belief that the systematic exploitation of the coalgebraic nature of modal logic will not only have impact on the field of modal logic itself but also lead to significant progress in a number of areas within computer science, such as knowledge representation and concurrency/mobility
Linear Time Logics - A Coalgebraic Perspective
We describe a general approach to deriving linear time logics for a wide
variety of state-based, quantitative systems, by modelling the latter as
coalgebras whose type incorporates both branching behaviour and linear
behaviour. Concretely, we define logics whose syntax is determined by the
choice of linear behaviour and whose domain of truth values is determined by
the choice of branching, and we provide two equivalent semantics for them: a
step-wise semantics amenable to automata-based verification, and a path-based
semantics akin to those of standard linear time logics. We also provide a
semantic characterisation of the associated notion of logical equivalence, and
relate it to previously-defined maximal trace semantics for such systems.
Instances of our logics support reasoning about the possibility, likelihood or
minimal cost of exhibiting a given linear time property. We conclude with a
generalisation of the logics, dual in spirit to logics with discounting, which
increases their practical appeal in the context of resource-aware computation
by incorporating a notion of offsetting.Comment: Major revision of previous version: Sections 4 and 5 generalise the
results in the previous version, with new proofs; Section 6 contains new
result
A Logic for Non-Deterministic Parallel Abstract State Machines
We develop a logic which enables reasoning about single steps of
non-deterministic parallel Abstract State Machines (ASMs). Our logic builds
upon the unifying logic introduced by Nanchen and St\"ark for reasoning about
hierarchical (parallel) ASMs. Our main contribution to this regard is the
handling of non-determinism (both bounded and unbounded) within the logical
formalism. Moreover, we do this without sacrificing the completeness of the
logic for statements about single steps of non-deterministic parallel ASMs,
such as invariants of rules, consistency conditions for rules, or step-by-step
equivalence of rules.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1602.0748
Computing Distances between Probabilistic Automata
We present relaxed notions of simulation and bisimulation on Probabilistic
Automata (PA), that allow some error epsilon. When epsilon is zero we retrieve
the usual notions of bisimulation and simulation on PAs. We give logical
characterisations of these notions by choosing suitable logics which differ
from the elementary ones, L with negation and L without negation, by the modal
operator. Using flow networks, we show how to compute the relations in PTIME.
This allows the definition of an efficiently computable non-discounted distance
between the states of a PA. A natural modification of this distance is
introduced, to obtain a discounted distance, which weakens the influence of
long term transitions. We compare our notions of distance to others previously
defined and illustrate our approach on various examples. We also show that our
distance is not expansive with respect to process algebra operators. Although L
without negation is a suitable logic to characterise epsilon-(bi)simulation on
deterministic PAs, it is not for general PAs; interestingly, we prove that it
does characterise weaker notions, called a priori epsilon-(bi)simulation, which
we prove to be NP-difficult to decide.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2011, arXiv:1107.074
- …