347 research outputs found
Oligarchy and soft incompleteness
The assumption that the social preference relation is complete is demanding. We distinguish between âhardâ and âsoftâ incompleteness, and explore
the social choice implications of the latter. Under soft incompleteness, social preferences can take values in the unit interval. We motivate interest in
soft incompleteness by presenting a version of the strong Pareto rule that
is suited to the context of a [0, 1]-valued social preference relation. Using a
novel approach to the quasi-transitivity of this relation we prove a general
oligarchy theorem. Our framework allows us to make a distinction between
a âstrongâ and a âweakâ oligarchy, and our theorem identifies when the oligarchy must be strong and when it can be weak. Weak oligarchy need not be
undesirable
Oligarchy and soft incompleteness
The assumption that the social preference relation is complete is demanding. We distinguish between âhardâ and âsoftâ incompleteness, and explore
the social choice implications of the latter. Under soft incompleteness, social preferences can take values in the unit interval. We motivate interest in
soft incompleteness by presenting a version of the strong Pareto rule that
is suited to the context of a [0, 1]-valued social preference relation. Using a
novel approach to the quasi-transitivity of this relation we prove a general
oligarchy theorem. Our framework allows us to make a distinction between
a âstrongâ and a âweakâ oligarchy, and our theorem identifies when the oligarchy must be strong and when it can be weak. Weak oligarchy need not be
undesirable
Quantitative Concept Analysis
Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) begins from a context, given as a binary
relation between some objects and some attributes, and derives a lattice of
concepts, where each concept is given as a set of objects and a set of
attributes, such that the first set consists of all objects that satisfy all
attributes in the second, and vice versa. Many applications, though, provide
contexts with quantitative information, telling not just whether an object
satisfies an attribute, but also quantifying this satisfaction. Contexts in
this form arise as rating matrices in recommender systems, as occurrence
matrices in text analysis, as pixel intensity matrices in digital image
processing, etc. Such applications have attracted a lot of attention, and
several numeric extensions of FCA have been proposed. We propose the framework
of proximity sets (proxets), which subsume partially ordered sets (posets) as
well as metric spaces. One feature of this approach is that it extracts from
quantified contexts quantified concepts, and thus allows full use of the
available information. Another feature is that the categorical approach allows
analyzing any universal properties that the classical FCA and the new versions
may have, and thus provides structural guidance for aligning and combining the
approaches.Comment: 16 pages, 3 figures, ICFCA 201
Judgment aggregation on restricted domains
We show that, when a group takes independent majority votes on interconnected propositions, the outcome is consistent once the profile of individual judgment sets respects appropriate structural conditions. We introduce several such conditions on profiles, based on ordering the propositions or ordering the individuals, and we clarify the relations between these conditions. By restricting the conditions to appropriate subagendas, we obtain local conditions that are less demanding but still guarantee consistent majority judgments. By applying the conditions to agendas representing preference aggregation problems, we show parallels of some conditions to existing social-choice-theoretic conditions, specifically to order restriction and intermediateness, restricted to triples of alternatives in the case of our local conditions.mathematical economics;
- âŚ