3 research outputs found
Finding Academic Experts on a MultiSensor Approach using Shannon's Entropy
Expert finding is an information retrieval task concerned with the search for
the most knowledgeable people, in some topic, with basis on documents
describing peoples activities. The task involves taking a user query as input
and returning a list of people sorted by their level of expertise regarding the
user query. This paper introduces a novel approach for combining multiple
estimators of expertise based on a multisensor data fusion framework together
with the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and Shannon's entropy. More
specifically, we defined three sensors which detect heterogeneous information
derived from the textual contents, from the graph structure of the citation
patterns for the community of experts, and from profile information about the
academic experts. Given the evidences collected, each sensor may define
different candidates as experts and consequently do not agree in a final
ranking decision. To deal with these conflicts, we applied the Dempster-Shafer
theory of evidence combined with Shannon's Entropy formula to fuse this
information and come up with a more accurate and reliable final ranking list.
Experiments made over two datasets of academic publications from the Computer
Science domain attest for the adequacy of the proposed approach over the
traditional state of the art approaches. We also made experiments against
representative supervised state of the art algorithms. Results revealed that
the proposed method achieved a similar performance when compared to these
supervised techniques, confirming the capabilities of the proposed framework
Modeling Scholar Profile in Expert Recommendation based on Multi-Layered Bibliographic Graph
A recommendation system requires the profile of researchers which called here as Scholar Profile for suggestions based on expertise. This dissertation contributes on modeling unbiased scholar profile for more objective expertise evidence that consider interest changes and less focused on citations. Interest changes lead to diverse topics and make the expertise levels on topics differ. Scholar profile is expected to capture expertise in terms of productivity aspect which often signified from the volume of publications and citations. We include researcher behavior in publishing articles to avoid misleading citation. Therefore, the expertise levels of researchers on topics is influenced by interest evolution, productivity, dynamicity, and behavior extracted from bibliographic data of published scholarly articles. As this dissertation output, the scholar profile model employed within a recommendation system for recommending productive researchers who provide academic guidance. The scholar profile is generated from multi layers of bibliographic data, such as layers of author, topic, and relations between those layers to represent academic social network. There is no predefined information of topics in a cold-start situation, such that procedures of topic mapping are necessary. Then, features of productivity, dynamicity and behavior of researchers within those layers are taken from some observed years to accommodate the behavior aspect. We experimented with AMiner dataset often used in the following bibliographic data related studies to empirically investigate: (a) topic mapping strategies to obtain interest of researchers, (b) feature extraction model for productivity, dynamicity, and behavior aspects based on the mapped topics, and (c) expertise rank that considers interest changes and less focused on citations from the scholar profile. Ensuring the validity results, our experiments worked on standard expert list of AMiner researchers. We selected Natural Language Processing and Information Extraction (NLP-IE) domains because of their familiarity and interrelated context to make it easier for introducing cases of interest changes. Using the mapped topics, we also made minor contributions on transformation procedures for visualizing researchers on maps of Scopus subjects and investigating the possibilities of conflict of interest
Information technologies for pain management
Millions of people around the world suffer from pain, acute or chronic and this raises the
importance of its screening, assessment and treatment. The importance of pain is attested by
the fact that it is considered the fifth vital sign for indicating basic bodily functions, health
and quality of life, together with the four other vital signs: blood pressure, body
temperature, pulse rate and respiratory rate. However, while these four signals represent an
objective physical parameter, the occurrence of pain expresses an emotional status that
happens inside the mind of each individual and therefore, is highly subjective that makes
difficult its management and evaluation. For this reason, the self-report of pain is considered
the most accurate pain assessment method wherein patients should be asked to periodically
rate their pain severity and related symptoms. Thus, in the last years computerised systems
based on mobile and web technologies are becoming increasingly used to enable patients to
report their pain which lead to the development of electronic pain diaries (ED). This approach
may provide to health care professionals (HCP) and patients the ability to interact with the
system anywhere and at anytime thoroughly changes the coordinates of time and place and
offers invaluable opportunities to the healthcare delivery. However, most of these systems
were designed to interact directly to patients without presence of a healthcare professional
or without evidence of reliability and accuracy. In fact, the observation of the existing
systems revealed lack of integration with mobile devices, limited use of web-based interfaces
and reduced interaction with patients in terms of obtaining and viewing information. In
addition, the reliability and accuracy of computerised systems for pain management are
rarely proved or their effects on HCP and patients outcomes remain understudied.
This thesis is focused on technology for pain management and aims to propose a monitoring
system which includes ubiquitous interfaces specifically oriented to either patients or HCP
using mobile devices and Internet so as to allow decisions based on the knowledge obtained
from the analysis of the collected data. With the interoperability and cloud computing
technologies in mind this system uses web services (WS) to manage data which are stored in a
Personal Health Record (PHR).
A Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) was implemented so as to determine the effectiveness
of the proposed computerised monitoring system. The six weeks RCT evidenced the
advantages provided by the ubiquitous access to HCP and patients so as to they were able to
interact with the system anywhere and at anytime using WS to send and receive data. In
addition, the collected data were stored in a PHR which offers integrity and security as well
as permanent on line accessibility to both patients and HCP. The study evidenced not only
that the majority of participants recommend the system, but also that they recognize it
suitability for pain management without the requirement of advanced skills or experienced users. Furthermore, the system enabled the definition and management of patient-oriented
treatments with reduced therapist time. The study also revealed that the guidance of HCP at
the beginning of the monitoring is crucial to patients' satisfaction and experience stemming
from the usage of the system as evidenced by the high correlation between the
recommendation of the application, and it suitability to improve pain management and to
provide medical information. There were no significant differences regarding to
improvements in the quality of pain treatment between intervention group and control group.
Based on the data collected during the RCT a clinical decision support system (CDSS) was
developed so as to offer capabilities of tailored alarms, reports, and clinical guidance. This
CDSS, called Patient Oriented Method of Pain Evaluation System (POMPES), is based on the
combination of several statistical models (one-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis and Tukey-Kramer)
with an imputation model based on linear regression. This system resulted in fully accuracy
related to decisions suggested by the system compared with the medical diagnosis, and
therefore, revealed it suitability to manage the pain. At last, based on the aerospace systems
capability to deal with different complex data sources with varied complexities and
accuracies, an innovative model was proposed. This model is characterized by a qualitative
analysis stemming from the data fusion method combined with a quantitative model based on
the comparison of the standard deviation together with the values of mathematical
expectations. This model aimed to compare the effects of technological and pen-and-paper
systems when applied to different dimension of pain, such as: pain intensity, anxiety,
catastrophizing, depression, disability and interference. It was observed that pen-and-paper
and technology produced equivalent effects in anxiety, depression, interference and pain
intensity. On the contrary, technology evidenced favourable effects in terms of
catastrophizing and disability. The proposed method revealed to be suitable, intelligible, easy
to implement and low time and resources consuming. Further work is needed to evaluate the
proposed system to follow up participants for longer periods of time which includes a
complementary RCT encompassing patients with chronic pain symptoms. Finally, additional
studies should be addressed to determine the economic effects not only to patients but also
to the healthcare system