Faster Online Elastic Degenerate String Matching

An Elastic-Degenerate String [Iliopoulus et al., LATA 2017] is a sequence of sets of strings, which was recently proposed as a way to model a set of similar sequences. We give an online algorithm for the Elastic-Degenerate String Matching (EDSM) problem that runs in O(nm sqrt{m log m} + N) time and O(m) working space, where n is the number of elastic degenerate segments of the text, N is the total length of all strings in the text, and m is the length of the pattern. This improves the previous algorithm by Grossi et al. [CPM 2017] that runs in O(nm^2 + N) time

Comparing Elastic-Degenerate Strings: Algorithms, Lower Bounds, and Applications

An elastic-degenerate (ED) string T is a sequence of n sets T[1], . . ., T[n] containing m strings in total whose cumulative length is N. We call n, m, and N the length, the cardinality and the size of T, respectively. The language of T is defined as L(T) = {S1 · · · Sn : Si ∈ T[i] for all i ∈ [1, n]}. ED strings have been introduced to represent a set of closely-related DNA sequences, also known as a pangenome. The basic question we investigate here is: Given two ED strings, how fast can we check whether the two languages they represent have a nonempty intersection? We call the underlying problem the ED String Intersection (EDSI) problem. For two ED strings T1 and T2 of lengths n1 and n2, cardinalities m1 and m2, and sizes N1 and N2, respectively, we show the following: There is no O((N1N2)1−ϵ)-time algorithm, thus no O ((N1m2 + N2m1)1−ϵ)-time algorithm and no O ((N1n2 + N2n1)1−ϵ)-time algorithm, for any constant ϵ > 0, for EDSI even when T1 and T2 are over a binary alphabet, unless the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis is false. There is no combinatorial O((N1 + N2)1.2−ϵf(n1, n2))-time algorithm, for any constant ϵ > 0 and any function f, for EDSI even when T1 and T2 are over a binary alphabet, unless the Boolean Matrix Multiplication conjecture is false. An O(N1 log N1 log n1 + N2 log N2 log n2)-time algorithm for outputting a compact (RLE) representation of the intersection language of two unary ED strings. In the case when T1 and T2 are given in a compact representation, we show that the problem is NP-complete. An O(N1m2 + N2m1)-time algorithm for EDSI. An Õ(N1ω−1n2 + N2ω−1n1)-time algorithm for EDSI, where ω is the exponent of matrix multiplication; the Õ notation suppresses factors that are polylogarithmic in the input size. We also show that the techniques we develop have applications outside of ED string comparison

Comparing Degenerate Strings

Uncertain sequences are compact representations of sets of similar strings. They highlight common segments by collapsing them, and explicitly represent varying segments by listing all possible options. A generalized degenerate string (GD string) is a type of uncertain sequence. Formally, a GD string S is a sequence of n sets of strings of total size N, where the ith set contains strings of the same length ki but this length can vary between different sets. We denote by W the sum of these lengths k0, k1,... , kn-1. Our main result is an (N + M)-time algorithm for deciding whether two GD strings of total sizes N and M, respectively, over an integer alphabet, have a non-empty intersection. This result is based on a combinatorial result of independent interest: although the intersection of two GD strings can be exponential in the total size of the two strings, it can be represented in linear space. We then apply our string comparison tool to devise a simple algorithm for computing all palindromes in S in (min{W, n2}N)-time. We complement this upper bound by showing a similar conditional lower bound for computing maximal palindromes in S. We also show that a result, which is essentially the same as our string comparison linear-time algorithm, can be obtained by employing an automata-based approach