58 research outputs found

    Fast approximation of centrality and distances in hyperbolic graphs

    Full text link
    We show that the eccentricities (and thus the centrality indices) of all vertices of a δ\delta-hyperbolic graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) can be computed in linear time with an additive one-sided error of at most cδc\delta, i.e., after a linear time preprocessing, for every vertex vv of GG one can compute in O(1)O(1) time an estimate e^(v)\hat{e}(v) of its eccentricity eccG(v)ecc_G(v) such that eccG(v)e^(v)eccG(v)+cδecc_G(v)\leq \hat{e}(v)\leq ecc_G(v)+ c\delta for a small constant cc. We prove that every δ\delta-hyperbolic graph GG has a shortest path tree, constructible in linear time, such that for every vertex vv of GG, eccG(v)eccT(v)eccG(v)+cδecc_G(v)\leq ecc_T(v)\leq ecc_G(v)+ c\delta. These results are based on an interesting monotonicity property of the eccentricity function of hyperbolic graphs: the closer a vertex is to the center of GG, the smaller its eccentricity is. We also show that the distance matrix of GG with an additive one-sided error of at most cδc'\delta can be computed in O(V2log2V)O(|V|^2\log^2|V|) time, where c<cc'< c is a small constant. Recent empirical studies show that many real-world graphs (including Internet application networks, web networks, collaboration networks, social networks, biological networks, and others) have small hyperbolicity. So, we analyze the performance of our algorithms for approximating centrality and distance matrix on a number of real-world networks. Our experimental results show that the obtained estimates are even better than the theoretical bounds.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1506.01799 by other author

    A lower bound for metric 1-median selection

    Full text link
    Consider the problem of finding a point in an n-point metric space with the minimum average distance to all points. We show that this problem has no deterministic o(n2)o(n^2)-query (4Ω(1))(4-\Omega(1))-approximation algorithms

    A Faster Method to Estimate Closeness Centrality Ranking

    Get PDF
    Closeness centrality is one way of measuring how central a node is in the given network. The closeness centrality measure assigns a centrality value to each node based on its accessibility to the whole network. In real life applications, we are mainly interested in ranking nodes based on their centrality values. The classical method to compute the rank of a node first computes the closeness centrality of all nodes and then compares them to get its rank. Its time complexity is O(nm+n)O(n \cdot m + n), where nn represents total number of nodes, and mm represents total number of edges in the network. In the present work, we propose a heuristic method to fast estimate the closeness rank of a node in O(αm)O(\alpha \cdot m) time complexity, where α=3\alpha = 3. We also propose an extended improved method using uniform sampling technique. This method better estimates the rank and it has the time complexity O(αm)O(\alpha \cdot m), where α10100\alpha \approx 10-100. This is an excellent improvement over the classical centrality ranking method. The efficiency of the proposed methods is verified on real world scale-free social networks using absolute and weighted error functions
    corecore